Saturday, August 11, 2012

Are developers really making too much?


LATELY, there have been many ongoing discussions on the topic of high property prices. It made me ponder on the various causes that might have contributed to the situation, including the question of whether developers are making too much.
As I took a sip of tea, many thoughts came to mind which I found interesting and worth sharing before we dwell further into the real factors of rising property prices.
Based on annual reports (see chart) of three major property developers in Malaysia, namely SP SetiaUEM Land Holdings and Mah Sing Group, they are generating an average of 18% profit margin from their projects, and at the same time incurring a staff cost of about 7% of their total revenue.
These companies are major developers in mass residential properties which have high sales turnover, and therefore a good reflection of the average developers' profit margin in the residential market.
These findings may contrast with people's perception of the profitability of the property development industry.
Though it may sound like a fantasy, assuming I could convince these three property developers to give back their entire profit to their customers, it would mean an average of 18% discount on property prices for the year in question.
This would seem like a fantastic bonanza for the buyers of the properties in question. But would a 18% discount really make these properties affordable? I would imagine that people will still find these properties expensive.
Let's take an example of a terrace house that costs RM700,000 in Petaling Jaya. It would be priced at RM574,000 after the 18% discount.
If a home buyer is able to secure a 90% loan with a maximum repayment period of 30 years, the monthly loan instalment for RM700,000 and RM574,000 would be RM3,081 and RM2,526 respectively (based on a BLR-2.4% loan package with current BLR at 6.6% per annum).
From the above example, while the discount may seem substantial at absolute price, it is not significant in terms of monthly loan instalment for home buyers.
The debt commitment level for the latter is still considered high and out of reach for most people especially those who have just started their career.
Now, let's take a hypothetical scenario that the property developers decide to make their staff work for free that year.
It would mean another 7% discount to customers after deducting staff cost. Even with this total discount of 25%, property prices in many areas would still be considered unaffordable to many.
Anyhow, back to reality, it is impossible for any commercial enterprise to work for free or give up its profit if it was to run a sustainable business, as well as to satisfy its shareholders' expectations.
For the property development industry which has a product life cycle of four to six years (starting from land acquisition to handover of keys to customers), it is a challenge to further compress the profit margin after taking into account the risk and inflationary factors involved in such a long product life cycle.
Let us look at other industries as a comparison and review their profit margins.
For the banking industry, the three largest local banks that were selected are MaybankCIMB and Public Bank. Likewise, the three major players from the mobile telecommunication services were AxiataMaxisand Digi.
The results showed that the average profit margin for the banking industry is 35%, while the mobile telecommunication industry is enjoying an average profit margin of 26%. So, back to my question “are developers in Malaysia really making too much?”
Compared with the average profit margin of the banking and telecommunication industries, the profit margins of property development companies are significantly lower and definitely not on par in terms of the actual profit before tax figures.
Putting aside the profit margin for property development which is already relatively low compared with the other two industries, what are the other factors that are causing high property prices?
Many other underlying factors could be looked into in relation to the escalating property prices, instead of merely contemplating the issue as a market trend or as a result of developers' profits.
The Government, property developers, home buyers, as well as NGOs (non-government organisations) will need to work together to identify the root causes of inadequate supply of affordable homes in Malaysia.
Let's ponder this issue over the next few weeks and I welcome any suggestions and feedback to shed some light on it as I dwell further into this crucial topic in my next article.
 FIABCI Asia-Pacific chairman Datuk Alan Tong has over 50 years of experience in property development. He is also the group chairman of Bukit Kiara Properties. For feedback, please email feedback@fiabci-asiapacific.com.

Friday, August 10, 2012

Union Investment Real Estate to double investment in M'sia

KUALA LUMPUR (Aug 9): Germany-based Union Investment Real Estate is confident of doubling its investments in Malaysia, from the current RM440 million.

"We are optimistic about the medium term growth prospect of Malaysia's real estate, which explains our investment in Malaysia," managing director Ulrich Dischler told reporters here on Thursday.

In 2007, Union Investment entered the Malaysian market by acquiring Cap Square Tower in Kuala Lumpur from Bandar Raya Development Bhd for RM440 million.

"Cap Square Tower is an important investment for the fund, as it is in line with our strategy to grow our Asian portfolio, through yield accretive acquisitions in stable markets which are supported by sound economic fundamentals," he said, adding that the building currently enjoyed 40 per cent occupancy.

He said Union Investment was also confident of earning a green building index certificate next year for its Cap Square Tower.

