Thursday, May 31, 2012

Mah scouting for additional land with potential GDV of RM1.4bil


KUALA LUMPUR: Mah Sing Group Bhd is aiming to acquire additional land with a potential gross development value (GDV) of RM1.4bil this year.
“We have acquired land with GDV of RM3.63bil so far this year, which is about 73% of our target of RM5bil. We have seven months to go, and we definitely have to lock in more land to fuel our long-term growth,” said group managing director and chief executive officer Tan Sri Leong Hoy Kum on the sidelines of the Invest Malaysia 2012 conference.
This year, Mah Sing has acquired land for projects consisting of M Residence 2 in Rawang, Sutera Avenue in Kota Kinabalu, and Southville City which is a planned 412-acre township in Bandar Baru Bangi.
Leong pointed out that Mah Sing currently has 39 residential, commercial and industrial projects across Greater Kuala Lumpur, Johor, Penang and Sabah, with remaining GDV and unbilled sales of RM18.2bil.
The group's executive director Steven Ng Poh Seng said 70% of the remaining GDV would be from projects in the Klang Valley.
Ng also pointed out that the group has unbilled sales of RM2.48bil as of March 31.
“In acquiring more land, we also make sure we juggle our cash flow well and that the group's net gearing does not exceed our internal target of 0.5 times,” said Ng.
Ng said the group's net gearing was still manageable even after the recent RM333.26mil acquisition of 412 acres targeted for a mixed township near Bangi, Selangor.
“We have four to five months to pay for the land. Then we have about RM300mil cash coming in (from delivery of vacant possession of property units). Our gearing is always very manageable because of our quick turnaround business model.” Presently, the group has a land bank of 1,538 acres.
“Even now, we have enough land (to develop) for the next seven to eight years,” said Leong.
As at May 15, the group has achieved property sales of slightly above RM1bil, which is 40% of its 2012 sales target of RM2.5bil.
The bulk of sales were in the Klang Valley (82%), followed by Johor Baru (10%) and the balance from Penang.
Leong said he was “selectively optimistic” regarding the property market this year.
“We need to fit supply to demand. For example, we focus more on mass market products priced below RM1mil such as small serviced residences or link homes,” said Leong.
He also said the group was exploring potential opportunities in the region. - The Star

Unhappy over compensation


GEORGE TOWN: Residents of an estate in Mount Erskine are not satisfied with the compensation offered by a housing developer that bought the land there. It is learnt that the developer had issued a letter of eviction to the residents last month.
Residents association chairman Teh Kim Long, 74, claimed that the compensation of between RM30,000 and RM60,000 offered to the residents, was less than half of the current property value.
“Residents were given the option to accept the money or get a flat with a built-up area of 55.7sq m (600sq ft),” he said, claiming that 62 residents were affected by the development.
Teh claimed the residents wanted to pay the quit rent to the developer but the latter did not want to receive the payment.
“It is stated behind our quit rent receipt that if the quit rent is not paid in six months, the residents would lose their right to voice out their concern and cannot object to any changes conducted by the land owner,” he claimed during a press conference at Pulau Tikus assemblyman Koay Teng Hai’s service centre in Jalan Peirce yesterday.
Teh said that the residents were confused as they are unsure as to who they should pay their quit rent.
“We have engaged a lawyer to collect our quit rent and seek his service to hand over the quit rent to the developer.
“Several residents have paid their quit rent to the previous land owner as they fear they might lose their right,” he said.
Koay said according to the land office, the ownership of the land was transferred to the developer on Jan 5.
“I have also called the developer to convey the wishes of the residents last month,” Koay said.
When contacted, the developer refused to comment on the matter. - The Star

CM rapped over hillside development


GEORGE TOWN: An MCA state leader has criticised Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng over the latter’s statement that more stop-work orders have been issued against hillside development by the current state government.
State MCA Wanita chairman Tan Cheng Liang (pic) said Lim, who is also the DAP secretary-general, had “conveniently avoided” revealing the increase in number of protests in the state since 2008.
“He boasts about more stop-work orders being issued now compared to when Barisan Nasional was helming the state government.
“However, he failed to reveal that there have been more protests by Penangites against hillside development since Pakatan Rakyat took over.
“The latest is the chorus of dissatisfaction by residents of Mount Pleasure in Batu Ferringhi, objecting against approval accorded by the Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) for the construction of 21 four-storey villas and 80 two-storey bungalows there,” she said.
She said the 2008 DAP general election manifesto unveiled by Lim promised to “preserve our forest, wetlands and bio-diversity” while Pakatan Rakyat’s common policy framework stressed that the “environment must be preserved for the sustainability of future generations.”
“Just six weeks ago, Lim said in a speech that the Pakatan government was proud of its record of not approving any hillside development.
“However, the voices of disapproval by Penangites are evidence that Lim, the DAP and Pakatan are deceptive,” she claimed.
Citing examples, she said on April 8 this year, Sungai Ara residents protested against approval issued by MPPP Planning Department for two hillside development projects and in February 2009, Tanjung Bungah residents protested and submitted a memorandum calling on the state government to ban all current and future Class III and Class IV hillslope development projects.
“In view of these protests and to deliver the DAP and Pakatan’s pledge to protect the environment, I challenge Lim and the state government to issue a stop-work orders against all hillside development projects approved by MPPP,” she said in a press release yesterday.
Tan also took a swipe at Lim for focusing on luxury residences but allegedly had no regard for the poor.
“Approvals are given for exclusive housing and condominium projects on hills, but scant attention is given to low-cost housing for the poor where no low or medium cost units were constructed between 2008 to 2011,” she claimed.
On Tuesday, Lim said more stop-work orders had been issued by both local councils since 2008 compared to previously.
He said this proved that the state government was “more stringent in upholding the rule of law, demanding strict compliance with technical requirements and more unforgiving than Barisan.” - The Star

