Showing posts with label Penang Property News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Penang Property News. Show all posts

Sunday, October 26, 2014

寸土是金 发展窘境 填海索地?开拓山坡?(山坡风云)

报道:梁子奋/黄佩玲(本报前新闻组长)
槟城寸土是金,过去5年屋价飙升让槟城人都有土地不够用的感叹。槟城人脚下的土地,一方尺就是以百令吉来计算,特别是槟岛人对这个现象感受特别深刻。
虽然槟岛和威省都是槟城,但是在5年前槟岛人口中说槟城的时候,只是代表槟岛,讲到威省人的时候,总要用“过港”、北海人或是大山脚人来区分。不过这种情况近几年已经越来越少见了,因为在槟岛屋价高涨的情况下,新一代槟岛人已经不得不走出去,到威省买房子了。
槟城(特别是槟岛)屋价坐直升机直线上升,除了建筑成本、外州及外国人纷纷选择到槟城置业投资外,土地有限也是造成屋价飞涨的原因。
解决土地不足的问题,除了把房子越建越高外,就只能是对旧发展区进行重新规划推倒重建,甚至一些古迹建筑物也因为要用来发展而被有意无意的牺牲掉,甚至还要与死人争地,坟墓地也被用来建房子。
近20年来槟州也一直在通过填土的方式向海索地以增加可发展土地。2020年槟州结构大蓝图更出了几个槟岛未来可以进行填海的地点,不过填海索地增加土地面积的方法毕竟有限,槟城缺少土地的问题只会随着时间的发展压力越来越大。
须认真思考槟发展 提供理想居住环境
  • 世界不动产联盟槟州分会前主席黄丽丝
世界不动产联盟槟州分会前主席黄丽丝认为,伴随着2008年乔治市获得联合国世界文化遗产地位,槟城已经成为世界的焦点,朝向国际化城市发展已是必然的趋势。她认为,槟城因为国际城市化带来无限的发展潜能的同时,发展土地不足的问题也将会越来越严峻。她认为,槟城要持续的繁荣发展,就不得不认真思考槟城未来发展的方向,因为城市要繁荣和继续向前迈进,首先就要给推动发展的人才和人口提供理想的居住环境,让人们可以安居下来后,把精力投入于建设。
目前槟州面对土地不足压力的主要是槟岛。面积285平方公里的槟岛,只有一半是平地,至于山林地的发展,因为有山坡发展指南的管制,发展只限于76公尺(或150尺)以下,斜度不超过25度的山林地可以发展屋业。
根据槟州城乡规划局的资料,槟岛平地与山地约各占一半。槟岛高度发展的地区大部分集中在东北县平地上,未来要再发展,除了要向西南县转移外,就只能跨海向威省发展。
由于威省和西南县分别有槟威海峡及浮罗山相隔,目前仍不能取代东北县的地位,这也是为什么东北县地价不断飙高的原因。
促关注威省发展 缓和槟屋价高涨
  • 大马房地产发展商会槟分会会长拿督陈福星
有限的可发展土地,除了要应付现有75万人口成长的需求外,槟城朝向国际城市方向的发展,乔治市获得联合国世界文化遗产城地位,外国投资者的涌入,有限土地在供不应求的情况下,地价屋价一路被推高,负担不起这个高屋价的槟岛人,没有选择的只能搬出槟岛。
马来西亚房地产发展商会槟州分会会长拿督陈福星因此促请槟州政府关注威省发展,以便缓和槟岛屋价高涨的压力。
在槟岛发展地严缺下,他甚至建议政府将峇六拜国际机场搬迁到海上,如此将可以为槟岛争取到逾千英亩的现有机场平地来减缓土地不够发展的压力。
土地有限的槟岛,如果在有限的平地发展完了,旧区重建和可以填的海域都填了土后,发展的列车要往那里开?到那个时候,目前被禁止发展的山林地,是不是要允许发展?
山林地发展近几年在槟城一直是敏感话题。2012年国阵和民政槟州政府更因为谁批准了山林地而引起了一阵很长的争议。
青山绿水是槟城的品牌标志,对山林环境保护者而言,山林更是人类的重要资产,不容华许任何的破坏。
再加上20年前发生在吉隆坡的淡江高峰塔公寓倒塌事件夺走48条人命的惨剧,1988年垄尾山泥倾泄淹没了14辆车的惊险一幕,都让很多人对山林地发展感到忧心。
不论是环保人士、州政府还是房地产发展商会,现阶段都不希望槟城的山林受到大事的破坏。
然而,在土地每开发一分就少一分的情况下,槟城最终要怎样发展下去,青山与住房,生态保护与生活空间如何同时兼得,正在考验槟州160万人和决策者的智慧。- 光华

山坡发展建可负担屋 民众关注是否涉及大众利益

《光华日报》与理大研究团队特别对于“山坡课题”上做出民调,大部分民众认为,如果槟城真的要进行山坡发展,民众最关注的是,是否涉及大众利益。
受访的民众所提起的大众利益,包括在山坡地带建可负担的房子、开僻道路减轻交通的拥挤、甚至可发展旅游业,除了帮助经济成长之余,还可提供民众多一份就业机会及增加收入。
如果在这些大前提下,民众其实不会太过反对山坡发展,但前提是,发展山坡之前,政府一定要有完整的规划。
这项民调,将分为上下篇处理。
值得一提的是,与《光华日报》合作的研究团队为邱淑桦博士及林静仪硕士。邱淑桦博士为理科大学前讲师,林静仪为邱淑桦博士前学生,目前在理科大学修读博士。她俩和光华一起合作,进行过几项研究考查,其中包过槟城入遗课题和中文报读者调查。
这次两师徒再次携手和光华日报合作,针对槟城人民对于槟州山坡发展课题的看法进行民调。
对槟发展不一见解
受访者对于槟城的发展都有不一样的见解。一部分受访者觉得发展得太慢,一部分受访者觉得发展得还不错,也有一小部分受访者觉得槟城已经过度发展。
槟城的发展对他们来说是好坏参半的。有的受访者想要看到更多的高楼大厦,有的则担心槟城将来会变成第二个香港;有的希望看到发展,但不愿看到槟城的建筑过度密集;也有受访者觉得槟城的发展,已让槟城过去良好舒适的居住环境大不如前。
大部分受访者都认为槟城从以前到现在算得上有发展,但还可以有更进一步的发展。他们也觉得,近几年发展得最快的是槟城的旅游业。也有受访者认为,其实房地产也一直在发展中,只是,房地产的发展视乎都不太有利于槟城人因为房价的高涨对槟城人来说已成为了一种负担。
景点区可建民宿
对生态环境友好的农村是最受受访者喜爱的山坡发展计划。
受访者也建议,这些景点区可以建一些简单的民宿。但如果是建大型的房楼那受访者们就认为会有危险。
如果要解决槟城面对住宅的问题,有受访者建议可以在平地起高楼而不是选择山坡来解决这问题。大多的受访者都认为山坡只是适合起一些比较少楼层的建筑。也有受访者认为,如果在山坡开僻马路,可以解决槟城的交通问题就更好。
山坡开僻马路解决交通问题
对于槟城的未来,受访者都很期待看到槟城未来可以继续的发展。他们不想要看到槟城停歇不前。但也有受访者希望发展可以展延至北海地区以确保槟岛本身不会太过度的发展和开发。
受访者所期待的发展也不只是纯粹看到高楼大厦的涌起,他们希望槟城可以从基本的设施着手。
值得一提的是,谈到发展,大多的受访者都会联想到交通问题,研究结果显示槟城人都在面对着交通问题的困扰。
这也是他们在发展与不发展之间的重要挣扎因素之一。受访者是想要看到多方面的发展,但也很担心发展的话会不会让他们面对更严重的交通问题。
房产业的发展让他们担忧会否导致发展地区的交通阻塞,旅游业的发展也令他们担心会不会有太多外来车子涌入槟城。此外,受访者也希望说在发展的同时,古迹,文化还有治安也该受到注意。
受访者认为,如果在山坡开僻马路,可以解决槟城的交通问题就更好。
也有受访者认为,如果山坡发展是用来建住宅的房子的话,那大部分的好处都会回归于发展商而已。除非将建的会是那种人民负担的起的房子,那才会对槟城的子民带来好处。
多数受访者都比较认同,山坡发展可用于发展旅游景点,所以他们也认为这种发展肯定可以对旅游业带来很大的帮助,与此同时也可以促进槟城的经济成长和知名度,也比较有利于市民,提升他们的收入;增加一些就业机会,也让他们有多一个本地的休闲点。
亲自然生态的山坡发展也让一些受访者觉得会有利于人民因为至少环境还是多少会受到保护。
减低发展破坏程度
受访者对于槟城山坡发展抱着正负两面的看法。他们都有着很不同的看法。
不支持山坡发展的受访者,多数都是因为顾及保护自然生态还有发生天灾的可能性之因素所影响。他们认为,山坡一旦发展就会对环境造成破坏,而这种破坏是不可能以其他方法来弥补的。
山坡发展也会导致天灾,最为担心会发生的是水灾和土崩。这群受访者认为,山坡发展所需要付出的代价是很大的,除了天灾也担心会严重的破坏自然生态以及产生温室效应。
而且槟城很多地方都以它的自然景象闻名,所以他们觉得山坡发展不太适合槟城。此外也有一名受访者认为山坡发展是不可行的因为之前所发展的山坡都还没规划好,何必继续开发其它的山坡。
有的受访者则认为,可不可以接受山坡发展主要取决于:发展的用途和牵涉发展的面积。
受访者多数觉得山坡发展如果是为了发展旅游景点那还可接受,而且如果景点可以是以原本的自然环境做为主题减低破坏程度,自然生态可以继续保留,那就更好不过。
需要基本防灾知识
有受访者觉得政府所发布的资料是比较准确可靠,与此同时也有受访者觉得有时候该知道的资讯都已被发展商或政府封锁了。
受访者也提及,其实大家不只是应该知道和理解,也需要把自己的看法说出来因为山坡发展不是一个人或一小部分人的事情,它是牵涉着广众的。除了关于山坡的资讯受访者也认为我们需要对未来可能会发生的灾害做些准备,取得基本的防灾知识。
大部分的受访者都只觉得,政府和发展商扮演着最重要的角色,他们认为政府和发展商有认真做事才是最重要的。
但也有一小部分的受访者认为,专业人士或非政府组织也应该不时的提供相关的意见。更有受访者认为监督山坡发展是每个市民都应有的责任。
【民众心声】
这项调查共访问20名来自槟城各地区的人士,这些民众来自遍及槟岛主要城镇。其中包括浮罗山背、乔治市、青草巷、峇都丁宜、玻璃池滑,峇六拜,牛汝莪、日落洞及峇央峇鲁等。20名受访者年龄介于20岁至65岁,牵涉不一样的工作领域。
林石治
★政府应该知道我们担心的是什么,应该听我们的心声。为什么有些人不要山坡发展,我们担心的又是什么。如果政府可以解释一下,我们感觉会比较好。
★山坡发展问题应该问大家的意见,每个人意见都不同嘛,最好的方法是投票,给每个人都有发表意见的机会,再比较每个人都会有不一样的看法。
JOHN
★发展,我看最近是发展得很快啦…但不是廉价屋,是很贵的房子。
邱振宗
★我觉得发展很慢,慢得离谱,比不上人家。还有,我觉得,州政府跟中央政府配合不到,阻碍了发展。
★我认为,如果山坡建房子,政府应该分类外国人及本地人的买屋税,外国人应高一些,没理由我们买的价钱和外国人一样的。如果我们一直买不起,房子都被外国人买去,那山坡有无发展还是一样,我们也没有房子住。所以说,政府很重要,尤其是他们的政策、他们的条例、要搞得很清楚,人民才可以安心啊。
邱女士
★山哪可以砍的?!
你看我们一直水灾就知道了。山是大自然的挡水器。那些百年老树你以为只是在那边好看吗?树是可以防水,可以防止土崩的。你一弄到它,土就松然后就会土崩。接下来还会有很多可怕的事情。一下大雨你就知道了。
陈洁仪
★虽然发展能促进繁荣,但绝对不适于在高山。因为槟城高山是属大自然景点,如果连这点也剥夺去,便是破坏大自然的生态环境,动物更失去了自己本身的栖息地。
★在每一个发展项目中都必须顾及周边的环境条件,且必须保存一定的环境需求,以达到双边都能共识。
CINDY
★这课题在于山坡发展所牵涉的用途。如果是发展为旅游景点,那当然会为社会与经济带来帮助。槟城将会成为游客的度假首选进而助长经济。
陈嘉雯(译音)
★山坡发展可以是多方面的。会否对社会与经济带来好处取决于山坡发展的用途。那如果是亲大自然的发展,当然会为人民带来好处。
陈佳园
★我觉得槟城是需要更好的统治。不但是只专注在发展旅游胜地,也要改善治安,交通等。
★我不同意山坡发展。因为槟城现在依然拥有美好的大自然景色,如果开拓山区,会破坏了大自然的景色,也造成生态不平衡。我认为,可以建立更多类似蝴蝶公园般接近大自然的旅游地区。
Jolyn
★一定需要,如果停止发展会变得落后,我们应继续让槟城越来越繁荣。
苏美玲
★我觉得其实那个策划要做得很好。一开始就需要做的很好。如果是说安危就像刚才我说的不要建太多的房子。建少数的民宿就好。就远远一两间的问题应该才不会那么大。
May女士
★做旅游景点,旅游景点是可以接受的,不要浪费那个地方。可以的话,把山坡开辟作路线,像做高速公路,哪不是更好吗?
黄荣福(译音)
★山坡如果是建房子,要建也该建一些可让民众负担的房子。
陈栩玲
★要如何让民众知道发展的好处咯,包括如何去吸引人家来,如果像民宿、发展大自然等,在发展的同时又不会破坏那些生态,看政府如何去设定政策,一些条规,要那些去观光的人遵守。- 光华