Dischler said Malaysia's sound economic fundamentals augured well for its real estate sector and that it was one of the fastest growing economies in Asia.

"Although real estate investment in Malaysia is still at its infancy stage, this presents more opportunities as well as options for value-addition.

"As a core investor with a long term investment horizon, we are confident that Cap Square Tower will benefit from the positive rental reversion in tandem with the progressive growth of the Malaysian economy," he said.

On its plans in Malaysia, he said: "Our strategy is to acquire existing buildings. We are tracking the market and currently there is no specific project that we are negotiating. Of course it also depends on the price expectation."

Dischler said over the next five years, Union Investment also intends to invest up to Euro one billion in the Asian growth markets on behalf of its global real estate funds.

"We remain optimistic about the medium to long term growth prospects and we anticipate rentals and prices to pick up again in 2013-2014.

"Our confidence stems from Asia's robust economic fundamentals, which includes its youthful demographic, dynamic workforce, rising income levels, growing consumer base, sound public finances, sizeable external reserves and healthy corporate balance sheets.

"This would underpin the healthy and sustainable growth of rentals and capital values across Asia's real estate markets," he added. — Bernama

Thursday, August 9, 2012

Reducing traffic blues


PLANNING for Phase Two of the road upgrading project on the island by the Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) is expected to start next year.
Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said that RM30mil would be allocated for the projects aimed at alleviating traffic congestion on the island.
“Since the six packages under Phase One worth RM28mil are scheduled to be completed by 2013, the planning for the next phase will start following the end of the first phase,” said Lim who marked the completion of the Jalan Gottlieb and Jalan Bagan Jermal road upgrading project with a brief ceremony at the site yesterday.
The upgrading of Jalan Gottlieb and Jalan Bagan Jermal involves expanding the road to five lanes, thereby increasing the road capacity.
The project, which is worth RM3.5mil, commenced in November 2011 and was completed in July.
“Besides that, the walkways were upgraded and a bicycle lane added,” said Lim.
The first package to be completed was in July 2011. It involved the upgrading of the Lorong Batu Lancang and Lebuhraya Thean Tek intersection.
Smoother flow: Jalan Gottlieb after the upgradeSmoother flow: Jalan Gottlieb after the upgrade
The RM300,000 upgrade was completed in three months and it provides a free-flow left-turn for northbound traffic on Lorong Batu Lancang towards Lebuhraya Thean Tek.
The second package involved the upgrading of the state mosque interchange to provide additional lanes, plus more right-turn lanes into Jalan Air Itam.
The RM1.2mil upgrade which commenced last August was finished in January this year.
Of the three remaining packages, only the upgrade of a part of Jalan Masjid Negeri from Jalan Delima to the Udini Roundabout had begun in April and is expected to be completed in 18 months.
It involves the upgrading of the Udini Roundabout to provide free-flow U-turn for northbound traffic.
The other two packages which are scheduled to start in September and November respectively are the road widening works at Jalan Air Itam and upgrading of Lorong Batu Lanchang from Lebuhraya Thean Tek to Jalan Masjid Negeri.
Both the projects amount to RM8.5mil.
Also present at the ceremony yesterday was MPPP president Datuk Patahiyah Ismail. - The Star

Court orders villagers to move out


GEORGE TOWN: Three villagers in Kampung Pondok Upeh, Balik Pulau, have been given a month to vacate their homes for a residential development project.
Sessions court judge Zainol Rashid Hussain ordered M. Jagadeesan, Quan Yam San and O. Arumugam to deliver vacant possession of their homes to the developer, Evergreen One Development Sdn Bhd.
He also ruled that Evergreen One was to pay the trio, represented by counsel Yusmadi Yusoff, a total of RM72,000.
Met outside the court, Yusmadi, who is also Balik Pulau MP, said the defendants would appeal to the High Court against the decision.
“I will also file for a stay of execution,” he said yesterday.
It was reported in August last year that six households in Kampung Pondok Upeh would seek legal redress against eviction notices served on them to vacate the land.
The notices were issued on May 21 after the developer was vested with power of attorney by the two owners of the land at Lot 485, Mukim 6, in the Southwest District.
The plaintiff claimed that the defendants had no rights to the land, as well as rights to ask for compensation.
Yusmadi said hearing for the three other defendants would continue on Aug 14. - The Star