Road link project to start soon


THE project to complete the Jalan Bukit Kukus/Jalan Paya Terubong link will start some time next year, said Penang Public Works, Utilities and Transport Committee chairman Lim Hock Seng.
“Presently, the road stops dead in Jalan Bukit Kukus. The state will acquire the necessary land to complete the project.
“The state also applied for funds to upgrade the stretch of road from Jalan Paya Terubong to Relau but this was rejected by the Federal Government,” he said.
Lim, who was speaking to reporters after launching an ‘Update on Construction & Contractual Issues in Malaysia’ seminar on Tuesday, said a paired road from Majestic Heights to Bukit Gambir would also be built.
On the bus crash in Jalan Tun Sardon on Friday, he said the stretch where the accident occurred was well-maintained with ample signboards, guardrails and other safety items.
He said: “Incidentally, the Jalan Tun Sardon stretch was recently identified as the second best maintained road in the country by the Public Works Department.” - The Star

Area Plan bids to rejuvenate George Town


THE implementation of the BIDS (Business Improvement District Scheme) will result in a cleaner, safer and more accessible George Town.
Think City Sdn Bhd, which introduced BIDS to stakeholders around the Komtar area in December 2009, has come up with an Urban Design Guideline and an Area Plan for the redevelopment of the city, said its senior fellow Dr Neil Khor Jin Keong.
“At the time, each of the stakeholders approached the Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) with their own (separate) plans, wanting to contribute towards a better and more connected environment.
“The council was unable to adopt any one plan so we proposed BIDS — an innovative way to achieve the regeneration of the area.
“The Area Plan we showed was a community proposal and we have included ideas for programmes and events after rounds of consultations with the stakeholders, a public exhibition and surveys were conducted,” he said.
George Town BIDS Sdn Bhd was incorporated recently as a special purpose vehicle to implement the BIDS Area Plan.
Dr Khor said a manager and executive would be hired by next month to oversee the implementation of the BIDS Area Plan recommendations.
“The implementation of George Town’s BIDS will be the first in Asia covering a boundary area of 34.5ha. It is expected to improve connectivity through creative methods like green corridors, shaded walkways and a shuttle service which will result in a cleaner, safer and more attractive business and family-oriented district.
“Connectivity, a prerequisite as it ensures accessibility, will work in concert with a strategy to turn green spaces and urban plazas into congregational spaces,” he said.
Among the recommended measures are the use of green technology and sustainable practices such as rainwater harvesting, composting for businesses with organic waste and harnessing solar power at pedestrian shelters.
Dr Khor added that BIDS must recognise heritage values and be inclusive and people friendly.
Think City is the secretariat for BIDS. Feedback on BIDS can be sent to bids@think-city.com.my. - The Star

Sia Boey resurrection?


THE state government is mulling over a proposal to bring the old ‘Sia Boey’ — formerly Penang’s oldest wholesale market — back to life under the Komtar Phase 5 project.
Among the ideas mooted by Think City Sdn Bhd senior fellow Dr Neil Khor Jin Keong were to have a cultural centre, library, residences and shoplots in the area.
Sia Boey on Lebuh Tek Soon, is part of the Komtar Phase 5 project which also encompasses Jalan Dr Lim Chwee Leong and Jalan Maxwell.
Comprising five phases, the Komtar project undertaken by the Penang Development Corporation (PDC), was launched in 1974.
“Think City is the secretariat for BIDs (Business Improvement District Scheme).
“Our work scope is solely to look at public areas but we were requested by PDC to give our input on the (privately-owned) Komtar project,” he said.
Dr Khor was speaking during the BIDs presentation to Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng last Thursday.
Lim said the state government wanted more green spaces and public areas for people to converge.
The rejuvenation of ‘Sia Boey’ was also part of Barisan Nasional’s alternative blueprint for the development of Penang.
MetroNorth had reported last week that the proposal to turn the island into an international tourism hub would include a ‘Sia Boey’ town square concept to capture the feel of old Penang.
Clearing the surrounding waterways to allow small boats to enter from the clan jetties in Weld Quay to the old market spot, taikong in traditional costumes rowing boats, a floating market and the setting up of stalls selling popular local dishes and trendy coffee outlets, were among the suggestions.
In March last year, State Local Government and Traffic Management Committee chairman Chow Kon Yeow announced that the Penang government would adopt the BIDs to rejuvenate the inner city.
BIDs committee chairman Datuk Rosli Jaafar, who was present at the press conference, said working closely with the Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) was crucial for BIDs’ success.
“BIDs is not just about physical development and programmes but it’s also about getting the surrounding businesses to utilise their respective budgets in a way that can have a bigger collective impact and benefit,” Rosli, who is also the PDC general manager, said. - The Star