向国外专人学习参考 严管发展确保安全(山坡风云)

报道:林静仪
整理:林松荣
受访的民众皆认为,政府需要非常严厉的看管山坡发展,更不可以随意批准毫无意义的山坡发展计划,如果要发展,一切要以民众的利益为先。
要发展山坡,受访的民众认为,政府当局首要的任务,就是如何消除民众对山坡发展的顾虑,例如如何防止山崩、意外等之类的事件发生。受访民众同时不反对政府办多一些讲解或讲座来增加民众对这方面的知识。
值得一提的是,如果发展山坡,大多数的受访者对外国的专业人士会有更大信心,在研究山坡发展的同时,除了应用本地专人外,也得向国外的专人学习,参考与交流。
相关政府部门也该考虑把国外的先进科技带入,把国外的专人意见和技术融入本地的山坡发展,这些都会让他们比较安心。
有关受访者为20名来自槟城各地区的人士,这些民众来自遍及槟岛主要城镇。其中包括浮罗山背、乔治市、青草巷、峇都丁宜、浮罗地滑,峇六拜,牛汝莪、日落洞及峇央峇鲁等。受访者年龄介于20岁至65岁,牵涉不一样的工作领域。
发展与环境难平衡
山坡发展与保护环境的平衡点受访者都认为山坡发展与环境是无法达到平衡的。
山坡的开发无论牵涉的范围是大或小,都一定会影响环境;唯一不同的是影响或严重性的程度。
也有受访者提到,现在其实也有不少发展商都会加入一些亲大自然的元素在发展的工程里。
部分受访者觉得对此有些发展商做得还不错,有的则觉得发展商只是草草了事,随便弄个秋千滑板来交差。
受访者都很期望可以看到像国外那般策划得比较有规律的公园。他们认为我们也不可以完全不顾及后患的发展,该保留的山坡与树木还是得保留,发展是需要良好规划的。
大致上受访者其实都对环境的影响会感到担心,不一样的只是有的受访者觉得环境的影响是不适怠慢,但有的则觉得应该先发展,环境的问题可以稍微迟一点再来关心。
对于拟补失去的树木与山坡,也有受访者觉得失去的是无法拟补,但也有受访者可以接受发展后把失去的树木数量从新种植。
针对平衡这一点受访者各有各的说法,每个人都有着各自的观点,但大家都有一些共同观点,那就是不可能达到平衡,只可以把环境破坏减到最低;发展山坡也一定要做好规划以及有限制的发展以免发生天灾,导致人民的安全受到威胁。
政府需听民意了解担忧
受访者认为,山坡发展不可以单凭本地发展商来做抉择,政府扮演的角色其实非常重要。
受访者认为,政府除了需要监督和设下严厉的条规来确保民众的安全外,也需要听听民意,了解他们的担忧,同时也该透过各种管道为他们解答关于山坡发展的疑问让人民对山坡发展有更进一步的理解。
除了立法,政府也需要执法:确保所有的工程都是依照法列实行,确保发展商是有根据批准的方案来发展。
政府的相关部门是需要一直监督与检查。受访者说检查是需要不停的进行的,而且如果可以突击检查的话,效果会更加好。
政府需要非常严厉的看管山坡发展,不可以随意批准毫无意义的山坡发展计划。在作出批与不批的考量的当儿,应该以大众的利益为先。
政府要很明确的和人民交代山坡发展的用途,也得确保这些山坡被开发后是安全且有利于人民而不是只让发展商得益。
必须一提的是,大部分的受访者都只觉得政府和发展商扮演着最重要的角色,他们认为政府和发展商有认真的做事才是最重要的。但也有一小部分的受访者认为专业人士或非政府组织也应该不时的提供相关的意见。更有受访者认为监督山坡发展是每个市民都应有的责任。
对于山坡发展课题上,受访者各有各的担忧。大部分的受访者担心的和他们不支持山坡发展的理由是一致的:环境与生态问题,灾害的可能性。
受访者觉得,如果是与大自然融合,与生态友好的发展是不是也会影响到山坡的生态,发展的同时政府是不是也需要控制同一时间到访的人群以及定下一些条规以确保生态不会大幅度的受破坏以达到一个真正的亲大自然的山坡发展。
但最首要的,发展的话,我们是不是有适当,拥有足够经验与知识的专人给我们提供意见与实行?
也有受访者说即使是发展成景点,是不是可以确保交通不会有问题。
一些受访者觉得,他们必须关心的不只是现在发不发展,或适不适合的问题,而是也得想想发展山坡对未来会不会造成影响;哪方面的影响还有我们该怎么去防止这些未来的问题的发生;发展过后是不是可以确保永久性的维修才不至于白白浪费一片山坡。
至于如果是发展成住宅的话,建筑物的安全也是他们的顾虑之一。
监督工作减低发展风险
受访者都觉得除了本地专人外,也得向国外的专人学习,参考与交流。
相关部门也该考虑把国外的先进科技带入,把国外的专人意见和技术融入本地的山坡发展,这些都会让他们比较安心。
除此之外,他们也担心如果对山坡发展给予支持的话,那接下来的这些发展的项目到底会不会真的有利于人民呢?
受访者都觉得,发展山坡多少都会有风险。所以从策划到未来,都是不可以掉以轻心的。受访者指出发展山坡的策划非常的重要。最令他们关注的就是建筑本身和山坡发展的安危。
未来我们又得防范些什么呢?受访者也认为民众的担忧也会因人而异。大部分的受访者都提及了发展条例与监督工作的重要性。山坡发展从一开始的检验山坡是否适合发展到未来可否持续性的保持在良好的状态之下也是受访者非常关注的。
媒体报道正负资讯
媒体的角色,受访者都对媒体抱着很高的期望,希望媒体可以让他们得到多方面的看法及资讯以让他们更了解山坡发展。
他们希望,媒体是可以公正的平台下,不受任何一方面的摆布来报道关于山坡发展的课题。他们想要看到媒体不只是采访本地的相关单位和专人,也希望媒体可以采访国外的专人以让他们看到更全面更可靠的资讯。
受访者觉得,国外的专人所给的意见和看法会比较有说服力。他们也期待媒体除了采访也可以出任一个独立的组织,凭着他们从采访资料收集过程中所学到的,代市民做一些实地考察,比较等。
媒体也可以做一些调查,发表一些人民的心声来让相关部门听取而不止是成为政府或发展商发言的管道而已。受访者要看到媒体报道涵盖正负两面的讯息以让他们个人也可以做个比较。
资料让民准确判断
槟城人对山坡发展会想要有进一步认知资料显示,大部分受访者觉得槟城人对山坡发展的课题都会想要有进一步的认知。也有受访者觉得,槟城人对这课题不太感兴趣。
这主要是看大家抱着怎样的一种个人心态去看待山坡发展。但有不少受访者都提及,其实最关键的是资料该从哪里取;取得的资料又是否可靠?
大部分的受访者都希望可以从讲座获得更多关于山坡发展的资讯, 以便他们可以在作出准确的判断。
也有受访者提及因为现在的资讯无所不在,媒体、网站、甚至是无所不有的社交网,但是他们却有点质疑这些资料的可靠性。- 光华