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

耗资3000万解决槟交通阻塞 明年展开道路提升工程


(槟城7日讯)槟岛市政局即将在明年陆续展开耗资3000万令吉的第二阶段道路提升工程,并计划在槟岛交通黑区寻求解决方案,包括提升交替路线、U转、加宽道路、增建天桥等,以解决交通阻塞问题。
槟州首长林冠英表示,“第二阶段的工程将在明年开始进行策划,包括提升丹绒道光路、垄尾路、拿督依斯迈哈欣路、武吉甘密路、敦林苍祐大道等,以解决交通阻塞问题。”他周二早上在哥德路的工程竣工开幕礼致词时,这么指出。
他说,第一阶段的道路提升工程已在2011年开始进行,耗资2800万令吉,其中一些项目已在施工、公开招标、设计阶段和规划当中,目前已动用了2100万令吉。他说,槟岛市政局在近期也一直提升交替路和双车道设施,以解决交通阻塞问题,及让公共交通可更良好的通行。
他 说,目前也一直积极提升槟州的公共交通系统,包括“猫巴士”、提升巴士站,及人行道等工作,希望一并解决交通问题,而槟城快捷通公司也会在明年增加100 辆全新的巴士。他指出,为了让道路提升计划更加完善,已获资格鉴定的公司,将被邀请参与槟岛市政局的征求计划书计划,而此项计划将在10月15日截止。- 光华

拟『居家办公室』新条规 槟明年落实升级发展


槟城7日讯)一种自由、弹性及新型的工作生活模式即在槟州“升级”发展,槟岛市政局正草拟“居家办公室”(SOHO)实事项目的条规,料明年贯彻落实。
届 时,任何有关办公与商业综合项目或发展都必须依据市政局新条规建设,以确保相关概念的素质,以及在不影响住户的大前提下全面落实。槟岛市议员黄则松周五受 访时表示,“SOHO”概念源自纽约曼哈顿,早在1980年代在大马的各大城市包括吉隆坡和雪兰莪州(1990年)已朝向这方面的发展,即在同一个单位底 下,年轻企业家可以在更宽敞、舒适和弹性的环境下同时工作和居住。“拟定条规或准绳,包括所需的设施和条件才能让SOHO建筑工程更加完善和普及化”,他 认为,这项家庭和办公室合并概念所需要的空间不会很大,不过却非常方便。
“除了鼓励更多的年轻人以更低的成本创业外,也能有效的解决槟州交通问题,同时这也是槟州迈向商业化发展的趋势”,他相信,一旦有了更加“清楚”的条规,不但能够限制相关的发展项目,也帮助引进更多的外资。
为 此,他解释,“SOHO”概念深受年轻人和外籍人士的爱戴,市场上的需求也逐年增加,槟城几项较大的项目包括时代广场和葛尼百丽宫都是迈向“SOHO”建 筑的最佳例子,他说,尽管“SOHO”在槟城开始普及,不过市局方面一直没有设限,导致一些外国投资者欲在槟城投资相关项目时而有所忧虑。- 光华

光大第5期计划地标建筑 被评太“摩登”不符世遗


(槟城7日讯)拟议在光大第5期计划地的“外太空飞行船”式摩登地标建筑,相信是槟州政府继升旗山缆车站的“飞机终点站式”突兀遮棚计划受挫腰斩后,另一项引起非政府组织非议的“摩登”设计方案。
 槟 州首长林冠英于上周宣布搁置多时的光大第5期发展计划地,将改为“古迹广场”(Heritage Square)计划。计划含盖修复失修的老建筑同时复原港仔墘运河,引来赞许,然而计划中同时包括在头条路及德顺路交界三角地带盖起摩登5层大楼,同时拆 除数栋老建筑,却招人诟病。
陈耀威:像外太空飞行船
槟城文史工作者陈耀威建筑师受访时,将上述5层楼新建筑比喻为“外太空飞行船”,不只砍断了世遗区及非遗区的城市纹理外,新建筑更与周边建筑格格不入,极不协调,将沦笑柄。
 他 表示,单从肉眼看,有关设计让他差点“晕倒”,有关设计完全没有文化遗产保护概念,同时忽略了有关地区重建的重要性。有关地区原是光大第5期的重要一块, 先是原租户及居民遭前朝政府规划发展逼迁,在民联执政后,一些建筑於3年前又遭强行拆除,造成租户及居民树倒猢狲散。- 光华