槟城中华游泳公会 面对千万元公寓发展献议


(槟城29日讯)发展有价,历史悠久的槟城中华游泳公会面对千万令吉高楼公寓发展献议?
据本报探悉,座落在丹绒武雅的槟城中华游泳公会因地皮有价,在多年前即有人献议将地皮改为超级公寓发展项目,唯计划引反弹,面对阻力,无疾而终;事隔多年后,有人旧事重提,继续对计划兴趣盎然,再次提出时引来争议。
据了解,在地皮有价,尤其是丹绒武雅地寸土如金下,槟城中华游泳公会毗邻的超级公寓Skyhome的地价相信天文数字计,任何的公寓单位都可以上百万令吉转手,成为投资黄金地皮。
据知,有关计划是由土地持有信托人,即槟城中华游泳公会置业有限公司(CSC Prop)提出,在计划下该占地数依格地将改为高楼,而中华游泳公会将在其中划分的面积上继续提供会员服务,有关公寓的收入或将作为援助游泳公会的发展。- 光华

中路及玻璃池滑8层变二十多层 槟多区打破高楼限制


(槟城29日讯)槟州民联政府一改前朝政府作风,为解决土地有限问题,大胆打破高楼限制,多个区域已开始出现大楼拔地而起。
其中,在乔治市中路已开始打破前朝政府定下的8层楼高度限制格局,市政局在308后即批准多栋高楼计划,其中一栋高楼已快竣工,从乔治市头条路可远眺发现有关高楼开始与升旗山山脉天际线抢高,而另一栋22层高楼也开始大兴土木,即矗立在民政党槟州总部对面的一片地。
民联一改前朝作风
在民政党总部约200公尺的一栋英殖民地式建筑,在不久前夷平以建造公寓,建筑格局将超越原有8层楼。此外,在玻璃池滑也面对同样情况,令当地民联议员头痛的是,在308大选前引起争议的一片停车场空地,将打造成27层楼商业大楼,令原本对郭庭恺寄以厚望的选民感无奈。
除了上述27楼的商业大楼,在不远约500公尺外的广东民律,也同样将矗立一栋32层楼超高大楼,同样打破该区8层楼格局。- 光华

槟中华游泳公会地皮 或发展成星级酒店


(槟城30日讯)槟州中华游泳公会黄金地皮或发展为星级酒店!据本报探悉,报导指中华游泳公会面对超级公寓拨地计划方案外,槟州中华游泳公会置业有限公司也接获打造星级酒店计划书,然而置业有限公司(CSC PROP)也向公众及会员发出“定心丸”,任何的发展方案都将不会造成产业的管理及拥有权易手他人,产业将继续掌控在置业有限公司手中。
据了解,槟州中华游泳公会在5年前在会员代表大会上已原则上通过中华游泳公会发展,同时也通过拨款一笔500万令吉作为迎合上述发展的用途。据来自置业有限公司的消息告诉本报,有关计划方案是在槟州中华游泳公会前主席郑添诚领导下在会员大会上通过,而之后置业即接获不少的投资献议书,其中计有公寓和酒店及提升游泳公会设施等。
据了解,尽管有关方案在多年前提出,唯因为面对建筑成本高涨,尤其是钢铁起价,所以计划并未能积极推动,他承认提出献议的公司在积极的游说置业有限公司推动计划,然而由于中华游泳公会为公家产业,所以必须小心行事。据表示,置业有限公司了解到任何的发展必须建立在双赢方案下,唯不能妥协的是,有关土地不能转手,不能成为私有产业,该公司必须继续牢控产业的管理及所有权,这也意味地皮不会面对易手问题。针对计划的可行性,据了解,其中酒店计划可能符合公会初期提供外坡及参赛者栖身所的便利,中华游泳公会在早期有提供外坡及参赛者住宿,然而可能设施不比星级酒店,后来沦落为学生住宿所在。
消息指,一旦发展规划酒店,中华游泳公会会员将继续以会员资格享有游泳设施便利及服务外,酒店计划也将迎合中华游泳公会初创时期提供住宿便利的宗旨,一举两得。据了解,任何的计划必须确保中华游泳公会的存在,会员将继续享有更好的便利,比如更好的泊车空间、更良善的基本设施等,只会在计划下为会员提供改善设施福利,而不是改得更坏。据悉,置业有限公司即在多年前在会员大会通过发展方案前,即为中华游泳公会的泳池进行修装,修补破损的泳池瓷砖等。据知,有人针对置业有限公司提出的发展有异议一事,不过,该公司相信一些方面可能对计划所知有限,不过,可通过会议上坦诚公布了解,而置业有限公司继续以开放方式来听取各方面的献议报告。消息指,迄今置业有限公司尚未针对任何计划作出决定,一切只是纸上谈兵,八字也没一撇。- 光华