检讨山坡发展限制●搬迁机场腾出空间 缺土地産业价必涨(山坡风云)

报道:梁子奋
国际不动产联盟槟城分会前主席拿督黄丽丝认为,在土地缺乏的需求日益增加的情况下,槟城的产业价格将会继续的攀升。
黄丽丝说,槟城已经成为国际城市,在国际产业链中,成为继国际大城市之后,备受国际投资者关注的地方。在这个发展情况下,前来槟城的国际投资者及富人、专才只会越来越多。
她说,这个现象不可避免的会使到槟城的产业价格被越推越高。但是,这个趋势不能够叫停,因为如果发展停顿,槟城将会失去发展动力和魅力,开始回流的人才将会再出现外流,年轻人出走。
发展若停顿失动力魅力
她认为,为确保槟州持续发展,并且解决人民的住房问题,政府当局有必要重新检讨目前的发展限制,包括放宽目前的1对2.8房产容积率(plot ratio,影响单位密度),或每英亩建87单位的密度限制。另一个解决槟城土地问题的方案就是重新检讨87公尺(250尺)山坡地高度发展限制。
她说,槟城的房产容积率1对2.8在国内城市和外国大城市比较都过度保守,柔佛和其它国家都已经提高到1对20的比率了。
“我们不需要一下子将比率提高到1对20,不过为解决住房问题,可以试着将比率提高到1对12。”
槟房产容积率过度保守
她说,很多人对于谈到提高山坡地高度限制都很敏感,然而专家们已经多次提出,山坡地发展的安全性与高低没有直接的关注,而他们更关注的是山坡的斜度,因此槟城的发展不应该被高度绑死,相反的应该理性的以槟城发展的需要重新慎重的来检讨这个问题。
无论如何,她说,不论是山坡地还是平地,任何的发展都必须要做好安全及环境工作,这两个重要因素是不能够有任何妥协的。
她认为,一个城市的发展需要以未来的100年来规划,不能只是解决当前的需要而已,必须对城市的未来发展都计算在里面。
禁止发展非最佳护山方案 不法农耕活动也具破坏性
缺乏发展地对于发展商来说,就好比一个巧炊的主妇没有了米。马来西亚房地产发展商会槟州分会会长拿督陈福星提出了发展威省、重新检讨山坡发展高度限制,甚至建议将峇六拜国际机场搬到海上,以缓解槟城土地不足的问题。
陈福星说,马来西亚房地产发展商会曾向州政府表达希望重新检讨250尺高度限制的政策。不过,做为一个负责任的发展商,他们也认为山地开发必须要有规划和管制,不能无限制进行。
他认为,250尺高度限制应该重新检讨,一些适合发展和已经发展的地区,应该允许超过这个高度的发展。
他举例,垄尾和新港的山坡发展应该被允许超过250尺的限制,因为这些地区已经有发展,一些旧的发展计划,建筑物高度也超过了250尺的高度。特别是垄尾地区,现有建在山地的高楼建筑物,总体高度都超过了海拔250尺,建筑物已经把后面的山给遮住了。针对这些地区,当局可以允许超过250尺的发展计划。
他认为,对于这些地区的新发展计划,当局可以给予有条件的批准,也就是新计划的总体建筑物高度不超过之前的建筑物总体高度。
他说,简单的禁止山坡发展并不是保护山林的最好方案,因为山地非法的农业种植活动,也会给山地及环境造成巨大的破坏。山林执法不易,很多时候非法种植活动表面上看也是青绿一片,不过开发和收割都会给山地造成水土流失等破坏,这也是金马仑面对的问题,槟岛的亚依淡也一样。
陈福星也特别提到湖内山被非法开发的案例。这个案例是在有条例管制情况下发生的。
槟岛最大魅力是青山绿水
尽管希望槟州政府可以重新检讨250尺的山坡发展高度限制,不过陈福星并不希望政府全面提高高度限制,也不支持把槟州的高度限制提高到500尺跟全国一样的高度限制。
他认为,发展并不能无止境的进行,槟岛与其它国家已经大事开发的岛屿不同,它具有本身的特色和魅力。槟岛最大的魅力就是青山绿水。
“我们身在槟岛,不论什么角度都可以看到山景,对槟岛有认识的人都会同意这一点。”
他说,如果把山坡发展高度限制无限度提高,一栋高过一栋的建筑物将让槟岛的青山景观被钢骨水泥森林所取代。
威省槟岛发展不均 人民买屋抗拒离岛
陈福星说,不可否认的,槟城做为北马地区的经济、旅游及文化焦点区,人口不断的迁入对住房需求不断增加是不能回避的问题。不过,槟城并不只有槟岛,威省有更大面积的发展土段。
他因此认为,当前如果可以搞好威省,让人民不再只是对槟岛存在迷思,就可以很好的解决槟城的住房问题。
他认为,州政府有必要深入探讨为什么槟民在购置房产时,都要先考虑到槟岛。这是因为发展不平衡。如果两地发展得到平衡,槟岛有的设施利便威省都有,那么人们就不会只往槟岛跑。
他说,目前威省地区的房价和槟岛比较仍有30%的差距,仍有很大的发展空间。
陈福星在谈到槟岛因为房屋需求量大,并且面对可发展地短缺的问题时提出了搬迁机场的建议。
他说,峇六拜国际机场的现址,因为紧连着工业区,目前也面对跑道只是刚刚好符合最低标准长度的问题,因此提出了搬迁机场的大胆建议。他说,现在很多和槟城类似的城市,都已经把机场搬迁到海上,比如新加坡和澳门。
“将机场搬到海上,可以给槟岛腾出上千英亩的地段,这将可以解决槟岛短期土地短缺的房屋发展问题。”
他认为,另一个中短期方案则是旧区重建。槟岛仍有一些旧发展区可以重新规划进行重建。- 光华

没记载为何限250尺高度 曹观友:若缺地或放宽限制(山坡风云)

报道:梁子奋
摄影:梁僡育
2012年山坡发展课题出现巨大争议时,州政府曾委任以拿督魏世福博士为首的专家小组对槟州的山坡进行深入勘查。这个由州政府成立的“山边发展指南顾问团”专家小组在完成研究后,为政府草拟了新的《山坡发展指南》。
新拟定的山坡发展指南更详尽的阐明了对山坡发展计划的要求,以及更严格的监督系统。
无论如何,槟州地方政府委员会主席曹观友说,在槟州结构蓝图中阐明,任何高度超过海拔76公尺(250尺)及斜度被归类为第3及第4级的山坡,都不能做为一般发展用途。这些山坡地只能做为基本建设及特别计划用途。
他指出,在此之前山坡发展计划的申请是根据1996年大蓝图来批准和规划。2007年6月28日宪报公布的《2020年槟州结构大蓝图》取代了原有的大蓝图。
他说,尽管政府在审批州内的山坡发展计划时,还是根据《2020年槟州结构大蓝图》,不过在2012年新拟定的《山坡发展指南》出炉后,当局在审批涉及到山坡的发展计划时,将会以新指南做为参考标准。
他强调,目前州政府并没有批准任何超过海拔76公尺高度的房屋发展计划。
因水压限制高度? 曹观友:不具说服力
槟州的山坡地发展高度限制划定在海拔76公尺(250尺),是根据什么标准至今仍没有人能说出一个所以然来。
曹观友在被问到这个问题时,也表示在州政府纪录中并没有记载为什么会把高度限制定在76公尺。
不影响高楼供水
他说,他听到的其中一个说法是当年在制定高度限制的时候,所根据的是当时的水压条件。
无论如何,他认为这个虽然是最常听到的说法,不过却不具说服力,特别是今天的技术并不会受到水坝高度影响高楼的供水。
他举例升旗山的个案,升旗山的高度也超过76公尺,不过并没有因此面对供水问题,当局以蓄水池来给升旗山山上居民供水。
可参考港山坡发展
曹观友透露,2012年州政府在成立“山边发展指南顾问团”专家小组时,曾针对山坡发展问题前往香港进行考察,成员包括相关的政府部门官员。
他说,香港在1970年代也面对山坡发展带来的问题,不过在严重土崩事件频频发生后,香港投入了庞大的资金及资源进行山坡维修及防崩措施,今天香港山坡发展已经成为很多国家参考的对象。
他坦言槟州目前并不具备香港当时对山坡防护投入巨大财力物力的能力,无论如何,香港的例子可以给槟州很多的启发和参考价值。
他说,槟州政府正计划聘请香港退休的山坡发展专家前来协助,以提高山坡的安全及协助规划山坡发展。
多区进行填海计划
曹观友坦承,槟州的发展面对土地短缺的问题。这也是为什么槟州过去一直都有填海计划在进行。
他举例日落洞沿海和丹绒道光都有填海计划在进行。在2020年槟州发展大蓝图中也有圈出未来可以进行填海的建议地区,其中包括了峇东、北赖河工业区和槟威海峡中浅滩等。不过位于日落洞外的中浅滩填海计划可能因为植物园区州议员郑雨周极力对那里的海草床提出保护而有变更。
5年可检讨发展限制
尽管曹观友在接受访问时慎重的表示,州政府并没有批准超过76公尺高度的私人发展计划,不过他同时也指出,这个自1996年9月13日由州策划委员会划定下来的高度限制,并不是不能被修改的。
他说,山坡发展指南是可以根据情况的需要进行收紧和放宽的调整,同样的76公尺的高度限制也是可以往上拉或往下放,甚至取消。不过,这都要视未来的发展需要,由制定条例的政府当局根据需要和人民的意愿来做出调整。
他指出,实际上,根据大马城市及乡村规划法令,山坡发展的限制每隔5年就可以重新检讨。
这也意味着,未来发展面对没有土地,面对土地压力的时候,现有指南中的发展限制被放宽是绝对有可能的。
不过,曹观友透露,目前暂时没有听到城乡规划局有意要检讨山坡发展限制。
他指出,城乡规划局虽然是联邦政府部门,他们会自行根据发展需要来检讨包括山坡的发展问题,尽管如此,如果要检讨山坡发展他们将会参考州政府在2012年聘请专家小组拟定的山坡发展报告。有关报告提出的山坡安全考量,并不在于高度,而更重视斜度。- 光华

