Monday, March 19, 2012

山坡建高楼恐肇土崩 居民举横幅“向发展商说不”

 (槟岛西南区18日讯)近百名来自新港德沙乐雨林园A、雨林园B、Regency Height及阳光花园(Sunrise Garden)的公寓居民于周日联合召开记者会,高举“我们向发展商说不”的抗议横幅,同时炮轰州政府罔顾人民安全,贸然批准发展商在斜度山坡开发屋业计划,要居民承受可能发生土崩的风险。
据居民所指,两项即将落实的屋业计划,首个计划是位于雨林园A及阳光花园公寓后的山坡,据知有关发展蓝图已被槟岛市政局批准。第2个计划则是位于樟角肯纳里(Changkat Kenari)第3条路后的山坡,居民不满原本说好要兴建半独立住宅,现在却变成兴建高楼公寓,居民担忧会发生土崩。
威胁山坡下居民安危 3大原因反对发展山坡
阳光花 园公寓居民协会主席尼古拉斯指出,刚在上个月,槟岛市政局批准兴建472个公寓单位及92间豪宅的发展蓝图,威胁着处于山坡下方的阳光花园公寓160户居民及雨林园A住着24户居民的安危。
他声称,居民反对声浪从去年开始泛起,反对主要针对3大原因,有关山坡已被列为保护地、斜度超过25度及水平线处于250度以上。
他表示,虽然居民曾会见槟州城乡策划,房屋及艺术行政议员黄汉伟及峇都茅州议员阿都玛力,可惜他们都没有得正面回应及帮助。
他声称,在308之前,前朝政府曾驳回2个州内主要发展商申请发展,可是民联执政后,州政府却批准工程并交予外州发展商。
雨林园A:市局仅发函予3户
雨林园A居民协会委员陈秀喜疑惑地表示,上个月27日,仅有3名居民接获市政局来信,指示他们可在1月内作出反映,他们希望可以在限期内收集民意,向市政局表达他们的意愿。
雨林园B:州政府罔顾人命
雨林园B居民协会主席江招明谴责州政府罔顾人民的性命安全,为了自身利益,典当人民的安危。
他指出,这项屋业计划工程会影响住在山坡下724户居民,包括Regency Height的504户居民及樟角肯纳里第1条路至第3条路排屋的220户居民。
吴家丽:29日出席聆听会
财政吴家丽指出,他们自2008年迁入该地,当时居民获知旁边有块山坡是要兴建半独立住宅。可是在上个月22日,居民接获市政局来信,通知有关地段将改为兴建高楼公寓,居民已致函反对,并会在本月29日出席聆听会。
她说,有关发展计划是1栋22层楼高、142个单位的公寓,居民担心这个处于水平线238尺、斜度29度的山坡,在兴建公寓后会发生土崩,陆续爆发的是环境污染及泊车位不足的问题等。- 光华