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Penang not beholden to developers, says CM


GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Government has denied claims that it is “the darling of developers” at the expense of the public, especially those in need of public housing.
Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said more stop-work orders had been issued by both the local councils since 2008 compared to previously.
He said this proved that the state government was “more stringent in upholding the rule of law, demanding strict compliance with technical requirements and more unforgiving than Barisan Nasional”.
“Under Pakatan Rakyat, the Penang Municipal Council issued 259 stop-work orders from 2008 till 2012 which is nearly seven times more than the 38 stop- work orders issued for the same period (between 2004 and 2007) under Barisan.
“The Seberang Prai Municipal Council issued 11 stop-work orders from March 2008 until May this year, whereas not a single stop-work order was issued from 2003 till March 2008 by the Barisan government,” he said.
Lim said the state government was business-friendly, provided rules were complied with.
Dismissing allegations that property prices in the state rose due to increased land premiums, he said the land conversion rates were the same as they were under the previous Barisan administration.
He said the rise in property prices was due to rising public confidence in the state government’s competency, accountability and transparency administration as well as market forces.
“To ensure sufficient affordable housing, the state government has allocated a minimum RM500mil to build 18,000 affordable homes.
“Unlike in Johor, where a bungalow in Iskandar costs RM3mil and can be bought by foreigners including Singaporeans, Penang has imposed a limit on all property purchases by foreigners beginning July 1,” he said in a press release yesterday.
Lim said he was responding to claims allegedly made by Barisan against the state government recently. - The Star

Flood woes to end in Taman Kota Permai


FLOODING problems in Taman Kota Permai, Bukit Mertajam, will be over soon when Sungai Pasir, which runs through the housing estate, is deepened and its bunds raised.
Penang Agriculture and Agro-based Industries and Flood Mitigation Committee chairman Law Choo Kiang said the 1.85km project costing about RM120,000 would begin at the end of July and be completed in about two months.
“The shallow riverbed is causing the downstream water to overflow onto low-lying areas. That causes flooding during rainy seasons,” he said after visiting the site near SJK (C) Beng Teik in Taman Kota Permai on Friday.
Also present were Padang Lalang assemblyman Michael Tan Cheong Heng, Seberang Prai municipal councillor Oon Neow Aun and Drainage and Irrigation Department officials.
Law said the state had spent about RM12.5mil on flood mitigation projects in Bukit Mertajam in the last four years.
He said a similar project to resolve flooding problems in Taman Sungai Rambai and Taman Makok had been approved with a cost of about RM3mil. - The Star

Mah Sing “selectively optimistic” on property outlook


KUALA LUMPUR, May 30 — Mah Sing Bhd, Malaysia's second largest listed developer by sales revenue, said today that it is upbeat on only selected segments of the property market.
This comes after property analysts said that sales would slow this year following tightening measures by Bank Negara to curb speculative buying and put a lid on household debt.
"We are selectively optimistic on certain segments," said Mah Sing's founder and group chief executive Tan Sri Datuk Sri Leong Hoy Kum. "We must fit supply to demand."
He said that segments that were expected to do well due to customer demand were the small units of service residences and link homes in townships.
He also said that homes costing above one million in gated and guarded communities would also do well.
Property analysts had said that Bank Negara's new guidelines for lending would cool a property market that had run up substantially over the past two years.
They also noted that loan approvals and applications in February had fallen 27 and 18 per cent respectively from last year's peak.
Mah Sing said that it is still scouting for land that can be turned around quickly and is suitable for development that meets market demand.
The group acquired several new projects this year with a gross development value of about RM3.63 billion.
It posted sales of slightly above RM1 billion as at May 15 or 40 per cent of its full year target of RM2.5 billion.
Leong said that he expects minimal impact from the new minimum wage policy as construction is awarded to contractors on a lump sum basis inclusive of labour.
He also noted that labourers are paid between RM60-80 per day which is already higher than the proposed minimum wage of RM900 per month.
Mah Sing posted sales of RM2.26 billion last year, the second highest of any listed developer. - The Malaysian Insider

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

国阵宣布槟港口有限公司 圈定北海打造免税特区


(槟岛西南区28日讯)槟州能否恢复自由港地位尽管未有定案,槟州国阵乘势宣布第二项好消息,即槟城港口有限公司已在北海圈定地点打造关税、移民及检疫大厦(CIQ)免税特区。
槟城港口有限公司主席拿督斯里希尔米透露,该公司已拟定初步计划,并已将有关建议呈给财政部。一旦CIQ大厦计划成事,根据初步预计,将为槟州人民带来10万份就业机会。他指出,根据勘察,建议中的地点还有近3000英亩的可填海地段,能够迎合CIQ大厦的发展需求。不过他强调,由于填海事项归州政府管辖,所以要是国阵重夺槟州政权,CIQ大厦计划相信能更快落实。他于周一在槟州国阵工作委员会会议后,在记者会上如是透露。希尔米也是槟州国阵工作委员。
外国产品免税
希尔米指出,计划中的CIQ大厦也能集合清真产品中心、修船厂和进行自由贸易活动,届时在大厦免税特区内交易的外国产品将一概免税。他说,届时来自东盟国家的产品将免税,随着马来西亚与澳洲签署“自由贸易协定”,未来也将免税,至于来自中国和其他国家的产品则需征税,但要是在本地加工的产品则获得免税。
“槟州国阵主席邓章耀宣布恢复槟州自由港地位的建议,相信最终能够实现,不过现在我们继续努力,通过CIQ大厦计划以制造更多商机和就业机会,带动槟州经济。” - 光华