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

林冠英向新港居民派定心丸 双威城计划过关无望


槟城6日讯)槟州首席部长林冠英再次向新港居民派定心丸,承诺民联执政一天,新港双威城计划(Sunway City)无望过关,居民大可安枕无忧。他是在出席于周日举行的“槟城论坛”会上针对新港一名沈姓女居民提出忧虑时,如是表示。
沈女士担心一旦全国大选尘埃落定民联继续执政后,有关计划或死灰复燃,然林冠英说,若有关发展商在槟城只推行单一计划,那么政府或面对困境,然而若有关发展商在槟城尚有其他计划等着开跑,那么他相信发展商不会与政府对着干。而在新港计划下,首长说居民大可放心,计划在民联执政一天肯定不会上路。
另一方面,首长承认第二大桥在明年开通后将对槟城带来严重交通问题。
首长表示在解决交通问题上槟州政府完全无助(helpless),即使是峇六拜大道也是联邦政府权限,槟州政府要无法管制,即使是这些道路出现窟窿,州政府也不能进场修补。- 光华

Monday, August 6, 2012

Rising rental yields


HERITAGE buildings in George Town continue to draw investment interest, with renovated shophouses in the heritage core and buffer zones chalking up an increase of 50% to 100% in rental value since last year.
But is all this rush to cash in on tourist dollars resulting in unsafe buildings that do not meet fire safety regulations?
In Penang, a“heritage building” refers to pre-war structure, such as traditional Chinese shophouse, built before 1945, the year World War II ended.
For a long time, the rental yield of old shophouses was rather low, typically fetching a couple of hundred ringgit for residential use and several hundred ringgit for business use.
In George Town, shophouse property can either have residential or commercial status within the same street.
Better yield: Old shophouses like this row along Jalan A.S. Mansoor have greatly appreciated in value in more ways than one.Better yield: Old shophouses like this row along Jalan A.S. Mansoor have greatly appreciated in value in more ways than one.
But in recent years, with the increase in low-cost flights to the island and the influx of tourists — bother domestic and foreign — new investors have been attracted to establish mainly boutique or budget hotels in shophouses.
A check on online property portals reveal that typical shophouse property in the prime commercial areas of George Town are not longer within the RM1,500 to RM2,000 rental range but at least RM3,000 per month.
Tenancy agreement
Previously, we have reported on the steep rise in the value of heritage buildings in George Town due to the new-found demand for property with a bit of history and architectural appeal.
So many to preserve: Lim says there are 5,439 buildings and sites identified and deemed to be of heritage value.So many to preserve: Lim says there are 5,439 buildings and sites identified and deemed to be of heritage value.
And the latest news is that such increases have prompted stakeholders — especially clan and religious associations that own many such properties — to re-evaluate their rental agreements with tenants. One business affected by the rise in property value is the Alpha Utara Gallery established by veteran artist Khoo Sui Hoe, 73. Located in a renovated, pre-war shophouse at Lebuh China, the gallery has been operating there for the past eight years.
“My rent was RM2,000 when I first started here,” explained Khoo, who has been an ardent promoter of art in Penang.
“But with the nature of this business, it will be hard to keep up with any increase.”
However, according to Khoo, he wasn’t even informed of any rent increase.
He was only told that the association wanted to terminate the rent agreement and take possession of the premises. Apparently, others were waiting in the wings. Khoo will move out by the end of September.
Word in the neighbourhood is that such a splendid double-storey shophouse in Lebuh China, near the Kwan Im Teng Temple, can fetch at least RM4,000 a month.
According to an informed source, even RM4,000 is considered reasonable, as there are properties nearby, up for rent at between RM5,000 and RM6,000 monthly.
For instance, a newly-completed triple-storey, shophouse property — spanning three adjoining units — is commanding rent of RM12,000 a month. The tenancy agreement purportedly extends to 25 years and the cost of restoration is being borne by the tenant.
However, not all shophouse property located in George Town can fetch such prices — not yet anyway. The popular areas for new businesses seem to be centred on the heritage core zone and buffer zone where tourists throng.
Love Lane
While Jalan Chulia and Lorong Love (Love Lane) have long been favoured by backpackers in the past, more chic and pricier lodgings and eateries have sprouted within and beyond the inner city neighbourhood.
Even the early “heritage” enterprises such as the Little Shanghai Heritage Row at the junction of Jalan Nagor and Jalan Bawasah have been overshadowed by recent developments closer to the heritage zones.
Typically, many of the old buildings located in areas such as Lebuh Armenian, Jalan Muntri, Lebuh China and Lebuh Pantai (Beach Street), have been converted into trendy cafes, restaurants and art galleries as well as “boutique” or “budget” hotels with a couple of “Homestay” establishments joining the bandwagon.
Even places further afield from the heritage zones such as Jalan Hutton and Jalan Clove Hall have relatively new businesses in heritage buildings.