Sunday, March 18, 2012

The many extras on offer can be irresistible for the home buyer


IF you are looking to buy a new house or apartment, there has never been a better time than now to seriously consider it.
With home builders becoming more competitive in their quest to win new buyers and investors, and with higher demands from purchasers, there is now a wide range of extras to entice the potential buyer.
This is especially so in the higher end of the market, where purchasers are generally more discerning and more demanding. They are prepared to pay top dollar for a new home, and they expect to get the best product.
As a result, built-ins such as kitchen cabinets and wardrobes are becoming standard fare in newly built homes. In many areas, so are some basic appliances such as refrigerators, ceiling fans and air-conditioners.
In the higher end of the market, the design and concept are also important. Homes are sold on emotion as much as style and utility. The home must not just be a place one wants to come home to it must also be able to impress the guests.
While these extras go a long way in helping a potential buyer make his choice, equally important is how he is going to pay for it. Developers, working together with financial institutions, now offer various benefits in the financing packages that not only make it easier for the buyer to make his initial payments, but also save him some money in the longer term.
How do these new schemes work?
When a developer has a new project to launch, the many domestic banks as well as foreign banks that have operations in Malaysia are invited to offer financing packages to potential buyers.
Given that banks have to work within very strict guidelines set by our monetary authorities, the packages they offer are mainly confined to attractive interest rates for loans.
In today's market, most banks offer home loans at interest rates of BLR (base lending rate) minus 2.45% to 2.5%. With the BLR at 6.6% today, buyers pay a 4.1% to 4.15% interest on their loans.
This offer comes with a caveat a lock-in period of three to five years, during which a penalty will be charged if the borrower decides to refinance his purchase with another bank. The penalty is usually about 3% of the loan amount.
Apart from absorbing the legal fees and stamp duty on the loan agreement, there is not very much more that banks are allowed to offer. Banks used to absorb the penalty imposed on borrowers who move their loans from other banks, as well as the fees for discharge and new loan agreement but even these are also not permitted now.
Where the banker's hands are tied, the developer has now come in with offers that help to ease the financial burden on buyers further.
The absorption of legal fees on the sale and purchase agreement as well as the stamp duty and other miscellaneous charges are now standard fare offered by developers.
Some developers have taken it a step further by offering an interest-absorption scheme to those who buy into a newly launched property. This works in the sell-then-build concept, which is the practice in Malaysia.
When someone buys a new property, he usually is able to get a loan of up to 90% of the purchase price. For instance, if the property costs RM1mil, he will have to pay a 10% down-payment, or RM100,000, upon signing the sale and purchase agreement.
The remaining RM900,000 is disbursed by the bank to the developer at various stages of the construction from the completion of the foundation, the structure, walls and so on in lump sums of 10% or more.
Interest is only charged by the bank on the amount that has been disbursed, and while the project is still under construction, the developer pays the interest to the bank. For landed property, the construction period usually takes 24 months while high-rise projects take up to 36 months.
The buyer only starts paying when the project is completed and vacant possession of the property is handed over to him by the developer. The total sum in interest borne by the developer can thus be quite substantial.
But for those who are unable to make that first 10% down-payment, there is yet another solution. Developers now accept credit cards for the down-payment, so long as the credit limit is sufficient to cover the amount.
The buyer then repays the amount in instalments over one or two years under an “interest-free instalment plan”, much like what is on offer now for purchases at various consumer goods outlets.
The interest incurred on the sum borrowed on credit card is absorbed by the developer.
Offers such as the interest absorption scheme and the credit card plan are geared towards helping the potential buyer take the big step towards owning a property.
As competition toughens, developers are bound to come up with even more offers and extras to attract buyers. However, these offers eat into profits. Rising costs of land and materials also put pressure on margins.
Like any enterprise, there is a limit to how much extras or discounts the developer can offer. It cannot reach a point where it is no longer economically viable to proceed with a project.
Meanwhile, it is still a shopping haven for property buyers. So why wait? - The Star
● Teh Lip Kim is the MD of SDB Properties Sdn Bhd, a lifestyle property company. Bouquets and brickbats are welcomed. Send by email tomd@sdb.com.my