Monday, May 28, 2012

Mixed views on land acquisition in a cooler market


PETALING JAYA: Research analysts and property consultants have mixed views about developers that have been buying sizeable parcels of land recently, as the real estate market has slowed down and prices are relatively reasonable.
“It is a good time to acquire land when the market is slow. Some property developers may just be able to get a bargain price for their purchases,” said property consultancy CB Richard Ellis (M) Sdn Bhdexecutive director Paul Khong.
Khong told StarBiz via e-mail that real estate sellers would also be more realistic concerning prices, as there were not too many buyers around.
He pointed out that the property sector was moving slowly back to a “buyer's market” and the principle of “cash is king” would rule again.
In recent months, property developers such as Mah Sing Group BhdSP Setia BhdWCT Bhd and Hua Yang Bhd have been actively expanding their land bank particularly in the Klang Valley.
Last week, Mah Sing announced that it was paying RM333.26mil or RM18.55 per sq ft for 412 acres targeted for a mixed township near Bangi, Selangor.
SP Setia recently acquired 21.3 acres freehold land in Penang for RM185.6mil, and said this was for a mixed residential development project with a gross development value (GDV) of RM1.1bil.
Meanwhile, WCT recently acquired two parcels of 468 acres and 57 acres in the Klang Valley.
WCT executive director Choe Kai Keong had told StarBiz that the land costing RM450mil has a potential GDV of RM5.2bil.
The 468 acres in Rawang, Selangor would be developed into an integrated township with an estimated GDV of RM1.2bil, while the 57-acre in Overseas Union Garden in Kuala Lumpur is planned for a mixed development worth RM4bil.
Hua Yang also has been acquiring small parcels of land in the Klang Valley since last year.
Hua Yang, which is known for developing residential properties in the affordable segment, recently agreed to pay RM15.2mil for 21 acres of freehold land in Ipoh, Perak.
“Prices and sales of properties have obviously slowed down in 2012 as the number of buyers has been halved, with stricter bank lending guidelines. This is rather sensitive in the mid-high and high-end segments (such as above the RM3mil category) of the residential market,” said Khong.
Khong said property developers were now moving quickly to look at larger land banks to develop new projects, and were looking at cheaper locations where there was still demand from the mass market in the mid and lower-mid sections.
“Landed properties especially in the RM2mil and below categories should still do relatively well, as investors will still continue their quest but at a slightly lower segments.”
He also noted that the recent land sales were centred in secondary locations outside the city centre, but were in reasonably “good locations” and were in respect of big parcels where the developers could develop the “evergreen” landed segments again.
Khong pointed out that regardless of market conditions, property developers needed to take a long term view about their land bank.
“They have to continue to acquire land and develop, to sustain their operations and cover overhead costs.”
However, one property analyst contacted by StarBiz said there were concerns that developers might be too aggressive in expanding their land bank.
“In good times, when the property market is hot, developers can increase their gearing without much worry as they can launch and sell properties quickly. Now, the market has cooled and they should be careful about increasing their gearing too much,” he said.
Maybank Investment Bank (IB) Research said in a recent report that it took a neutral view of SP Setia's recent land buy in Penang.
“Despite its strategic location, the RM200 per sq ft land cost (in Penang) appeared to be on the high side. It is 33% to 60% higher than the RM125 to RM150 per sq ft asking or transacted prices in the area.”
However, Maybank IB noted that SP Setia's net gearing was still very healthy, as this was expected to increase to 0.14 times post-acquisition of the Penang land (from 0.08 times as at January 2012).
Meanwhile, Kenanga Research said it took a neutral view of Mah Sing's recent land buy near Bangi as the deal is expected to result in the company's net gearing reaching 0.6 times (from the 0.3 times in the fourth quarter of 2011), based on an assumed 70:30 debt-equity financing.
“This has exceeded our comfort level of 0.5 times net gearing,” said the research unit.
However, Kenanga Research said Mah Sing's expected net gearing of 0.6 times is manageable amd should fall below 0.5 times over the next two quarters, on the back of continuous billings. - The Star

SP Setia to to buy RM1bil worth of land in Klang Valley, Penang and Iskandar Malaysia yearly