斜度影响山坡安全 魏世福:无需限制发展高度(山坡风云)

报道:梁子奋
摄影:骆炜芬/曾华维/档案照
对比
槟城:槟城总面积1048平方公里,只比香港小5%。槟岛面积285平方公里。升旗山最高峰830公尺。
香港:香港境內陸地面积1104.39平方公里,港岛面积约78.40平方公里,最高峰是太平山,海拔554公尺。
山坡发展安全高度不是问题,风险主要来自斜度。2012年受到槟州政府委任主持山边发展指南顾问团的拿督魏世福博士认为,山坡发展安全问题并不在于高度,因为关系到山坡安全的并不是高度,而是斜度。
他说,2012年顾问团在完成山坡发展指南报告后,也向槟州政府提出了这个意见。
拿督魏因此认为,限制山坡发展高度并没有必要。
他建议州政府对槟州的山坡地进行全面及有系统的分析,以详细划分出哪个地区可以发展,那一些山区涉及到集水区或需要保留加以保护。对于那些可以发展的山坡地,则可以根据其地质和实质条件,列出允许发展的标准。
他说,只要做好这方面的规划,任何高度的山坡地都可以允许发展。
无论如何,他强调,所谓的允许发展并不是无限制的开发,而是要清楚的列出发展的最高密度和必须进行的山坡及环境保护条件。
“如果我们可以做到这一点,适当的发展还有助于提高山坡的安全性。”
拿督魏说,山坡安全从来都不是不发展就安全,因为不发展的山坡同样会有水土流失,同样会发生山泥倾泄。他认为,面对山坡发展问题,首先要关注的就是安全,其次是环境生态。简单的用海拔76公尺(250尺)高度做为限制并不科学。
拿督魏认为,用76公尺来做限制山坡发展的标准并不合理,而且没有根据。
他强调,山坡地安全应该以斜度来制定能不能发展的准绳。在这方面,山坡发展指南已经有清楚的划分。
不允许发展集水区
从地质角度来说,魏世福说槟岛的地层是花岗岩,并没有一些人说的不适合发展。
魏世福尽管在山坡发展课题上抱持着打破250尺限制的立场,并提出了山坡安全与高度没有关系的见解,不过他并不认为山坡地可以没有限制的建筑楼房。
他认为,在经过鉴定可以用来发展的山坡地仍需要保留70%或更多的非建筑空地。
他说,那些斜度太高的山坡地以及集水区,不论是不是在76公尺以下,都不能允许发展。他指出,现在的山坡发展技术,已经可以克服高度和非高风险的斜度山坡地安全问题。
他用地理环境与槟城都有高度相似的香港为例,香港岛的山坡地发展已经克服了山坡地发展所面对的问题,甚至是在超高斜度的坡地旁都可以建高楼。
大马工程师协会州分会副主席邱昆泰:土地建房解住问题
香港地少人多,港岛山区大部份土地都已经被拿来建房子,解决人民的住房问题。
大马工程师协会州分会副主席邱昆泰指出,面对没有土地发展压力的香港,正准备更进一步放宽山坡地发展的标准,考虑允许过去被评为危险性较高的山坡地进行发展计划。他说,除了香港,处在环太平洋的火山地震带的台湾也同样允许高地发展。这主要是目前的工程技术,已经可以克服山坡发展可能带来的安全问题。
槟山坡拥花岗岩地质
邱昆泰表示,和香港及台湾比较,拥有花岗岩质地层的地质的槟城,有更稳定和更适合发展的条件。
“槟城的山坡地绝大部份红泥地,成份主要是黏土和沙,有黏性的土壤,而且山坡地的泥层也不厚,因此在进行发展工程时,可以把建筑物的基础直接坐到花岗岩层,增加建筑物的稳定性。”他透露,一般山坡地建筑工程都采用直接把地基做到岩盘里,也就是所谓的“沉箱”技术。
他指出,槟城山坡地的花岗岩多是根据山形走向,平均在地表下面10公尺就是花岗岩层。一些山坡地花岗岩层还直接就露在地表外。这一点有别于大马其它地区的石灰石地质,花岗岩地质的硬度要高很多,而且具有稳定的特性。他认为,槟城一提到山坡地发展就会引起强烈反弹,主要是山坡发展的安全问题被情绪化的放大。实际上槟城在过去并没有发生特别严重山坡地发展意外。
依指南发展不伤环保
邱昆泰认为,适合发展的山坡地用来建高楼更合适。如果从经济和破坏层面来说,高地发展与平地发展并没有太大差别。因为平地发展也会使到肥沃的土地的减少。
他说,高地一般地表不厚,接近岩盘,因此地基工作可以直接做到岩盘上,建高楼不会有安全问题,而且可以减少土地的开发,被开发的土地没有这么多,保养和维持成本也相对较轻。
他认为,只要在发展时遵照指南的要求,并且与政府配合规划发展计划,山坡地发展并不会对环保造成破坏或对发展本身造成危险。
他说,如果政府解除山坡地的高度发展限制,允许发展,发展计划也只是会在那些适合发展的山坡地进行,因为条例严苛的山坡地要发展就要进行更多的技术工作,这无疑需要投入更多的资金,因此从经济效益层面来说,发展商也不可能会去动那些高斜度,具有更大风险的山坡地。
邱昆泰指出,很多人对山坡地安全都有错误的认知,以为山坡地自然的放然不去动它就是安全,事实上却不是这样。山体滑坡、山泥倾泄在自然山坡经常都会发生。
相比之下,因为发展而得到处理的山坡,其安全性要远比自然山坡高。
他说,一般工程师在处理山林地发展计划时,都会对周边可能对地程地段会有影响的山坡进行检查,如果有必须都会提出处理的建议。- 光华

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Tambun Indah expanding landbank

PETALING JAYA: Penang property developer Tambun Indah Land Bhd is expanding its landbank in Seberang Prai with the proposed acquisition of a 209-acre land for RM150mil.
Its wholly-owned subsidiary, Palmington Sdn Bhd (PSB), yesterday acknowledged a letter of acceptance of offer to acquire 27 parcels adjacent to the group’s flagship development, Pearl City.
Tambun Indah managing director Teh Kiak Seng said the proposed land acquisition would enlarge its remaining ongoing and undeveloped landbank in Pearl City to 844 acres from 635 acres previously.
“We are constantly looking out for landbank to expand Pearl City. This parcel of land is a good opportunity for us to strengthen our position as a key developer in Seberang Prai to capture the anticipated demand uptrend for affordable homes,” he said in a statement yesterday.
He added that this was in light of the recent opening of the Sultan Abdul Halim Muadzam Shah Bridge (Penang second bridge) and upcoming developments in and around Batu Kawan.
TPPT Sdn Bhd (TPPT) is the vendor of the land.
Tambun Indah will be paying about RM16 per sq ft, considerably lower than the market rate for land around that area.
In a news report last month, Henry Butcher Seberang Prai associate director Fook Tone Huat said vacant land prices in South Seberang Prai where the second bridge was located, were now hovering around RM40-RM50 per sq ft, compared with RM8-RM9 per sq ft prior to the announcement of the second link project in 2006.
At that market rate, Tambun Indah is buying the land at a maximum discount of 68%.
The transaction is subject to the execution of a sales and purchase agreement between PSB and TPPT, and is also subject to approval from shareholders of Tambun Indah.
The acquisition will be funded by the group’s internally-generated funds and bank borrowings. - The Star

Monday, May 19, 2014

E&O awaiting state govt clearance for Seri Tanjung Pinang phase 2 project


Artist's impression of Seri Tanjung PInang phase two.
Artist’s impression of Seri Tanjung PInang phase two.
GEORGE TOWN: The development of Seri Tanjung Pinang (STP) phase two in the north-east coast of Tanjung Tokong here by Eastern & Oriental Bhd’s (E&O) unit, Tanjung Pinang Development Sdn Bhd has entered a critical phase with the company awaiting the endorsement of the state government for its proposed masterplan before it can proceed with the reclamation work.
Although the state had granted an in-principle approval to E&O for the masterplan in 2011, E&O still needs the state’s clearance for the masterplan before reclamation work of the STP phase two can proceed.
The STP phase two project will involve the reclamation of 760 acres of man-made islands and 131 acres of the Gurney Drive foreshore that will be handed over to the state government for infrastructure development of a new expressway, a new Gurney Drive Promenade, and a parallel linear park for public recreational purposes.
It will be the sequel to the 240-acre STP phase one and is expected to have a development horizon of 15 years.
Time is also of the essence as E&O’s concession agreement with the Penang state government to reclaim and develop the land is subject to the completion of the reclamation work by 2019 when the reclamation concession expires. Given that the reclamation for the more sizeable STP phase two will be done further offshore in deeper waters compared with the smaller STP phase one that is closer to shore, the project is expected to incur higher costs and take a longer time.
In a recent interview here, E&O managing director Datuk Terry Tham said the company had submitted applications to the state government with regard to the endorsement of the proposed STP phase two masterplan.
“We can start reclamation only after obtaining approval from the state government, which we hope to obtain by the fourth quarter of this year. Reclamation work is expected to commence thereafter and may take three to five years for full completion.
“We should be on track to meet the deadline for reclamation of 2019 as long as we comply with all requirements set by the regulatory authorities. Development can only start after reclamation work has been completed,” Tham told StarBiz.
The Department of Environment had on April 10 granted an approval in principle for the detailed environmental impact assessment (DEIA) study and conceptual masterplan of the STP phase two project, subject to compliance to conditions set out by the DOE to ensure the project is carried out in an environmentally responsible manner and is consistent with the prevailing regulatory framework.
Tham said E&O was ready to comply with all conditions set by the authorities, which included the necessary requirement of a DEIA study and its approval. “As a responsible developer, E&O has appointed local consultants familiar with local conditions and reputable international consultants with the experience and expertise of reclamation projects worldwide, to verify and help monitor that each stage of reclamation work is consistent with international standards, irrespective of whether it is imposed on us.
Penang chief minister Lim Guan Eng told StarBiz earlier this month that E&O would be given the approval by the Penang state government if it complied with all the technical and regulatory requirements for the project.
“If all the conditions are fulfilled by the developer, the state government will have to respect the sanctity of the agreement, otherwise it will have to pay compensation to the developer for non-compliance,” Lim explained.
If given the go-ahead, E&O will proceed to call for tender proposals for the reclamation work for STP phase two with the actual reclamation work expected to begin only early next year. - The Star