Looking at relevance in development


THE art of placemaking will determine whether a place or project resonates with its target audience, and contributes to higher value and quality of the overall living environment.
According to Wikipedia, placemaking capitalises on a local community's assets, inspiration, and potential, ultimately creating good public spaces that promote people's health, happiness, and well being. “Placemaking is both a process and a philosophy,” it points out.
In this profit-driven and consumerist age, placemaking may have been commercialised to bolster the cash register and companies' bottomline, but in its original simplistic form, it actually encapsulates both the tangible and intangible elements that give meaning to a place.
Things like the sights and sounds of a place, general ambience, colours, smell, building forms and architecture, and even the energy and aura of a place all come to mind. In a nutshell, they constitute things that are held dear by the community and make life meaningful to the people.
I'm sure most of us have come across places that we took a liking to the very first time we set eyes or foot on them; and there are those that did just the opposite to our senses.
Not just a market: The TTDI market in Jalan Wan Kadir. While deliberating on the redevelopment plan for the market, let’s not forget that a traditional wet market still has a role to play in our communities.
Besides the building structures and facilities, I believe it must have something to do with a place's aura and energy that determine whether it continues to be relevant to the community.
With that in mind it is important to ensure that, in the pursuit of development, the “heart and soul” and elements that give meaning to our housing estates, townships and cities are cherished and safeguarded.
Some of these places include historical buildings, cultural and arts centres, and not to forget, our alma mater the schools and universities.
Places like open fields, parks and markets are also where communities come together and they need to be perpetuated for our local communities to thrive.
These are places where we can see Malaysians of all races converge and engage with one another in true blue Malaysian spirit and appreciate each other.
Without these public spaces, the decadence in the communal spirit, which is already setting in, is bound to worsen.
Although fields, parks and markets do not generate income to the local councils, they are important community-building assets and public spaces, and should not be roped in for development purposes.
News reports that some quarters are eyeing the site of the 25-year-old Taman Tun Dr Ismail (TTDI) wet market complex for redevelopment into a mixed-used development have understandably upset many people, especially the local community who get their daily fresh produce from there, and the traders who depend on the market for a living.
The interested parties are said to have submitted their plan to the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL), which owns the market complex, and the plan is said to be under consideration.
While deliberating on whether to allow the redevelopment plan to go ahead, and what kind of concept it should be, let's not forget that a traditional wet market still has a role to play in our communities.
Besides being the place for folks from TTDI and the surrounding housing estates to buy fresh produce of fish, poultry, meat, vegetables and fruits, it is also a much appreciated community meeting place.
Although the hypermarkets and supermarkets with their frozen food section is an alternative source, home makers and those who opt to do their marketing daily at the wet market should have that option availed to them.
As for the traders that number more than 200, many of them were moved from the former Kuala Lumpur Central Market in Jalan Hang Kasturi some 25 years ago when the old market was closed for a major renovation.
A good number of them are second generation traders, having taken over the business from their elderly parents or siblings. Today the refurbished Central Market is a cultural, arts and craft centre.
Having dutifully moved from their old trading place in Kuala Lumpur to TTDI, the traders' wishes are to ensure any redevelopment plan of the market complex will preserve the concept of a traditional wet market, instead of taking after a modern hypermarket concept that will inadvertently take away the rice bowl of these traders.
If the decision is to proceed with the redevelopment plan, the authorities should look into a spanking new market with better equipped facilities, such as multi-storey car parks and a more hygienic and clean environment.
Longer operating hours will be a definite improvement to cater to office workers who can only do their marketing in the evenings.
Whatever the plan may be, there should be more transparency and engagement with the local community, traders and other stakeholders, to ensure a holistic and equitable solution for all. - The Star
● Deputy news editor Angie Ng reminisces about the good old days when the community spirit was strong and unchaperoned children walked around freely unharmed.

Friday, March 16, 2012

首长主持威北威中大蓝图推展礼 “威北人需海底隧道”