ST PETERSBURG (Russia): SP Setia Bhd is allocating RM1bil yearly to acquire new land for future development in the Klang Valley, Penang and Iskandar Malaysia.
President and chief executive officer Tan Sri Liew Kee Sin said replenishing its landbank in the shortest time possible would place the company in a better position compared with other developers.
He said the move was vital as the company would be able to continually launch new projects as the takeup rate for its properties was good.
“Sufficient landbank is the life-line for us (developers) without which we could not properly plan our future projects,” Liew said after SP Setia's award winning development Setia Eco Gardens in Iskandar Malaysia bagged the FIABCI Prix d'Excellence award at a ceremony held here recently.
Winner again: (from left) Liew, FIABCI world president 2011/2012 Alexander Romenanko, FIABCI Prix d’Excellence 2012 president Laszlo Gonczi and St Petersburg Committee for Construction chairman Vyacheslav Semenenko at the awards ceremony.
The 2012 FIABCI Prix d'Excellence Awards saw 14 winners from seven countries, namely Malaysia, Singapore, India, Taiwan, Russia, Hungary and Switzerland.
Liew said that among Kuala Lumpur, Penang and Iskandar Malaysia, getting new land in Penang was the most difficult due to the space constraint there.
He added that those who managed to get land in Penang would go for high-density projects.
“In the Klang Valley, the next growth centres will be within the Kajang and Semenyih areas,'' Liew said.
He said the upcoming My Rapid Transit system would help boost property development projects outside the existing development centres in the Klang Valley.
With the better accessibility and connectivity within the central region once the MRT system is completed, developers have started looking for land in new development centres.
He said prospective buyers, mostly the first-time houseowners, would consider buying their first residential properties outside the existing growth centres as the prices were within their reach.
On south Johor, Liew said Iskandar Malaysia would drive the property market in Johor many years down the road based on the progress and development taking place in the corridor over the last six years.
“Iskandar Malaysia is more viable compared with other economic growth corridors in Malaysia,'' he said.
Liew said the Johor property market also benefited from Iskandar Malaysia as demand for high-end residential properties was on the rise in south Johor.
He said that apart from the Iskandar Malaysia factor, Singapore also played an important part in determining the economic growth in Johor.
“It is a well-known fact that Johor and Singapore are intertwined in economic activities during good or bad times due to their close proximity,'' said Liew.
Liew said the company was fortunate as all of its projects in southern Johor were strategically located within the flagship development of Iskandar Malaysia.
Its ongoing projects are Bukit Indah with only 5% land left for development from the entire 610.67ha, Setia Eco Gardens and Setia Business Park (383.64ha and 50% still available for future development).
Others are Setia Business Park II (107.24ha), Setia Tropika (299.46ha and 40%), Setia Indah (359.36ha and 10%) and Setia Eco Cascadia (110.70ha and 70%).
“We'll continue looking for more land in south Johor,'' he adds.
Liew said the remaining landbank would keep the company busy in Iskandar Malaysia in the next 10 to 15 years with a gross development value of RM8bil.
He said on average, land prices in Iskandar Malaysia had appreciated when the company first came 15 years ago, the asking price was RM5.50 per sq ft and now it was between RM15 and RM20 per sq ft.
Liew said the opening of the Eastern Link Dispersal Expressway in April and upgrading of several roads within Tebrau corridor had improved connectivity and accessibility.
Meanwhile, Setia Eco Gardens won its second FIABCI Prix d'Excellence Award within three years.
Setia Eco Gardens had in 2009 won the FIABCI Prix d'Excellence award in Beijing for Best Master Plan.
This year it emerges as the winner in the Specialised Project (Purpose Built) category for Eco Greens beating Green Pyramid and Ocenarium of Hungary and Taiwan's Taipei City Hall Bus Station Project.
Eco Greens is a 11.33ha park complex in Setia Eco Gardens comprising a town park and the famed Eco Gallery, which features a green wall that has become an iconic landmark for the 383.64ha township.
SP Setia is the only Malaysian developer to have won four FIABCI Prix d'Excellence awards Setia Eco Park in Shah Alam won for Best Master Plan (2007) and Best Residential (Low Rise) Development (2011) and Setia Eco Gardens for Best Master Plan (2009) and Specialised Project (Purpose Built). - The Star

新关仔角红树林 或筑走道成海上公园


(槟城27日讯)新关仔角的红树林已开始长成,或在未来被开发成为筑有海上走道的观景公园,来槟游客在用餐后可穿梭走道在海中欣赏海景!
郑雨周:望大选后有眉目
也是丹绒武雅区州议员郑雨周透露,他已向州政府建议将丹绒道光Marina Bay公寓后方及新关仔角合您购物广场及G酒店前红树林地相串连,以在未来开辟成为红树林海上走道及观景,成为海上公园。他表示,在2009年已向州政府提呈计划,有关计划也后期加添不少新元素,然而他承认有关计划迄今还只是处于纸上谈兵,尚未获得政府积极看待,计划上路也无期,只寄望可在大选后会出现眉目。
郑雨周表示,在提议下将在红树林进行规划出海上的走道,在海上架起木桥穿梭进入红树林伸入海中,游人可在海上架起的观景平台上望海欣赏日出等活动,有关计划或须百万令吉打造。他表示,有关计划已交彭文宝行政议员以便交给州政府认真考虑及执行,在计划下他建议迎合红树林成长地型拟定出海上走道,这可参照其他国家的做法,只要划出范围执行起来并不难,它将可发展成为一座海上式的公园。
在问及上述红树景观可能会遮挡新关仔角海景时,郑雨周认为,红树林走道将成为新关仔角的海景带来附加价值,旅人可在用餐后步上走道欣赏红树及海景,一举多得,此外新关仔角的海景不再只是海上景观,绿油油的长成红树林将成为视觉上的一种享受。针对新关仔角的红树林开始长成,郑雨周表示,红树的生存率是五十对五十,在此前人为种植的红树林面对海潮冲走的命运。而他不排除红树长成后面对人为破坏的可能,在先前于东方海鲜舫的红树即有7至8颗的红树遭人砍伐,对此他表示州政府将不会姑息有关行为。-光华