Monday, May 5, 2014

长4.87公里·直通武吉占姆路 槟政府私人界耗3亿建垄尾新路

槟城4日讯)槟首长林冠英宣布,州政府将与私人发展商合作,斥资3亿令吉依山建造长4.87公里的垄尾路新路直通武吉占姆路,为垄尾交通舒困。工程预料4年内竣工,将可以舒缓垄尾路15%车流量。
槟岛市政局工程部副主任拉詹德兰说,是项工程暂命名“米桶山路”(Jalan Bukit Kukus),新路将会与现有的垄尾路平行,工程将以米桶山为起点。林冠英说,新路竣工后,州政府将重新命名。
首长是于周日在实地巡视后,召开记者会指出,垄尾近年发展迅速,人口稠密却只有一条垄尾路作为主要衔接道路。每天约有6万辆汽车取道垄尾路往市区,使到该区长期处于交通堵塞状态。
“民联执政以来,多次向联邦政府提出建造新路要求,但从第十大马计划到2016年启动的第十一大马计划中,建议都不被采纳。州政府不能等,我们只有自己建!”
他说,计划中的新路全长4.87公里,其中1.22公里路段已建竣。槟岛市政局将与私人发展商松林和国云“分摊”,由地方政府和发展商各负担1.5亿令吉,建造余下的3.65公里路段。
建议中的新路,其中还未兴建的依米桶山路有816公尺,山势陡峭和山壁与土地都是石质,增加建筑技术难度,也加重建造成本。后半段则位处山谷,来往方向均建有两条车道。


Saturday, May 3, 2014

Special Report Penang Property: Zooming in on Seberang Perai - Fast-tracking Seberang Perai’s transport infrastructure

PENANG island’s land, sea and air transpor t system is well developed compared with the mainland of Seberang Perai which is almost triple the former’s size.

However, as more restrictions on development on the island emerge — due to cost, scarcity of land and limitations brought about by its hilly landscape and its heritage zones — businesses and developments are beginning to gravitate towards the mainland, where land is plentiful.

A census by the Department of Statistics shows that as at 2010, the population of the mainland was 818,197. This figure is expected to grow to 1.01 million by 2020, and 1.17 million by 2030. This will account for about 53% of the state’s total population of 2.2 million by then.
Meanwhile, a study by the Penang state government shows that about 42.5% of traffic circulates within Penang’s island. On the other hand, 35% of traffic flow is within the mainland. Travel between Penang’s mainland and island accounts for 7% of traffic, while traffic between Penang and other states make up 14% of total traffic.

While the Second Penang Bridge’s concessionaire Jambatan Kedua Sdn Bhd expects the new bridge to siphon some 20% to 30% of traffic from the first bridge, actual traffic patterns with the new bridge have not yet been established as it was only tolled from the beginning of April. Charges range from RM1.70 to RM70.10, with motorists paying a total RM8.50 one way (in comparison, the toll for the first bridge is RM7).

According to Majlis Perbandaran Seberang Perai municipal president Maimunah Sharif, while the traffic situation in Seberang Perai/Prai is still bearable, several locations in Seberang Perai have begun to experience critical bottlenecks. Three of the most affected areas are the roundabout at Seberang Jaya, the Juru Autocity Junction and the exits from the first Penang bridge and the North-South Expressway.

In anticipation of the growth in population and subsequent traffic jams, the state government is beefing up the mainland’s infrastructure to accommodate the traffic surge. It has drawn up a transport master plan for the period of 2013 to 2030 to enhance its roads and bus system, in addition to upgrading its ferries to faster catamarans. These upgrades may cost as much as RM7.46 billion.

“In addition, the proposed construction of roads and new infrastructure are also expected to help overcome traffic congestion in Seberang Perai as well as enhance economic activities in the affected areas,” she says.

These key upgrades include building new connections within the mainland and between the island and mainland. For example, the state government is looking to build the 36.5km North-South Expressway Link Road from Bandar Cassia to Kepala Batas at a cost of RM1.46 billion, and a 7km undersea tunnel from Gurney Drive on the island to Bagan Ajam on the mainland that costs about RM4.2 billion. The state government has signed a preliminary agreement with Consortium Zenith BUCG Sdn Bhd to undertake the feasibility study and design of the tunnel as well as other roads on the island.
In terms of public transport, the state government also plans to build a bus rapid transit (BRT) system in Seberang Perai. The two networks will be from Butterworth to Georgetown (18.7km, RM655 million), and through the southern mainland corridors (23km, RM945 million). So far, there are 22 suggested new routes for the first stage, says Maimunah.

To complement these bus routes, park and ride facilities have also been proposed with seven locations under consideration. These will cost RM200 million.
To enhance this new system, the state government is also planning to create a feeder bus service that links the BRT lines. This will entail restructuring and improving existing bus routes.

In addition, the state also plans to reorganise the ferry services and increase new catamaran service routes from Penang Sentral to Weld Quay in Georgetown, Queensbay in Bayan Lepas, and Gurney Quay. Currently, the ferry service shuttles between Georgetown and Butterworth.

Penang Sentral is a 49:51 joint venture between Malaysian Resources Corporation Bhd and Pelaburan Hartanah Bhd. The 23-acre integrated residential and commercial development in Butterworth is envisioned as a transport hub that will include terminals for buses, taxis and ferries. Penang Sentral will also serve as a stop for the proposed monorail in Seberang Perai and a double-tracking electric rail.

Penang Sentral had an original gross development value of RM2 billion when it was launched in 2007, but owing to funding and land acquisition issues, the project was postponed. Last year, the project was redesigned to fast-track its development and make it more user-friendly,  its project director Imran Muhamad Salim said in a report last November.

Penang Federal Action Council chairman Datuk Zainal Abidin Osman was quoted as saying in March that the development plans for the project have been submitted to the local authorities and are awaiting approval.

How will these projects be funded? Given the sheer size of these undertakings, a number of agencies from the state and federal level will be involved. These are the Unit Pengurusan Lalulintas Bahagian Kerajaan Tempatan and  Public Works Department. Meanwhile, the state government has also applied to the federal government for funding under the 12th Malaysia Plan.



This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly, on April 21 - 27, 2014.

Special Report Penang Property: Zooming in on Seberang Perai - From oil palm estate to new hot spot

FORMERLY known as Batu Kawan, this old oil palm estate used to belong to its namesake, Batu Kawan Bhd (BKB), before the state government gazetted the land under the Land Acquisition Act 1960 in 1990. Following a lengthy legal tussle, BKB was awarded RM15,000 per acre instead of the earlier RM8,167 per acre. BKB’s attempts to raise the  compensation to RM40,000 per acre was thrown out by the Federal Court in 2001 on the grounds that RM15,000 per acre was enough compensation for agriculture land with “remote potentiality” for development.

Fast forward 13 years later and this is clearly not the case. While the place remains largely swathed in oil palm trees with a few homes visible at the fringe, massive changes are in store.  These homes are part of the 3,000 units built by the Penang Development Corporation (PDC), the master developer, mostly for those affected by land acquisition and development, in addition to an international stadium, seafood restaurant, school, reservoir and the Batu Musang jetty.

For starters, PDC has earmarked 6,400 acres in Batu Kawan for a township called Bandar Cassia and has drawn up a master plan. “The development components of Bandar Cassia are housing, commercial, leisure and tourism, institutional, golf resort, theme park medical, educational centre, hotels, parks and all the infrastructure, amenities and facilities required by the investors, workers and residents under this live, work and play concept,” PDC general manager Datuk Rosli Jaafar tells City & Country.

Residential and industrial precincts will coexist. The biggest catalyst of this development is the second Penang bridge, or the Sultan Abdul Halim Mu’adzam Shah Bridge, which was opened in March. It connects Bandar Cassia with Batu Maung on the island.

“With the second Penang Bridge in place, PDC strongly believes that Bandar Cassia will grow by leaps and bounds, and the township can be  developed within 15 years,” says Rosli.

“The development of Bandar Cassia started in 1990, immediately after PDC completed the land acquisition exercise. Since then, the master plan has been updated and aligned to respond to the economic environment and changing demand.”

Due to the two rivers that separate the township from the mainland, water features are an important aspect of the development, which is obvious in the master plan. “Another important principle adopted when PDC designed Bandar Cassia is the preservation of natural features such as mangroves, hill areas and rivers,” Rosli says.

“PDC will work with the investors and businesses to enhance the value of these natural products to achieve a sustainable and balanced development. This is to ensure that these areas are developed with minimal intervention and with adequate and effective mitigation measures.”
In terms of accessibility, Bandar Cassia is a 30-minute drive along the North-South Expressway and Batu Kawan Expressway to Penang Port. It only takes 45 minutes to drive to George Town via the first Penang bridge, while the Bayan Lepas International Airport on the island is only 30 minutes away via the second Penang bridge. In addition, at the northwestern tip of the township is the Batu Musang jetty, which is used by ferries servicing Pulau Aman.

Investment catalysts

Some of the significant developments in Bandar Cassia include IKEA, Penang Designer Village, University of Hull, KDU University College and Penang International Technology Park. Also in the pipeline are an international theme park and a golf resort, while other recreational elements to enhance livability include a sports complex, water sports centre, mangrove park and wellness and spa village.

According to Rosli, KDU University College and University of Hull plan to set up schools of engineering, accountancy, law, business studies and logistics in Bandar Cassia.

“PDC is working closely with investPenang to promote the Batu Kawan Industrial Park in order to attract high-technology and skills-intensive industries to the area. Besides the industrial park, the other development components that can create more job opportunities for the people in Bandar Cassia are commercial, institutional, education and tourism,” he says.