(大山脚15日讯)威省市政局今日公开2020年威北及威中发展大蓝图,从即日起至4月12日,在柏达镇威省市局举办展览会让公众一窥发展内容,而公众也可向当局提供任何意见。
槟州首长林冠英今日为威北、威中地方发展大蓝图公开展示推展礼时表示,1976年城市及乡区规划法令赋予民众权利,检阅及为该发展大蓝图提供意见。
林冠英表示,槟州政府需要准备4项地方发展计划,其中包括槟岛,以及威省三区发展计划,而现阶段(收集民众意见)则是必经的阶段。
他披露,威中的发展计划自2006年2月1日开始策划,而威北的则于2005年4月1日开始,共耗资64万8093令吉。
“州政府尤其希望通过收集民众及非政府组织的意见,以拟定对威中及威北最佳的发展大蓝图。”
他表示,所有的发展计划,都需符合槟州政府的4项原则,及绿意、健康、安全、以及清洁的槟州。
麦姆娜:欢迎提意见
威省市政局麦姆娜欢迎来自威省的公众,前来检阅并为发展大蓝图提供意见。
麦姆娜表示,展览从即日起至下月12日,然而意见收集则是从即日起至下月19日。“任何反映的意见,都可以以个人、团体、或是社委会、组织等名义,以公函形式或是备忘录形式呈交予威省市政局。”
她披露,除柏达镇市局外,公众也可到威北及威中土地局,以及光大57楼的槟州城乡规划局查阅。
“根据1976年城市及乡区规划法令,公众有权要求有关当局展延多一个月,但倘若到时没有人要求,威省市政局就不会延长。”
她在记者会上表示,槟州城乡规划局将会委任一批委员,来评估公众的意见。
询及若公众反对某项计划,当局会否因此而取消,就此,麦姆娜仅表示委员会将会各种意见作出评估及考虑。
反对声来自马华
林冠英在致词时,手持英文报纸报道,为海底隧道说项。该报章于今日专题报道,峇都加湾地区一代的居民对于第二大桥即将建竣满心期待。
他表示,威中以及威南分别拥有第一及第二大桥来往槟威两地,因此威北的人民也需要海底隧道。
林冠英坚称,自己曾经亲自询问威北的民众对于海底隧道的意见,当时一个反对的声音也没有。“反对的只是马华,任何好政策他们都会反对。”
他还说,虽然威北是国阵的强区,但是槟州政府不会因此而忽略威北的发展。
建议中的威北发展计划
1. 北海屋业发展在珍菲市、麦曼珍、拉惹勿达、峇眼拉浪、峇眼亚占及峇眼达南。
2. 新建工业区在西南路,提升麦曼珍及双溪罗甘的工业区。
3. 扩大高巴末那戎(Kubang Menerong)的农业基地。
4. 开发新路,从双溪赖至Nyior Sebatang、柏淡路至巴东色海、日落斗哇至吉打港口、柏淡路至打昔牛汝莪。提升道路设施,包括西南路、峇眼亚占路至独立桥、高巴末那戎路至打昔牛汝莪路、打昔牛汝莪路至阿拉古拉。
5. 轻地下铁(LMT)从北海-峇眼亚占-甲抛峇底及从北海-双溪赖-打昔牛汝莪。
6. 长6.5公里的海底隧道,从峇眼亚占至槟岛新关子角。
7. 在打昔牛汝莪及阿拉古拉开发饲养观赏鱼场,在日落斗哇开发饲养贝类。同时提升原有的农业区。
8. 推展历史旅游地区,包括北海火车站、码头、柏玛当柏奴安铁匠业、甲抛峇底出产的马来拖鞋、瓜拉姆拉渔产业、威北Guar Kepar及Kota Aur的考古学。
建议中的威中发展计划
1. 重新规划乡区的屋业发展,包括诗布朗再也、峇东埔、峇冬丁宜及大山脚。
2. 在埔再也花园、高巴三万及柔府再也建立新概念的巴刹。
3. 工业发展在甘榜峇眼色海。
4. 本南地、阿尔玛及武吉敏惹设立轻工业区。
5. 在武吉敏惹工业区设立研究及发展中心。
6. 在柔府设立农业基地。
7. 开发新路及提升道路设施,从高巴三万至大山脚。
8. 发展柏达镇市区、北赖植物园、大山脚体育中心、安邦惹惹市中心及武吉柔府旅游胜地。
9. 特别区域计划在凤凰花园、大山脚本南地、阿尔玛督坤、柏玛当拉哇及武吉丁雅。-

