Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Mah Sing upbeat on Penang projects


GEORGE TOWN: Mah Sing Group Bhd's projects in Penang is expected to generate about RM325mil or 13% of the projected RM2.5bil sales for 2012, compared with RM70mil or 3% of the RM2.2bil sales for 2011.
The key contributors from Penang included the Southbay Plaza and Legenda@Southbay, group chief operating officer Teh Heng Chong said at Mah Sing's “Realising Dreams Property Showcase” held in conjunction with the group's 18th anniversary celebration in Penang recently.
The event showcased 11 projects that it was currently undertaking nationwide.
“The Legenda@Southbay has generated about RM40mil since January, while the Southbay Plaza has generated RM80mil since May.
Teh (right) and Mah Sing executive director Lim Kiu Hock with a model of Southbay Plaza.
“The other project that we expect to generate the remainder this year is the first phase of the Ferringhi Residence in Batu Ferringhi.
“Pending approval, we plan to launch about RM180mil worth of low-rise condominium villas in July 2012,” Teh said.
He said Mah Sing would focus on residential properties priced below RM1mil in Kuala Lumpur, Johor, and Penang. “At present, about 70% of our launches are in this price segment, which comprises mainly small serviced residences and linked homes.”
Teh said: “We are also continuing to develop gated and guarded residential properties priced above RM1mil in good location, which is about 30% of the group's launches for 2012.”
He said the Klang Valley would still make up the bulk of the group's sales target, as it had 28 projects there.
Penang was also an important market as its contribution had risen to 13% from 3% in 2011, he added. “We are looking now for an over 100-acre site in Seberang Prai for a township development.”
Teh said he was positive on the outlook for the property market in Penang as the most of the buyers of Mah Sing's properties are largely Penangites. “Our foreign customers come from Singapore, Indonesia, and Hong Kong. - The Star

HDB flat prices up again in Q2


SINGAPORE: Resale HDB flat prices have inched upwards yet again, this time by 1.3% in the second quarter of this year, according to the Housing Board’s flash estimates released on Monday.
This resurgence comes on the back of a downward trend in the two previous quarters.
The percentage increase in the fourth quarter of last year, and the first quarter of this year were 1.7% and 0.6% respectively.
A more detailed release, said the HDB, would be out on July 27.
Upward swing: The Punggol Residences HDB BTO apartment blocks under construction This resurgence in prices comes on the back of a downward trend in the two previous quarters. – The Straits Times/ Asian News Network
The agency has committed to offer 25,000 Build-To-Order flats this year, and has launched more than 15,000 flats in the first quarter alone.
There will be 5,200 more flats launched this month, and will be in areas such as Bedok, Bukit Merah, Choa Chu Kang, Clementi, Geylang and Punggol.
On the private homes front, estimates released by the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) on Monday showed that prices have risen by 0.4% in the second quarter of this year.
Non-landed private home prices increased by 0.6%, while prices for properties outside the central region went up by a more moderate 0.4%.
There was no change in the prices in the rest of the central region.
The latest price increase is a reversal of last quarter’s price decrease of 0.1% , the first quarterly price fall since Q2 of 2009.
More detailed data will be revealed on July 27 when URA releases the full second quarter real estate statistics. – The Straits Times/Asian News Network

State offers new site for relocation of Rumah Hijau folk


BUTTERWORTH: The state government has identified a piece of land for the construction of replacement flat units for squatter families staying in the Rumah Hijau longhouses in Mak Mandin.
Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the 0.83ha (2.06 acre) land, belonging to the state, was located on Jalan Mak Mandin 5, which was about 100 metres away from the Rumah Hijau longhouses.
He said the state accepted a suggestion made by the Kampung Baru Rumah Hijau Bagan Residents’ Association to pick the particular plot of land, after a discussion with its committee members last week.
At present, the piece of land is occupied by three residential units, three workshops and a transport company depot.
Lim said the state would work out something for them.
“We hope the Federal Government will quickly approve a grant for the construction of affordable housing units there.
“We have written to the National Housing Department, giving our assurance to deliver vacant possession of the piece of land,” he said after visiting the proposed site for the replacement housing units here yesterday.
Lim said 350 houses could be built on the piece of land for the over 300 families who originally stayed in the longhouses.
Association chairman Sin Seang Kwang thanked Lim for fulfilling his promise to find a piece of land for them, adding that he would do his part to convince the federal authorities to release funds to construct the housing units.
Barisan Nasional’s Bagan parliamentary constituency coordinator David Chua said he would do the needful to help the residents get the money to build the housing units.
“I will meet with officials from the Housing and Local Government Ministry to quickly draw up the necessary design and plans for the housing units.
“Perhaps, if they can add another 30 units, it would be good as it could be given to some of the residents from the low-cost flat block in Ampang Jajar, who want to return here,” he said.
Chua reminded the squatters that they had no locus standi to demand for replacement housing units.
He stressed that this was a special case which should not be used as a precedent when handling other squatter relocation cases. - The Star