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Seeing is believing


EARLY this week, an article from wire service Reuters highlighted the perils of buying properties in an unfamiliar country. The article, datelined London, was about British developers and house builders promoting their projects in Asia as a result of strict lending guidelines drying up demand among Britons.
StarBizWeek has also featured quite a number of articles about the British property market since 2009. Like stocks, bonds and other asset classes, property is another form of investment. While some may prefer to invest locally, others may invest abroad.
But whether it is Britain, Australia, Singapore or Malaysia, developers anywhere work on the same principle and that is the need to sell in order to generate revenue, in both good and bad times.
The world, with the exception of Asia (for now), is going through difficult times and this is expected to last quite a while. There is no end in sight for the eurozone crisis for many months to come, at least. That is why developers and house builders are promoting and marketing their projects in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia more aggressively than before.
Kuala Lumpur is a relatively new market for them as their normal destinations prior to 2009 have been Hong Kong and Singapore. When it comes to overseas property investments, the people in Hong Kong and Singapore have been there before us.
But despite that, buyers from the former British colony have discovered that they have bought into projects based on misrepresentation.
According to the Reuters article, an investor bought into a project which he believed was “a 40-minute walk from central London.” It turned out to be “a 40-minute journey by high-speed train!”
Another bought into a project that was located on Kensington High Street. The brochure alluded to the proximity of the High Street Kensington underground station.
Some of these projects could well have been promoted here. In both these cases, there would be non-issues had the investors flown to London to see the actual site for themselves, check out the accessibility and the stations that may or may not be there.
In the case of 375 Kensington High Street, on the map that came with the beautifully printed and obviously expensive brochure, the nearest tube station seems to be Olympia. But while Olympia is along the tube line, the train only stops there during public holidays, weekends and when there is an event at the exhibition hall which is located nearby. The train does not stop at Olympia during a weekday. One will not know that based on the information provided by the map alone.
Secondly, to allude to the project being near High Street Kensington may be a bit of a stretch because the two nearest tube stations are West Kensington and Hammerstein, according to a source who used to live there. When 375 Kensington High Street was marketed in Kuala Lumpur, a thick glossy publication was given to potential investors.
Kensington Street is a long road and on which end the property is sited is important. The local equivalent would be Jalan Ampang, which begins from Lebuh Ampang, passes the KLCC to Ampang Point to the deeper corners of Ampang.
Some of Malaysia's most prestigious properties are located there and less prestigious ones as well with the KLCC as the central point of reference just as High Street Kensington tube station being the point of reference.
If one has the inclination to buy into a project that runs into hundreds of thousands of ringgit or RM1mil or more, it seems only logical to check out the area before signing on the dotted line. That holiday, which costs a fraction of the investment, will give clarity to the investment, and peace of mind.
While there, one may also request to see other properties by the same developer. Besides misrepresentation, it has been brought to our attention that some projects may not yet have got the necessary financing. British banks will only lend to developers after a certain portion of sales have been formalised.
Some projects have been marketed in Asia with the hope and aim to achieve that sales target. Lack of financing may lead to delays.
Some projects are promoted as having yield of between 5% and 6%. According to an agent, well located properties have yield of between 3% and 4%. The further away, the higher the yield. Properties in Kajang, for example, would be cheaper than those in Petaling Jaya and the yield from that Kajang house would be higher (annual rental/price).
This does not mean London is not a good property investment destination. On the contrary, the EPF have bought into some landmark buildings there. It would not be fair, therefore, to tar with the same brush all properties promoted here. Indeed, some exceptional properties have arrived on Asian shores. But like companies that do due diligence before investing, individuals too must do likewise. Whether it is Melbourne, Singapore or London, or even a project here, wouldn't checking out the site be the first thing to do? - The Star
Deputy news editor Thean Lee Cheng suggests it is time for some Malaysian investors to take a working holiday in Britain, if they have not done so already.