Thursday, March 15, 2012

园主拟售地 居民陆续搬 浮罗勿洞恐人口流失


槟岛西南区15日讯)由于近年来园地有价,又愁没接班人,浮罗勿洞很多园主有意脱售园地,造成许多居住在私人园地的居民未雨绸缪,先在邻区物色房子,一旦陆续搬走后,恐使该村人口流失加剧!
换言之,这也无可避免地加剧该村唯一华小-浮罗勿洞华小新生来源短缺情况。近年来,因为华裔生育率减低及人口外流,该校学生人数今年只有56人。
魏荣贵:多从事捕鱼种植业
该村社区发展暨治安委员会主席魏荣贵对本报表示,该村约有近百户华人住家,但只有10余户建在政府临时地契地段上,其余大部分居民都是住在私人园地,每年定期缴付地租给园主。
“在这种情况下,只要园主卖地,供发展商发展,受影响的居民就必须搬离该处,目前已有一些居民未雨绸缪,先向政府申请邻近地区的廉价屋,只要一接获搬迁指令,他们就会随时搬离。”
据他了解,该村有一块园地即将出售,一旦完成交易手续,将导致约7至8间住家受影响。
他指出,该村缺乏发展机会,实际上这几年来,许多年轻人因为工作关系,迁离浮罗勿洞或是离乡背井到外地工作,使到该村人口相对减少,留下来的大多数是从事捕鱼业或种植业。
“因村内有捕鱼业,吸引外人到本村购买新鲜鱼虾,使到渔业还有一线生机。至于种植业,华裔以种植榴梿居多,接下来是香蕉以及小部分橡胶、蔬菜及油棕种植,巫裔则有种香料、香蕉和芒果。”
为了留住村内人口,他盼望政府能在该村建廉价屋。
也是浮罗勿洞华小家教协会主席的他说,一些学生家长选择名校的心态也造成小部分学生流失。
邹俊扬:华小仅56学生
浮罗勿洞华小董事长邹俊扬表示,该村大约有7个小园主,有意要卖地约3至4人,这主要是因为大多数小园主年纪已大或是他们的后代并不重视这份工作,加上地价诱人,所以打算随时卖地供发展,结束这一辈的劳作。
他指出,该村缺乏廉价屋,若要从事捕鱼业的村民迁往邻村如文丁,将使他们的生计成问题。
他说,目前浮罗勿洞华小只有56个学生,若居住在私人地的居民也陆续搬走,学生人数来源肯定受影响。因此他吁请州政府多关注这问题,在该村建设廉价屋,并优先分配给村民,以确保学生来源不受影响。
他继说,村民在外购屋的情况于去年开始明显化。据他所知,迄今已有5户家庭获得分配位于浮罗文丁的廉价屋。
阿都哈林吁居民申请廉价屋
槟州议长拿督阿都哈林受询时直言不讳,目前很多浮罗小园主的第2代或第3代因考虑到地皮有价,而纷纷将园丘脱手。为此他鼓励没有房子或是居住在私人园地的居民尽速向政府申请廉价屋或中廉价屋,以免在新园主下令搬迁时,才来愁房屋问题。
他表示,浮罗山背大约有6项兴建中或已批准的新廉价屋及中廉价屋计划,分布在每个州选区,计有文丁、甘榜特浪(浮罗勿洞选区),新路头港口、柏玛当巴锡(直落巴巷选区)及属于峇六拜选区的公巴及峇六拜。
“据估计,上述房屋计划一旦全面竣工,将提供大约1000间廉价屋及中廉价屋单位,廉价屋售价4万2000令吉,中廉价屋7万2000令吉。”
他指出,凡有意申请廉价屋或中廉价屋者可前往县署、其服务中心、向民联协调员及光大房屋部进行登记,而在2008年前申请者需要在本月31日前向有关当局更新个人资料,这样才有资格获得献议房屋。
对于较有经济能力的居民,他说,他们可以考虑购买高档房屋,毕竟在浮罗一带也有很多高档房屋计划。- 光华

Saturday, March 10, 2012

Gurney Paragon - Big House, Low Budget

Near Gurney Plaza
Built-up: 4610sq ft
Move in condition
Best sea & tanjung tokong view
High floor
Price: negotiable
Full condo facilities


Click here to contact us, Penang I Property for more information or viewing

Gambier Height - Pool View

Conveniently located at Bukit Gambier, near USM
Built-up: 900 sf
Freehold
Near all amenities
Pool view