Within the past year, more tourism-related enterprises have mushroomed, including along Jalan Pintal Tali (Rope Walk), Lebuh Campbell, Lebuh Cintra, Jalan Masjid Kapitan Keling and Lebuh Noordin.And soon to join the ranks will be new business establishments at Lebuh Melayu, Lorong Ikan, Lorong Lumut, Lorong Stewart, Lebuh China and Jalan A.S. Mansoor (Jalan Sekarat).
What has been mentioned, refers mainly to old shophouses converted to lodgings with limited accommodations ranging from five rooms to a dozen or two, depending on how many adjoining shophouses are involved.
St Giles
Incidentally, dwarfing all these little “boutique” developments will be IGB Corp Bhd’s St Giles Hotel being built on five lots facing Traders Hotel along Jalan Magazine, a road parallel to Lebuh Noordin. The 31-storey building will have 576 rooms. It will be managed by Cititel Hotel Management. But St Giles will be marketed at a higher class than Cititel.
Commercial use
Anyway, buying or investing in an old shophouse is one thing. The hassles begin when the owner or stakeholder tries to restore or renovate the property for a business venture. There are so many confusing and conflicting regulations involving regulatory bodies, including the local municipal council, Fire & Rescue Department (Bomba) and even George Town World Heritage Incorporated.
Applying for a permit to restore your property — especially if it is located within the heritage zones (core and buffer) — could take at least eight months to a year. This is despite all the talk about the local authorities’ one-stop approval centre.
If you want to apply for a change of status from residential use to commercial use, the process is long and tedious. Actually, first and foremost, you have to submit all your architectural plans to Bomba for approval. And Bomba’s requirements may not necessarily conform to heritage conservation guidelines.
A property owner on Lebuh Melayu complained that it took him two long years to get the approval to convert his shophouse to a hotel. Apparently, his building and material costs went up three times while waiting. Other property owners who try to do things the right way have complained of illogical requirements.
One property owner was made to build a enormous water storage tank in his shophouse property that took up half his kitchen space. He was also asked to provide parking space in front of his shophouse property along busy Lebuh Campbell, an impossible requirement.
When challenged to show the actual bylaw requiring this, the official concerned could not respond.
Those who have yet to be issued a renovation permit have also complained of harassment when they try to dispose of rubbish from their newly vacated property.
One owner at Jalan Pintal Tali was recently told that clearing rubbish also require a permit!
Bomba
Nevertheless, a visit to Bomba Penang headquarters in Prai revealed that certain property owners of heritage buildings in George Town have not renovated or restored their property to conform to fire safety regulations. This is simply because they did not apply for Bomba’s approval.
According to Bomba Penang director Azmi Tamat, 55, owners wanting to convert their property to commercial use have to abide by the regulations stipulated in the Uniform Building Bylaws 1984 that apply everywhere in the country.
“We understand the situation of property owners, but not all heritage properties can be approved for use as hotels or restaurants,” said Azmi, a veteran of the fire department for the past 35 years.
“We don’t want a situation in which a tourist or anyone is killed in a fire in one of those boutique or budget hotels. We have to adopt preventive measures before such a situation occurs. And the regulations are clearly spelt out under the bylaws,” pointed out the fire chief.
Two exits
He said that any property for hotel use must have two exits — front and back. The maximum distance to the exit is nine metres. And the staircase must face the front entrance. This is contrary to the traditional layout of a shophouse where the staircase faces the back.
Wall and flooring material must be fire retardant or resistant, which means that the floor boards on the upper level have to be underlaid with such a material. Doors have to be fire-rated and must be able to withstand heat and flames for at least one hour.
Azmi explained that during an emergency, local workers may be familiar with the building structure and escape, but a visitor especially a foreigner, may not find a way out. Also, a fire victim could also be easily overcome with smoke.
Architects
Owners of old shophouses should adopt both active and passive measures to prevent fires from occurring or spreading, advised Azmi.
Besides installing smoke, heat and fire detectors as well as a smoke extraction system, hose reels, emergency lights, exit signs and fire extinguishers, the staff of commercial premises must attend a course on emergency response conducted by Bomba. A company representative such as the receptionist, chef or security staff need only attend the three-day class once. The participant is then expected to train his or her own colleagues.