Look at the fine print in guaranteed rental returns


CALL them what you like leasebacks, buy-to-let, cash back, own-for-free developers have come up with creative plans to woo investors with guaranteed rental returns (GRRs) on yet-to-be-built properties.
Developers would agree to pay buyers rentals ranging from 8% to 12% per annum or a proportion of the purchase price for a certain length of time.
This kind of purchase, which has become increasingly common judging from the press advertisements, sounds enticing to investors who do not want the trouble of managing their own investments. You buy the property, and you get the rental returns thrown in.
While GRRs could be very attractive, investors need to know that the scheme is not as simple as it seems, much like ads that appeal to our desire to lose weight quickly, get rich fast or strike the lottery.
Realistic rentals
If a developer is offering GRRs, the buyer has no way of knowing whether that property is going to achieve the promise in the open market. The developer may not be able to get the guaranteed rent or the property may not be let out at all during the guaranteed period.
Pitfalls
Generally, GRRs are best for the laidback investor. Some people will value the “simplicity” of the deal. However there are issues that buyers have to be aware of and comfortable with before entering into such agreements.
A typical mortgage lasts 20 years. If you have a guaranteed rental for just three years, what will happen for the next 17 years? You are left to sink or swim on your own.
A typical table of returns will show potential buyers a surplus income. A potential investor has to take into account the cost of maintaining the property, the taxes that come with being a property owner, the cost of maintaining the mortgage and all other fees related to acquiring the property.
Under most GRR schemes, you will need to buy a furniture package with the apartment and commit yourself to the management charges and sinking fund of the building, on top of the regulatory quit rent and assessment tax.
These will often take a substantial bite out of any rental money left each month.
GRRs are specifically aimed at selling units to investors, so you may see a situation of 500 apartments all going to the rental market rather than owner-occupiers at the end of the scheme. You will need to consider how many people will be chasing tenants at the end of the guarantee period and most particularly how many prospective tenants there are.
In areas of high competition, landlords will have to reduce the rent to attract available tenants. Consequently, the market value of the properties will go down rather than up.
If you decide to sell, you will also be limited to buyers who will also be mainly investors. Sellers will also find themselves competing with developers who are offering higher rental returns with new developments.
Overpricing When supply is more than demand, developers always look for ways to avoid having to reduce prices. While GRRs may offer attractive secure returns, it will be a false economy in the long run if the buyer ends up overpaying for the property.
A guarantee is only as good as the company who underwrites it. Even if the GRRs seem reasonable and are offered with honourable intentions, investors need to be sure that the developer would be able to sustain the returns if the rental or sales market were to take a turn for the worse. If developers were to default on the payments due to buyers, these buyers will likely default on their respective loan repayments, thereby setting off a chain of events with dire consequences.
Terms and conditions in GRR agreements are not regulated by law. As such, the inexperienced investors may not understand that the fine prints are often written in the guarantors' favour. Example of such clauses:
“Provided always and it is hereby agreed between the contracting parties hereto that the Developer reserves its right to terminate the GRR agreement for any reason whatsoever by giving TWO (2) MONTHS written notice to the Purchaser wherein such a case the Developer's obligation to pay the guaranteed return to the Purchaser shall cease from the date of such termination. Such notice is deemed to have been received within three (3) days from the date of the letter”
Purchaser's nightmare
Quite sometime ago, we received an email from an observer who was at a developer's office. He narrated this incident where he witnessed an elderly Ah Pek who had just taken “vacant possession” of his investments, comprising four units of apartments with a GRR scheme. He was demanding that the developer “take back” the units and give him a full refund on the purchases.
The Ah Pek had discovered that the four units he purchased under the developer's GRR scheme had depreciated in value by 25%. To rub salt to the wound, the developer had terminated the GRR scheme as allowed in their agreement, leaving the Ah Pek frustrated with his “failed” investment. The elderly Ah Pek wept in full view of all present at the developer's office! Did the “generous” developer give the Ah Pek any refund? Your guess is as good as mine.
In another case reported in the local papers two years ago, a group of investors filed a legal suit to claim from the developer whom they alleged had breached their agreements. They were practically throwing good money after bad. Win or lose, lawyers collected their fees upfront.
Buyers beware
The rental market is volatile, depending on current competition and market conditions. People investing in these schemes are not just buying properties that they hope will increase in value in time, but also using “other people's” money (from rentals) to pay for the purchase. It is, however, a cyclical market, and one is subject to the laws of supply and demand as in any other sector of the economy.
GRRs offered to investors should be checked carefully against the local market and competition. A simple survey within the location will give an investor a fair idea of the state of the local market. If market prices are lower than the proposed rent, incentives and discounts being offered to woo the buyers, then this are issues to be considered. If guarantees of rentals are higher than the existing market rate, then a rent decline after the end of the guarantee is likely. It is a classic case of caveat emptor rental guarantees can sometimes guarantee investors nothing but heartache.
Anyone who has any real estate experience knows there is no such thing as a guaranteed rental. Real estate, as with any other type of investment, has its ups and downs. There are times when one cannot rent out. Any developer or any person (mind you) who says that he is able to predict the future is “bluffing.”
Our economic cycle goes through cyclical changes that response to economic and other happenings in, as well as, outside our country. Projected monetary returns that cannot be guaranteed (or self-guaranteed) are doubtful in nature.
Had it been so profitable, don't you think that the developer, their shareholders and related companies would have snapped them up before being available in the market? Why don't they keep it for themselves? Guaranteed returns should be accompanied by documentary proof of a trust account nothing more nothing less.
Chang Kim Loong is the honorary secretary-general of The National House Buyers Association, a non-profit, non-governmental, non-political organisation manned by volunteers. For more information, checkwww.hba.org.my or e-mail info@hba.org.my