“Penangites have waited for many years for IKEA to open for business. Penang is now proud that it has chosen Batu Kawan as its new base in the northern region. IKEA’s presence is a boost for PDC in its efforts to make Batu Kawan a more attractive place for all to live, learn, work and play.

“Another important project in the pipeline is the premium shopping centre Penang Designer Village, which will be another booster. All these will offer lots of business and leisure activities to the locals, besides attracting tourists from neighbouring states and foreign countries.”

He says PDC is expecting 250,000 people to live in Bandar Cassia. In view of this, some 50,000 homes will be built to cater for all strata of society. They include 11,800 units of affordable housing — 3,372 low-medium cost apartments and 8,428 medium-cost apartments — to be built over 15 years. According to PDC, affordable homes are priced at RM250,000 on the mainland. PDC plans to launch the first phase, comprising 149 low-medium cost apartments and 371  medium-cost apartments, this month.

For residential properties, the average density is around 50 units per acre. To cater for the targeted population, PDC aims to have up to 170 million sq ft of commercial space with an average plot ratio of 3:1 in Bandar Cassia.

“The provision of the infrastructure, amenities and public facilities is based on a population of 250,000 and 170 million sq ft of commercial floor space,” he says.

Besides residential and commercial properties, Bandar Cassia will also feature the 831-acre Batu Kawan Industrial Park (BKIP) in the south. According to Rosli, earthworks for east BKIP (436 acres) have been completed while that for west BKIP (395 acres) is being carried out.

“With a view to promote local small and medium-sized enterprises, phase one of the SME Village will be located in the BKIP,” he says.

Phase one comprises four semi-detached factory buildings, 40 terraced factory buildings and 27 factory lots. The factory buildings are under construction. Phase two, which comprises a service centre, will commence construction soon.

As Bandar Cassia is considered a greenfield site, the ground must be raised above the flooding level before development. The township will be divided into catchments with different development platform levels and land earmarked for monsoon drains to prevent floods.

PDC is now building a number of roads to improve connectivity inside and outside Bandar Cassia. The Bandar Cassia Highway will linked to the second Penang bridge via a cloverleaf flyover within the township. PDC is also building Persiaran Cassia 2 and Lingkaran Cassia Selatan, to the west of BKIP. Up for completion in the second quarter of the year are Persiaran Cassia Selatan 3 and Lingkaran Cassia Selatan.

Besides roads, Bandar Cassia will also provide footpaths and bicycle lanes as well as public transport to connect to centres of activity such as workplaces, parks, service centres  and other neighbourhoods, says Rosli.

“To enhance the connectivity of people, PDC will encourage friendly linkages of buildings through verandahs, linear parks and footpaths. In the design of roads, pedestrians and cyclists will be separated from motor vehicles.”

Bandar Cassia is currently served by 900mm water mains and a reserve reservoir with a 10 million gallon capacity.

Electricity supply to the industrial areas is currently at 33kV, but this can be upgraded to 132kV if required by the industry or development. Rosli says Tenaga Nasional Bhd has begun work on the main intake substation on a 21-acre site, which will be connected to the national grid.  This substation will supply power to Bandar Cassia at 275kV.

The township will have at least four sewage treatment plants, which will be built in modules, with an ultimate capacity of 100,000 population equivalent.


This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly, on April 21 - 27, 2014.

Special Report Penang Property: Zooming in on Seberang Perai - Developers betting on growth prospects

ABUNDANT and more affordable land as well as a large population have attracted more developers to invest in Seberang Perai. There are also more job opportunities in the mainland now as industrial businesses shift their operations there. More young adults have also moved from the island to the mainland as property prices are more affordable there.

As several major projects are set to take off in Bandar Cassia in Batu Kawan, those involved in Seberang Perai’s real estate market are expected to reap the rewards of their investments.

Developers from outside Penang have made inroads into the mainland. They include Sunway Bhd, Mah Sing Group Bhd, IJM Land Bhd, Eco World Development Group Bhd, Malton Bhd, DNP Land Sdn Bhd and Global Oriental Bhd. Meanwhile, the local players include Ivory Properties Group Bhd, Tambun Indah Land Bhd, Tah Wah Group Sdn Bhd and Asas Dunia Sdn Bhd.

According to Ivory Properties chief operating officer Goh Chin Heng, the second Penang bridge turned the mainland into a “different ball game”. He says the mainland has the longest industrial belt in the country and industrial investors are keen to invest there, shoring up demand for housing.

“With a two-car lane and a motorcycle lane on the second bridge, it will definitely bring Penang island closer to Batu Kawan, just like the case of Hong Kong Island and Tsim Sha Tsui,” he says.
Top: DNP Land’s BM Impiana township will also feature an AEON shopping mall that  is scheduled to open in June
Bottom: 
DNP Land’s Jesselton Hills in Bukit Mertajam
Going forward, he expects Batu Kawan to be the new satellite city on the mainland, while Simpang Ampat and Juru will be the new hot spots thanks to the second Penang bridge and new catalyst projects.

“Batu Kawan has the potential to become another growth area, with retail outlets, themed shopping and leisure activities on a mega scale in one area. In the Bukit Mertajam area, Alma Town will be the popular hot spot while Butterworth, Bagan Ajam, Sungai Puyu, Teluk Air Tawar and Sungai Dua will benefit from the undersea tunnel, which is expected to be completed in 2025. In terms of value creation, homebuyers may see a 30% to 40% appreciation but this would be in a longer period compared with the island’s appreciation rate.”

Goh says the island will feature more stratified properties while landed properties will still be preferred on the mainland. Luxury condominiums on the island are priced at RM1,200 to RM1,500 psf, while affordable units are from RM600 to RM800 psf. Meanwhile, affordable condos on the mainland are priced from RM300 to RM350 psf.

“If we make a general comparison of the island and the mainland, the price of similar products of the former is 2.5 to 3 times higher than the latter. Generally, we expect the gap between the two to narrow, especially in the Batu Kawan area as it transforms into a well-planned township.”

According to Goh, the group’s key projects on the island are City Residence, City Mall, Mount Erskine, Penang Times Square and Island Resort. “We have also started the first phase of Penang World City and the remaining phases are in the planning stage.”

On the mainland, it will soon be completing the third and last phase of Aston Villa at Bukit Mertajam. Over at Bandar Cassia, the group and IKEA will be developing an IKEA store and mall on a 245-acre parcel at a cost of RM484 million.

“The main focus of the state government should be to plan and develop the infrastructure, such as the roads and drainage, well. We are glad to see that the state government is welcoming more investors to set up their businesses on the mainland, and we believe that the state will work more closely with the local planning authority to support development approvals.

“Apart from that, the state and relevant authorities should work together on solid waste solution planning as we are expecting a significant growth in the population on the mainland in the near future. The state should also continue playing its role in the development of affordable housing.”

Another company that has made inroads into the state is Mah Sing, with its acquisition of a 76.38-acre tract in Jawi, near the toll of the second Penang bridge. The land will be developed into Southbay East, a township with affordable homes to cater for the middle class. Named after the more upscale Southbay City mixed-use development in Batu Maung on the island, the township has an estimated gross development value (GDV) of RM400 million. It will comprise linked homes, linked semi-detached homes, townhouses and shops. Its first phase will likely feature terraced houses priced at about RM500,000 each, a price point that analysts feel is acceptable for the area. Southbay East will be a gated-and-guarded community with clubhouse facilities.

Notably, this is Mah Sing’s first project on the mainland and its sixth in Penang. The group had acquired the land for RM12.80 psf, which is deemed reasonable compared with similar acquisitions nearby, namely IJM Land’s acquisition of a 70-acre tract at Pekan Sungai Jawi for RM18.50 psf.

IJM Land is planning to develop a small township there, with a preliminary GDV of RM300 million to RM350 million. It already has a township on the mainland, namely Pematang Sanctuary. This upscale freehold 100-acre township mainly comprises 2-storey semi-dees and 2-storey bungalows. Prices range from RM520,000 to more than RM772,000, which translates into a GDV of about RM200 million.

Meanwhile, Eco World has a new freehold project in Bukit Tambun on the mainland. Called EcoTrees, the 58.18-acre development is located near the second link and next to the North-South Expressway. According to a spokesperson, it will have landed and strata properties, with a small mall comprising shops and offices. The first phase is targeted to be launched in 2015.

Meanwhile, DNP Land, a subsidiary of Wing Tai Malaysia Bhd, has projects coming up in Alma, Bukit Mertajam. They are the Mahkota mixed-use development, Sentinelle Ville gated-and-guarded landed luxury homes and Jesselton Hills gated-and-guarded high-end landed homes.

Mahkota will comprise 360 units of serviced apartments with built-ups of 1,156 sq ft onwards and a row of 3-storey shopoffices. The project will come up directly opposite AEON Jusco, which is scheduled to open in June. Meanwhile, Sentinelle Ville will comprise 66 units of 3-storey semi-dees with private lifts. The land areas will be from 34ft by 85ft onwards, while built-ups will be around 3,609 sq ft. Construction has just begun.
Left to right:
Goh: If we make a general comparison of the island and the mainland, the price of similar products of the former is 2.5 to 3 times higher than the latter
Tan: If there is a multi-national company that is coming to Penang, I can assure you that they would not set up their factory on the island
Jesselton Hills will be a 120-acre development with 800 units of 2-storey and 2½-storey semi-dees, bungalows and 2-storey superlink homes. There will be 136 units of semi-dees with built-ups of 2,478 to 2,960 sq ft and land areas of 36ft by 72ft and 39ft by 79ft onwards. Meanwhile, the 198 superlinks will have built-ups of 2,408 sq ft and land areas of 23ft by 75ft.

“You can see a paradigm shift where the population  is moving to this side and the job market [is growing]. If there is a multi-national company that is coming to Penang, I can assure you that they would not set up their factory on the island. [On the contrary], you can see the foreign directi investment really come into the area [Bukit Mertajam, which is on the mainland],” says DNP Land’s senior general manager of property division northern region K C Tan.

“Why did we choose Bukit Mertajam? Mainly because it’s an industrial park and they have done very well here. Many multi-national companies are also coming here.

“The emergence of Batu Kawan definitely inspires a lot of confidence,” he says.