High Floor
Semi Furnished
Condo facilities
Price: RM270,000


Click here to contact us, Penang I Property for more information or viewing

Bankers and lawyers should know better


BUYING a property that eventually becomes abandoned is a painful experience for many house buyers. It not only hurts purchasers who have lost their hard-earned money but also affects the property industry's reputation which has taken a beating due to unethical activities of a few culprits.
This is particularly so when the abandoned project is not caused by factors such as economic downturn or withdrawal of purchasers, but solely due to irresponsible people who claim to be “developers” but do not hold a licence to do so.
It was recently reported that our Housing and Local Government Ministry has identified 195 abandoned developments that were unlicensed in our country. I am puzzled as to how these “developers” are able to start their projects when they do not even have their licence to apply for financing if they require a bridging loan, and is their sales and purchase (S&P) agreement properly attested by a lawyer before they start selling?
In this context, what can be done and who should play a part in reducing these unlawful developers? Assessing our existing housing development process would provide us with some ideas.
When a developer plans for a housing project, he must first get the necessary approvals and licences from the relevant authorities such as the development order, building plan, advertising permit and developer's licence. The developer then may need to source for a bridging loan from a financial institution and this is followed by getting lawyers to prepare the legal documents which include the S&P agreement.
When the project is launched to the market, the developer will require the purchasers to sign the S&P agreements in order to finalise the purchase. Should the purchaser acquire a housing loan from a bank, the bank will come into the picture to process the loan application submitted by the purchaser. Those are the basic procedures involved in developing and marketing a housing project in Malaysia.
For unlicensed development, the regulatory bodies are not in the picture. In such cases, it becomes apparent that the lawyers and/or bankers, both representing the house purchaser, have a role to play as the first line of defence to protect the interest of the purchaser.
Hence, there are questions that begged to be answered. How is it possible for financial institutions to approve the end financing loan for a property development in the absence of all or part of the required approvals and licences? The same questions are posted to lawyers who prepare the legal documents for unlicensed development.
I believe everyone has a role in identifying irresponsible players in the industry, especially the bankers and lawyers with their better access to information and strong regulatory network as compared to the general public. As a purchaser and a customer, you would have expected your banker and lawyer to carry out their due diligence duties to ensure that your interest is not compromised.
In other industries, professional practitioners who do not convey the right message and do not protect customers' interests can be given stern punishment as their action may be deemed as negligence, fraud or even criminal breach of trust.
According to the record of National House Buyers Association, in the case of Keng Soon Finance Bhd (1996), a financial institution had granted a loan to an unlicensed developer, and it was decided that the loan and the security offered were invalid. The bank could not institute the foreclosure proceedings on the land and therefore could not recover its loan.
Under our Housing Development Act, a property developer that engages in, carries out or undertakes housing development without having been duly licensed can be fined between RM250,000 and RM500,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or both. This is an avenue to take action against unlicensed developers. While we have the law in place, it is equally important to ensure strong enforcement comes along.
For house buyers, you are strongly advised to purchase property from reputable developers and to do thorough “shopping” and analysis before signing on the dotted lines. Responsible developers are keen to work hand-in-hand with purchasers and appreciate the role of the National House Buyers Association which advocates the protection of house buyers in Malaysia. We should stand together as a team to fight against irresponsible developers.
And for anyone of you who think that you have bought into one of those unlicensed developments mentioned earlier in the article, it is time to write and call your banker or lawyer for clarification.
Datuk Alan Tong is the group chairman of Bukit Kiara Properties, he was the FIABCI World president in 2005-2006 and was named Property Man of The Year 2010 by FIABCI Malaysia. - The Star