Said Azmi: “We know that operators of hotels in heritage buildings don’t make that much and we sympathise with them, but where lives are at stake, we can’t take chances. Their qualified architects know the requirements and procedures, therefore, they should submit their plans to us to ensure everyone’s safety.”
But like everything else, there is a loophole in the law that allow owners of residential property to operate their “hotel” business. And it is perfectly legal but we shan’t go into that.
And just how many “heritage” buildings and sites are there in George Town?
World heritage
According to George Town World Heritage Incorporated (GTWHI) acting general manager Lim Chooi Ping, 45, there are 5,439 buildings and sites identified and deemed to be of heritage value. These are classified under four categories of importance.
Under Category I, there are 93 properties including buildings, gateways, cemeteries and historical sites. Sixty-nine of the properties are located in the heritage core zone.
Category II has 4,048 properties comprising mainly shophouses. They are evenly distributed within the core and buffer zones.
Under the category of “infill development” there are 585 sites identified as vacant land or temporary structures where “compatible” re-development is permitted. They are mainly located along the waterfront between Lebuh Beach and Pengkalan Weld (Weld Quay).
And under the “replacement” category, there are 713 buildings deemed to be without any significant value where sensitive re-development is permitted.
Thumbs-up
As a private company set up by the Penang State Government, GTWHI has no actual powers to enforce any perceived flouting of rules and regulations. However, the company’s representative sits on the approval board of the local council which vets permit application for restoration or renovation projects, especially those located within the heritage zones. They can give the thumbs-up or thumbs-down should they have any objection.
A town planner by profession, Lim has been seconded from the Municipal Council of Penang Island to head the GTWHI at the end of 2010.
“A copy of all renovation permit applications is extended to us for our comments at the technical review panel. We look for compliance to building guidelines or the strategy or action plan prepared.”
On the apparent contradictions in Bomba’s fire prevention measures and GTWHI’s focus on ensuring compliance to heritage conservation, Lim said if there were conflicting requirements then, “maybe such commercial use is not advised”.
Intrinsic value
For her, the main challenge facing GTWHI was to educate the public especially property owners on the importance of maintaining the building’s inherent character and intrinsic value, especially when renovating.
“We hope they can work with us to enhance the building’s value. We can advise them on where to get the necessary material from suppliers or get technical advice from experts.”
According to Lim, the definition of “heritage value” covers five aspects:
• historical value
• architectural value
• townscape value
• social value
• scientific value (construction technology)
“For shophouses, the only requirement is for the owner to preserve the façade. Internally, the owner can alter or make changes like adding more floor space but subject to compliance to guidelines,” explained Lim.
Special Area Plan
With the restrictions in the proposed Special Area Plan pertaining to the type of commercial activities allowed within certain zones, she pointed out that when it came to food and beverage outlets, there was no blanket ban on western restaurants.
“We want to promote local cuisine but we can still have French or Italian restaurants but not international fast food restaurants like KFC or McDonald’s.”
Lobbying
And the last word on heritage buildings and restoration comes from Penang-born entrepreneur Christopher Ong, well-known for transforming shophouses and other antiquated buildings into boutique “rental units”.
“It is important for buyers in the heritage zone to restore their properties and not just speculate and add nothing to the Unesco World Heritage Site,” pointed out Ong.
“I am lobbying the council to impose regulations to compel (proper) restoration if the property change hands. There has to be responsibility that comes with profitability.”
•Log on to www.starproperty.my for related articles and to check the rental rates and asking prices of Penang property especially in George Town.

首长:失败可能性虽高 仍盼落成槟海底隧道


(北海5日讯)槟首长林冠英指出,尽管有人劝说槟州建海底隧道的失败可能性高,但他认为至少尝试实行,希望这个东南亚第一个海底隧道能落成,相信后代也会感谢选民的勇敢改变。
他周六在北海麦曼珍灵应殿庆祝关圣帝君圣诞千秋晚宴上说,槟州政府倡导宗教信仰自由,乃首个州政府物色非伊斯兰宗教地,给其他宗教发扬各自宗教;而州政府希望物色到的非伊斯兰宗教地集中,包括2依格保留给华裔宗教、1.5依格给兴都教及一依格供天主教。
翁诗杰特别助理翁协文指出,若能把关圣帝君的“义”融入政党,相信大马政治方向会更好。
他说,本身自小受关圣帝君教义熏陶,其爷爷自中国把关圣帝君的香火带至武拉必,父亲和兄长也曾当关圣帝君庙的理事。- 光华