Malton, on the other hand, has entered into a joint venture with landowner Batu Kawan Bhd to develop a 300-acre parcel in Batu Kawan. According to a research note by RHB Research Institute Sdn Bhd, the parcel had a potential GDV of RM3.88 billion as at June last year. The launch of phase one is scheduled for mid-2014 and will comprise shopoffices and superlink homes with a GDV of RM440 million.

Meanwhile, Sunway is developing Sunway Wellesley, an 82-acre freehold development in Bukit Mertajam. Unveiled in April last year, the first phase comprises 31 units of 3-storey shopoffices and has been fully sold. Meanwhile, phase two comprises 154 units of 3-storey townhouses, 60 units of 3-storey semi-dees, and 11 units of 3-storey shopoffices.

According to RHB Research Institute in a note dated Aug 19, 2013, Global Oriental owns 350 acres of undeveloped land in the Bandar Cassia township. The tract has an estimated GDV of RM2.3 billion. One of the more recent launches in the township is Callisia 2, which comprises terraced houses with built-ups of 22ft by 67ft. The houses are priced at RM359,000 and have been fully sold. The research report also notes that the next phase will comprise terraced houses, superlinks and semi-dees in a gated-and-guarded precinct. Indicative pricing is at RM500,000, RM555,000 and RM750,000 respectively. The note also says that Global Oriental plans to build a retail mall once Bandar Cassia’s population grows further.
Top: Bukit Tambun Bottom: Tambun Indah Land’s flagship Pearl City in Simpang Ampat
Tah Wah Group has a 130.5-acre parcel on the mainland, primarily in Bukit Mertajam, Kubang Ulu, Bagan Ajam and Kepala Batas. Meanwhile, it has launched 854 units of 3-storey terraced houses, 3-storey semi-dees, 3-storey bungalows, condos, and 2-storey and 3-storey shopoffices over the past two years. These are located in its Orange Villa, Orange Villa 2, Orange Selayang, Orange Garden and Orange Regency developments.

Tambun Indah Land, meanwhile, has ongoing projects in 101.26 acres of land in Butterworth, its flagship Pearl City in Simpang Ampat, Bukit Mertajam, and Jelutong on the island. They are Carissa Villas, Pearl Indah 3, Pearl Residence, Pearl Impian, phase one of Pearl Avenue, Capri Park, BM Residence, Straits Garden, Camellia Park and Permai Residence. Its cumulative GDV is RM971.6 million.

Its remaining projects worth RM3.8 billion are mostly in Pearl City, with the rest in Bukit Mertajam. They are Taman Bukit Residence, phase 2 of Pearl Avenue, Pearl Harmoni, Pearl Tropika, other phases of Pearl City, and Rain Tree Park 1 and 2.

According to a RHB Research Institute note on March 6, terraced houses in Pearl City have seen their values increase by 10% annually over the past six years, while semi-dees and bungalows have appreciated by 5% to 10% on average.

“This is a good indication of demand for affordable housing. We believe the house price in South Seberang Perai will continue to hold up, given the higher entry cost [namely, land cost borne] by other developers,” it said.

According to RHB Research Institute, Tambun Indah Land is eyeing 40% of buyers from Penang Island this year, up from 28% in 2009. Notably, there are also more buyers from Kedah, northern Perak and Kuala Lumpur, who have most likely been drawn by the growing job market in Penang.


This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly, on April 21 - 27, 2014.

Special Report Penang Property: Zooming in on Seberang Perai - Tapping the mainland’s potential

THE first thing that strikes you when you arrive in Batu Kawan in mainland Penang using the newly opened second bridge is how bare the area is. Plantations and trees flank most stretches of the road running through the town and there are few cars and some houses. Several cleared tracts ready for development can also be seen.

Traffic picks up and more houses and shops appear as you head further inland but it is a far cry from the bustling, congested and more developed island of Penang.

The island has been the state government’s focus for development over the past few decades and it has grown rapidly. Today, it is regarded as one of the most livable cities in the country and a popular tourist destination. Its property market has also thrived, becoming one of the most vibrant in Malaysia.

Be that as it may, the mainland, which is known as Seberang Perai, has been steadily generating a buzz with its growth potential since the announcement of the second bridge in the Ninth Malaysia Plan in 2006. The excitement has intensified with the opening of the bridge, particularly in the 6,400-acre Batu Kawan where the bridge’s exit is located.
The PDC has several high-impact projects in the works in the largely undeveloped Batu Kawan
Seberang Perai, which is split into North, Central and South, is about three times the size of the island and as at 2010, it was home to 818,197 people compared with 708,127 on the island. Some of the towns in the North are Butterworth, Kepala Batas and Bagan Dalam while Alma in Bukit Mertajam and Juru are in Central Seberang Perai. Batu Kawan, Valdor and Bukit Tambum in the South.

Central Seberang Prai is the most mature of the three districts while the South is the least, says Michael Geh, director at Raine & Horne International Zaki + Partners.

But things are changing in the South. “Developers have started buying land there, infrastructure is being developed and major projects are being built,” he says, adding that the stimulus has been the opening of the second bridge.

“The land has always been there, but prior to the bridge, there was no reason to develop it.”

Geh feels, however, that while the opening of the second bridge has spurred interest in the South, this district will take time to grow.

“I keep hearing non-Penangites talking about how exciting places like Batu Kawan are now that the second bridge is open. Such perception … will drive development … but it will not be instantaneous.”

While much work needs to be done, Seberang Perai has several factors working in its favour. The state government, via relevant agencies, has in recent years started rolling out plans to boost the growth of Batu Kawan, including high-impact projects such as the Penang Designer Village, Swedish furniture giant IKEA’s new store, a golf resort, a theme park and a university town. These, coupled with the scarcity of land and high property prices on the island, and ample undeveloped land in the mainland can make Batu Kawan an appealing and cheaper alternative for homebuyers.
Ample cheap land

The mainland has vast tracts of agricultural land for the palm oil, coconut and poultry industries, which in turn create demand for factories and houses, says Tan Chai Liang, director at Izrin & Tan Properties Sdn Bhd.

“With the opening of the second bridge, the mainland’s property market is set to grow. This is partly because development land is scarce on the island while the prices are high. Other factors are an increase in new industrial set-ups and the inflow of investment into the mainland, particularly South Seberang Perai.”

Goh Chin Heng, chief operating officer of Ivory Properties Group Bhd, notes that Seberang Perai has the longest industrial belt in the country and after taking into account the above factors, he believes more industrial players will invest in the mainland. “This will create huge demand for housing, especially in the South.”

According to Datuk Jerry Chan, Penang branch chairman of the Real Estate and Housing Developers’ Association Malaysia (Rehda) and managing director of Asas Dunia Bhd, the price of land in the mainland is about a quarter of that on the island. “The price of prime land for housing on the island ranges from RM800 to over RM1,000 psf while on the mainland, it is difficult to push prices past RM100 psf,” he says.

Geh notes that in general, land prices have increased by about 15% per year over the past five years while Tan believes the highest increase in land prices has been in South Seberang Perai. Nevertheless, land here is still inexpensive compared with that in the more established towns of Butterworth, Seberang Jaya and Bukit Mertajam.

Chan, meanwhile, opines that high prices and the scarcity of land on the island will push more developers and industrial companies towards the mainland.

“You can see far greater industrial expansion on the mainland. It’s not because people are naturally opting for the mainland. It’s because of the shortage of industrial land and land in general on the island. More factories mean more jobs and people go where the jobs are.”
From left to right:
Geh: The land has always been there, but prior to the bridge, there was no reason to develop it
Tan: Houses in the range of RM250,000 to RM500,000 will remain the popular choice for mainland residents
Chan: What you can build on the island and Seberang Perai are two different things
Emerging growth corridors 

The areas that will benefit most from the opening of the second bridge are those closest to it, says Peh Seng Yee, director at CH Talhar Williams (WTW) Penang.

“In the South, we are looking at Batu Kawan, Bukit Tambun and areas along the old trunk road, such as Simpang Ampat, Jawi, Sungai Bakap and Nibong Tebal. These areas are the closest to the second bridge. In the North, Bertam, which has ample land, will see growth.”

Tay Tham, director of Knight Frank Penang, concurs. He adds Alma in Bukit Mertajam to the list of potential hot spots while Shanmughananthan Jeevan Muniandy, managing director of Sri Shan Realty Sdn Bhd, picks Nibong Tebal, Sungai Bakap, Valdor and Simpang Ampat because the price of land in these areas is below RM15 psf.

“The new growth corridor of Batu Kawan-Valdor will become the new property hot spot. Agricultural land with improved accessibility is likely to see its value increase manifold in the long term, but it will depend on the zoning, location, frontage, provision of infrastructure and amenities in the surrounding areas,” says Tan.

Big developers from the Klang Valley have begun to notice the mainland’s potential. Last year, Mah Sing Group Bhd acquired 76.38 acres of freehold land in Jawi for RM12.80 psf; Eco World Development Group Bhd acquired a 60-acre tract near Simpang Ampat for about RM30 psf; and IJM Land acquired a 70-acre tract in Jawi for RM56 million in 2013.

Over in Bukit Mertajam and Bukit Minyak, DNP Land Sdn Bhd (a subsidiary of Wing Tai Malaysia Bhd) has a total landbank of 270 acres with an estimated gross development value (GDV) of RM1.8 billion and Sunway Bhd has its 82-acre mixed-use development Sunway Wellesley.

Penang-based Tambun Indah Land Bhd, which developed the RM2.7 billion Pearl City in Simpang Ampat, has eight acres in Bukit Mertajam with an estimated GDV of RM63.7 million. Tambun Indah has a remaining landbank of 584.56 acres in Pearl City with a GDV of RM3.8 billion. In Valdor, Asas Dunia has a landbank of 1,000 acres.

The area that has garnered the most interest is Batu Kawan, previously an oil palm plantation owned by Batu Kawan Bhd and later acquired by the Penang government in 1990.

The Penang Development Corporation (PDC), which has been tasked with the development of Bandar Cassia in Batu Kawan,  and has its master plan to turn Bandar Cassia into an eco-city. PDC is a state government agency set up to spearhead Penang’s social-economic development.