Rental eases in London market


FOR those who have bought into the London property market and are expecting some yield from their investments, a residental lettings agency urges Malaysian investors to be “realistic about rentals” as the market has shown signs of easing in some locations since the second half of last year.
Benham and Reeves managing director Anita Mehra says “some tenants are willing to downsize or move further away as they cannot afford to pay high rentals.”
Mehra: ‘Some tenants are willing to downsize.’
Mehra was in Kuala Lumpur recently to speak with Malaysians who bought into that market.
She says that although the rental market is healthy, unemployment which is expected rise and a slowing down of the UK economy will affect the rental market going forward.
Her comments are supported by research reports by property consultancies Savills and Jones Lang La Salle, both of which are based in London.
According to Savills, “the previously strong residential rental growth has recently eased in the prime rental market of central London. Prime markets of the south-east have also soften slightly.”
Jones Lang La Salle reports that “rental values have been increasing for two years now (but) the rate of growth has slowed during the second half of last year.”
In its January 2012 report Residential Market Analysis: Prime Central London, Jones Lang says “demand continues to be the highest at the lower end of the market and even more so recently since the increase in rental values has forced some tenants to seek smaller properties or less well-located areas.”
The report goes on to say that “rental value growth has been strongest in studio and one-bedroom apartments. These smaller flats have seen average rental growth of 17.1% during 2011, whereas larger flats have seen a 9.3% rise.”
Although the report focused on Prime Central London, and not the Greater London rental market, it does somewhat give an indication of the Greater London area.
While prices continue to rise in London, prices are on the downtrend in other parts of the country.
Mehra singled out success stories like the riverside development Imperial Wharf in Chelsea where a one-bedroom unit can be rented out for £400 per week compared to Beauford Park in Hendon (£250 a week for a one-bedder).
At the presentation, many investors also enquired about a project in Acton and properties in Ealing.
“Some areas may be further away from the city but the environment is good, like Ealing where it is more family-oriented,” she said.
Reports from Savills said Asian buyers tend to like east of the city in areas like Canary Wharf, at one time known as Docklands which has undergone massive regeneration.
In prime central London, Savills says the Greeks, Italians and Egyptians like Marylebone and Regents Park and tend to go for the large trophy houses and turnkey flats, while other buyers from Europe have taken a liking to Mayfair, Knightsbridge and Chelsea, Kensington and St John's Wood. The Americans go for the well-maintained family houses in West Brompton.
Dynamics changing
The London property market, as a result of the 2007/2008 global financial crisis, is undergoing changes, Mehra says.
One of the most obvious is the foreign capital flight into the market, despite the economic uncertainties in the eurozone.
They call this a “flight to safe haven”, that is foreigners are putting their money into property which they consider as a “preserver of wealth.”
Over in the United States, the reverse is happening. Across the Atlantic, prices of property have gone below the value of their mortgage loans, that is the value of the loans taken out on properties is greater than the market value of the properties.
It is baffling that while the eurozone debt problem languishes, London properties are increasing in value.
Savills' Prime London Residential Markets (January 2012) says global unrest and economic uncertainty is to London's advantage as this has resulted in equity flowing there from other parts of Europe, the Middle East and China.
The prime residential markets of London performed the most strongly over the course of last year as it benefited from strong demand from international buyers who accounted for 55% of sales. These investors introduced £4.5bil of new equity into the market in 2011, one of the highest in recent years. In 2010, foreigners invested £3.7bil into the prime residential market.
Despite the eurozone problems, the European share of the market rose from 13.2% of sales in 2010 to 19.6%, while that of Middle Eastern buyers increased from 7.6% to 8.5%.
However, in the ultra prime market where values typically exceed £15mil, and overseas demand is strongest, annual growth ended the year just short of 19%. Growth was modest in the second half of last year at just 3.75%, the Savills report says.
Buyers who go for this ultra prime real estate are also rather telling they include billionaires from Greece, Italy and Egypt. Both Greece and Italy are among the two worst-hit economies in Europe while the Middle East unrest has also resulted in capital flight to London.
The dynamics of the London property market is undergoing other changes.
Of the £4.5bil that entered the prime central London last year, about a quarter or £1.4bil of new equity (investments) flowed into the newly built prime market alone as opposed to the secondary market. Last year, most of these newly-built properties were sold to Mainland Chinese and other Asians who accounted for a quarter (26%) of foreign purchases in this sector, while UK buyers formed a little over a third. In 2009, UK buyers formed three-quarters of the market for newly build London properties, Savills' The World in London says.
Buyers from Mainland China, Singapore, Hong Kong and Malaysia tend to be more investment oriented. Their objective is to benefit from the weak sterling and possible long term growth. They dominate the apartment market but at the lower price points compared with most other overseas buyers. Good access and communication links were their key requirements.
The report further says that “developers have consequently sought to target the Chinese and Pacific Asians by tailoring products to their preferences in terms of configuration, layout and design features.”
Says Malaysia Properties Inc (MPI) chief executive officer Kumar Tharmalingam: “Those who buy into the London market are taking a risk that the sterling will strengthen and the prices will go up. They are also taking a risk that the Malaysian economy will weaken.
“While London is an international market like Singapore, being an absentee landlord, you will have to pass the management of the property to an agent and there will be a cost to that. The only thing they can hope for is capital and currency appreciation. The laws there protect the displaced, and are anti-wealthy while the laws in Singapore protect the owners and Singapore is just two hours away.”
MPI is a government agency set up to promote Malaysian properties. - The Star

Residential prices hardly fall


THERE was a lot of talk late last year that property prices will tumble in 2012 after the steep rise in the residential sector over the past few years. So far, we have not seen any of that.
What we are seeing is:
● Bank Negara's tightened guidelines on consumer lending have started to work. Loan applications and loan approvals have fallen in January;
● In certain locations, house prices and rental have started to ease; and
● Developers are offering very enticing terms since the beginning of this year.
Keep your finger on these three factors and let us now take a look at today's launches. In some of these launches, buyers need only to pay about 1% downpayment of the property price instead of the required 10% on signing of the sale and purchase agreement. The stamp duty and legal fees are also waived and they need not pay anything else until after the property is completed. Such schemes have attracted many buyers.
The question to ask is: If the market is as good as many claimed it to be, why are developers offering such schemes? When a property is sold, it is registered as a sale. But the absolute revenue of the unit is yet to be paid.
For easy calculation purposes, 10% of a RM500,000 property is RM50,000. If the first 10% is paid, this RM50,000 is registered as revenue by the developer, but in the sales column, a sale of RM500,000 is recorded. That is why the sales and revenue figures vary considerably.
If a developer allows a buyer to pay only 1% of the purchase price, this does not mean he “loses” that other 9%. He will get it back after a certain period of time. The same goes for the waiver of the stamp duty and legal fees. The developer has to pay the lawyers for services rendered. All these charges and fees are packaged into the deal which the buyer will have to bear in due time. In this case, later rather than sooner.
Developers are offering such attractive terms in order to make a sale. Many of these schemes are offered in condominium projects because there is generally a glut in this segment. While such schemes may attract genuine buyers who need a roof over their heads and who are thankful that they can defer payment, it also attracts those who have no problem forking out that 1% downpayment and take a gamble that they will be able to offload it when the project is completed.
If one were to drive around certain parts of the Klang Valley today, there are some completed high-rise with large mobile numbers plastered on windows. It may not be so easy to offload units when there are so many of them.
What is noticeably absent, and which many would like to see are more launches of landed housing. But this is unlikely to happen. Only the secondary market is offering landed units, which may explain to a certain degree why the secondary market was rather robust last year. It applies not only for the Klang Valley, but for Penang as well and is a reflection of strong domestic demand despite the many negative predictions for this year.
When a developer considers a piece of land, he thinks of how much he can make from it. If he were to build a condominium and throw in various facilities, he can sell more houses than if he were to build landed units. That is why most of the launches today are high-rise projects, be it condominiums or serviced apartments.
Developers are also limited by what they have. Increasinlgy, land in city centres and popular areas are getting smaller. Which explains why in highly dense areas, condominium projects continue to be sprout up in the most congested of areas.
The development of landed units can only take place when there is large tracts of land, which also explains why the big boys like Mah Sing andSP Setia are venturing further away from city centres.
The other obvious factor in today's launches are the size and price of the condominium units. Most of the units are small. Studio apartments may be in the 500 sq ft range or thereabouts while those targeted at families may be three-bedroom units with built-up areas of 1,200 sq ft onwards. Most of the launches today are priced close to RM700,000 onwards. On a per sq ft basis, the price is still going up, whether it is a Petaling Jaya address or a Bukit Jalil one.
So, while sales volumes may stagnate in newly-launched projects (which explains why developers are offering units for sale with a 1% downpayment), on a per sq ft basis, prices does not seem to be stabilising. Developers are trying to maintain affordability by having smaller units, deferring payment and leveraging on low interest rates. - The Star
Assistant news editor Thean Lee Cheng is glad that Bank Negara is monitoring the household debt and lending in the property sector closely as this year promises to be an exciting one.