The PDC has several high-impact projects in the works that are aimed at boosting growth in Batu Kawan. In August last year, it called for a request for proposal (RFP) to buy 190ha in its Bandar Cassia township. Of the 190ha, 87 are designated for a theme park while 60 are for a golf resort. Eco World Development Group Bhd is considered a forerunner to win the bid, which is expected to open at RM45 psf.

Two months later, PDC signed a purchase and development agreement with PE Land Sdn Bhd to construct the RM1 billion Penang Designer Village. PE Land is part of Pan Sarawak Group, which owns and operates The Spring shopping mall in Kuching, Sarawak.

The development, the land premium of which is RM37.94 psf, comprises a shopping mall offering discounted products from luxury brands, a 300-room hotel, several F&B outlets, a landscaped garden and residential units. It is due for completion in three years.

In January this year, it was announced that IKEA will set up a store in Batu Kawan. Ivory Properties Group Bhd and Aspen Vision Development Sdn Bhd have set up a special purpose vehicle — Aspen Vision Land Sdn Bhd (AVL) — to work with IKEA on planning the new township with AVL holding a 49% stake and IKEA 51%. The total cost of the 245-acre tract is RM484 million.

According to Goh Chin Heng, Ivory Properties’ chief operating officer, AVL has signed a joint-venture agreement with Ikano Pte Ltd to develop the IKEA store (100% owned by the Swedish company) on 20 acres; the IKEA mall (70% IKEA; 30% AVL) on 55 acres; and a mixed-use development (20% IKEA; 80% AVL) on 170 acres.

Just last month, Paramount Corp Bhd acquired a 30-acre tract in Bandar Cassia from the PDC for RM65.55 million. The institutional tract was transacted at RM40.50 psf and the development land at RM55 psf. The tract is slated for a university metropolis that will be anchored by Paramount’s KDU Penang and an integrated development.

Malton Bhd has 300 acres in Batu Kawan that are slated for a mixed-use development with an estimated GDV of RM3.88 billion. Phase 1, said to comprise shopoffices and superlink homes, is targeted for launch in the middle of this year.

Also in Batu Kawan, Global Oriental Bhd has a remaining landbank of 350 acres in Bandar Cassia meant for a residential development with a GDV of RM2.3 billion.

Goh says Batu Kawan will be the next satellite city in the mainland while the other upcoming hot spots are Simpang Ampat and Juru due to their close proximity to Batu Kawan.

“Batu Kawan has the potential to become something that has never happened in Penang before — a town where retail outlets, theme parks and leisure activities are all in one place on a mega scale. Another hot spot will be Alma in Bukit Mertajam and in Butterworth, you have Bagan Ajam, Sungai Puyu, Teluk Air Tawar and Sungai Dua after the proposed undersea tunnel is completed in 2025. In terms of value creation, I think buyers can expect an appreciation rate of 30% to 40% but this would be in a longer period compared with the island’s appreciation rate.”

Locations in the mainland will not be the only beneficiaries: property experts have singled out Batu Maung and Balik Pulau on the island. The second bridge starts at Batu Maung, where Mah Sing’s 88-acre Southbay township is located.

Penang-based developer MTT Properties & Development Sdn Bhd has a 300-acre township - Botanica.CT - in Balik Pulau. MTT Properties & Development is the property arm of MTT & Priority Group of Companies.

Balik Pulau, in particular, would be a good choice for those who want to live on the island, but cannot afford the prices in George Town, says Geh.

“The prices of houses in Balik Pulau are about 50% of those in George Town. Many of our buyers are young professionals working in the Free Trade Zone (FTZ) in Bayan Lepas as the distance from Balik Pulau to the FTZ is shorter than if you were living in George Town,” says Angela Teoh, group executive director of MTT.

In fact, says Geh, most people would be happy to live in Balik Pulau instead of Batu Kawan or Bukit Tambun as most prefer to stay on the island where there are more activities and amenities.

Says Teoh, “Having an address in the mainland is not the same as having an address on the island. So, if Batu Kawan is developed with a strong industrial base, I’m sure those who work there will want to live in Balik Pulau.”

A market for home occupiers


The property market in the mainland is traditionally meant for home occupiers, says Geh.

“It’s not for investment or buying a property as a second home. People will buy a home in the mainland first and a second home on the island. I don’t see a reversal of this trend in the future. The mainland will remain a home-occupier market.

“People who move from the island to the mainland are mostly those who want landed property. I personally know people who sell their apartments on the island to buy a comfortable semi-detached house in the mainland,” says Geh.

Landed homes make up the bulk of properties in the mainland as they are still the residence of choice for most Malaysians, especially where land is ample.
The 300-acre township Botanica.CT is being developed by MTT Properties & Development
“The island has more high-end products and prices of landed properties are almost more than double those in the mainland,” says Tay.

“If you were to buy a terraced house in Sungai Ara on the island, it will cost you at least RM800,000. To be able to afford that price, you will need a net income of RM10,000 and obtain a 90% loan with a 35-year tenure. How many people, especially the young, can afford that?” asks Teh Kiak Seng, managing director of Tambun Indah.

Citing Tambun Indah’s Pearl City as an example, Teh says a terraced house in a gated area costs about RM410,000 while a similar house in a non-gated area is about RM370,000.

Geh says property prices have increased over the past five years — around 5% year on year on both the primary and secondary markets. “It has been a steady rise with the secondary market accounting for most of the transactions.”

The upside in Seberang Perai is greater because of the lower land prices, which translate into cheaper houses, says Rehda’s Chan.

“However, I can’t say if the price gap between Seberang Perai and the island is narrowing as we don’t have much to compare with at the moment. What you can build on the island and Seberang Perai are two different things.”

Tan believes the price disparity between the island and the mainland will remain. “The island will become the choice residential area for the wealthy and higher-income group while the middle and lower-income group will opt for more affordable houses in the mainland.

“Affordable landed homes with security services in a modern township complete with amenities and facilities are safer bets to appreciate over time. Houses in the range of RM250,000 to RM500,000 will remain the popular choice for mainland residents.”

Tan also notes that for the price of a condominium of below 850 sq ft on the island (RM400,000 to RM500,000), buyers can own a landed home in the mainland.

According to Teh, there is already an increasing number of buyers from the island. “Last year, some 37% of our purchasers were from the island and the year before that, it was about 20%. This year, we foresee an increase to 40%. More and more people from the island are buying homes in the mainland, especially young couples and professionals because they have no choice.”

Tan and Peh believe that this trend will continue because of affordability, the potential for long-term growth and price appreciation, and the increased accessibility via the two bridges.

While Shanmughananthan agrees that this trend will continue for some time, he believes younger buyers, in particular graduates, will eventually buy properties on the island when they have more money. “The island simply has more to offer and is a more prominent address.”

Room for improvement


While the mainland has growth potential, there is still a reluctance to live there. Rehda’s Chan says much of this can be attributed to the state government’s lack of focus on the mainland.
A commercial and housing part of Butterworth
“We have the same government, but you can see how different the island and mainland are. The island is cleaner and much better developed. The same kind of effort has not been put into the mainland for a long time. So, are we going to finally see the ugly duckling turn into a swan?” he asks.

“On the island, people are complaining about the congestion and high property prices. I’d tell them, here’s an alternative, why don’t you buy a house in the mainland instead? It’s cheaper, it’s not as congested and for the same amount you pay for a small apartment on the island, you can get a nice landed property.

“If I were the government, the first thing I would do is even things out in the mainland. There is much room for improvement.”

Knight Frank’s Tay believes many Penangites on the island are reluctant to move to the mainland because of the good living environment on the island with its array of eateries and shopping centres. It’s easier to get around there and there are fewer foreign workers.

“The heavy industrial sites are mainly in the mainland, so there’s much more noise and pollution,” he says.

“The island is more vibrant and it is well known as a tourist destination. When people say they want to go to Penang, what they mean is the island. The mainland has its strengths too — less congestion and more affordable housing — but you have to create appeal and make it a more desirable place to live,” says Peh.

Geh feels that the state government should lead the charge in developing the mainland. “The government should be the catalyst to get the ball rolling, which it has started to do on its land [Batu Kawan]. Now [it should focus on] the rest of the mainland.”

Chan says the first thing the state government needs to do is to make the mainland as livable as the island.

“George Town is one of the more livable cities in the region, but what about the mainland? You should aspire to be the best, but you should strive to be the best across the board, not just in one area. If you look at Singapore, whatever they do and aim for is across the board.”

All the consultants agree that infrastructure and public transport need to be looked into.

“Infrastructure and public transport are insufficient. The mainland is a vast area with a lower population density than the island. Priority has always been on the island’s public transport due to tourism,” says Tan.

Tay concurs, noting that at present, the number of buses and taxis in the mainland is insufficient.

“The infrastructure bottleneck in Batu Kawan is a key concern as the existing trunk roads are unable to cope with the sudden influx of vehicles and need upgrading. There is also a need to have new links to Batu Kawan as well as the smaller towns of Sungai Bakap, Jawi, Simpang Ampat and Nibong Tebal to cater for increased investment and industrial activities,” says Tan.

According to the Seberang Perai Municipal Council (MPSP), based on a study before the completion of the second bridge, about 20% to 30% of the traffic from the first bridge was expected to move to the second bridge.

“As the second bridge was opened not long ago, traffic census and traffic flow patterns on the second bridge and in the vicinity of Batu Kawan have yet to be fully identified. However, based on our monitoring, an increasing number of vehicles is passing through Jalan Bukit Tambun and Bandar Cassis since the second bridge opened,” says an MPSP spokesman.

MPSP agrees that there is a need to improve the infrastructure and public transport, and several projects have been put in place towards this end in the Penang Master Plan 2013-2030. They include road widening and upgrading exercises costing more than RM1.2 billion; a bus rapid transit system from Butterworth to George Town and in the South’s corridors; and an extension of park and ride facilities.

Other than livability, infrastructure and public transport, Tan and Tam feel that there is a need to have better zoning and planning for industrial, residential and commercial developments.

“The state government should expedite the implementation of the local plan for South Seberang Perai and unveil the master zoning plan for Batu Kawan to ensure more transparent and coordinated planning and development strategies. At the end of the day, equal focus should be given to the mainland to promote balanced and sustainable development within Penang,” says Tan.

With careful planning, coordination and implementation, the mainland has a bright future and one that is a long time coming.


This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly, on April 21 - 27, 2014.