1,320 units of LMC and MC flats to be built


GEORGE TOWN: Eligible folk will now be able to own a 700sq ft low medium-cost (LMC) flat in the city.
A total of 1,320 units of LMC and medium-cost (MC) flats will be built on a 2.91ha land in Jalan S.P. Chelliah under the state’s People’s Housing Project (PPR).
Komtar assemblyman Ng Wei Aik said the Penang Development Corporation (PDC) was holding several meetings with the Penang Municipal Council (MPPP), which owns the land, to discuss the development.
He said the LMC units would cost about RM72,500 per unit while the price for the MC units had yet to be finalised.
“We are in the last stages of planning and in the midst of fine-tuning the plan so that the projects will have a multi-storey car park, rooftop garden, futsal/badminton courts, a community hall, kindergarten, surau and other facilities,” he told reporters during a site inspection yesterday.
Ng said there would be two blocks of LMC and MC flats and each block would be between 20 and 25-storey high.
He added that the MPPP quarters currently located at the site would be demolished for the project.
“There are also eight Hindu temples here which will be relocated within the vicinity to make way for the project,” he said.
MPPP Planning Committee alternate chairman Felix Ooi Keat Hin said they had also identified a 2.9ha of land in Padang Tembak and another 5.26ha of land in Jalan Perak for LMC units. He said work on the project in Jalan S.P. Chelliah was scheduled to start by year-end. - The Star

Real estate in the UK


Maidenhead is one of the most affluent areas of the UK. It lies on the River Thames countryside and can be a gold mine due to its close proximity to the capital, London.
The Inter-City train from Paddington takes only 20 minutes and the other major attractions are the Windsor Castle, Henley on Thames with its famous Henley Regatta since 1839 and Eton College.
An established international real estate services provider, KPWG International acquired a 4.04 hectare of real estate land in Maidenhead in late 2008.
The Maidenhead land opportunity allows the owner or investor to have total flexibility and control over the land.
The allocated time frame is three years from date of issuance of the freehold title deed.
Besides that, KPWG is also marketing the ever-popular UK student pods in Leeds, Bolton and Liverpool via its real estate subsidiary, KPWG Real Estate.
The projects in Leeds and Bolton are refurbishments of existing buildings with ready planning permission and its completion date is targeted in September or October this year.
Interested purchasers should pay the KPWG International booth a visit during the Star Property Fair 2012 to find out more about the development.
Touted as Malaysia’s premier showcase for stylish living, the four-day extravaganza will be held at Gurney Plaza and the adjoining G Hotel from July 12 to July 15.
Organised by The Star for the 10th year, the fair will be open to the public from 10am to 10pm daily. Admission is free.
To date, 50 exhibitors, including financial institutions and investment companies, have confirmed their participation.
Among the major players are IJM Land, SP Setia Group, Mah Sing Properties, Sunway Bintang, Ivory Properties Group, DNP Land, BSG Property, Ideal Group, Bukit Kiara Properties, Andaman Property, Henry Butcher, KPWG International, Magna Putih, Province Valley and Tambun Indah Land.
This year’s new faces include Elite Forward, Sunrise Manner, Solid Tribute (Asia Green Group), GSD Land, Quantum Metro Development, Zetapark Development, East West One Consortium, PJD Eastern Land, Airmas Management, Property Talk, Avenue Properties and Popular Realty.
For contest buffs, three tablets and other attractive prizes will be won daily.
IJM Land is the official sponsor for the contest while Hong Leong Bank is the sponsor for the talks and forums. - The Star

Residential project in Batu Maung to feature green elements


THOSE looking for a green haven away from the hustle and bustle of city life should consider Sunway Cassia in Batu Maung.
Developed by Sunway Berhad, the sprawling, freehold residential project spans 9.36ha (23.13 acres) and is strategically located near the second Penang bridge and the Penang International Airport.
According to the company’s property development division general manager Tan Hun Beng, they will be opening up Phase 2 of the project for registration during the upcoming Star Property Fair 2012.
To be launched in the fourth quarter of this year, it comprises 59 units of three- storey terrace homes with gross built-up areas of 281.3sq metres (3,028sq ft) and 310sq metres (3,341sq ft), and priced at RM1mil onwards.
It is easily accessible via Jalan Permatang Damar Laut, which connects with Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu Expressway and the Penang Bridge.
The project’s main feature would be its green elements.
“There will be a generous, 0.8ha (2 acres) natural park, along with smaller pocket parks and thematic gardens throughout the development – one of them being the Spice Garden which imbues the place with wonderful aromas.
“With the scarcity of land on Penang island today, it is rare to have such a big plot of land allocated for leisure.
“In addition, units will also have green building features like rainwater harvesting and solar hot water systems,” Tan said when met at his office recently.
Among the units’ other features are modern designs aesthetics, practical layouts, wide windows to aide natural ventilation, spacious family areas, separate wet and dry kitchens, walk-in wardrobe and en-suite bathrooms.
The company will also be showcasing its Sunway Wellesley project in Bukit Mertajam on the mainland.
Spread over 24.2ha (60 acres), it is a mixed development of landed and high-rise residences with commercial shop offices.
Phase 1, to be launched this month, comprises 31 units of three-storey shop offices, priced at RM1.2mil, and it is available for booking during the fair.
According to Tan, the project fronts the main thoroughfare of Jalan Muthu Palaniappan, and is a stone’s throw away from the old, Bukit Mertajam township, with well-established retail, F&B outlets and banks all in close proximity.
The Penang Bridge, Butterworth-Kulim Expressway, Summit Hotel, Sunway Carnival Mall, AEON Jaya Jusco, Tesco Bukit Mertajam, specialist hospitals and national and private schools, are all within a 10km radius.
Tan pointed out that the shop offices would be built around a covered central atrium, giving each unit dual frontage. The atrium will also play host to all kinds of events.
“We anticipate that it’ll become the new lifestyle hub that spices up the area with a new ‘happening’ ambience. The rejuvenating effects will inject life into the old Bukit Mertajam area,” he added.
The first phase is expected for completion in 2014. The company also expects to roll out Phase 2 either at the end of this year or beginning of next year.
During the fair, they will be offering rebates of up to 10% on selected projects.
Touted as Malaysia’s premier showcase for stylish living, the four-day extravaganza will be held at Gurney Plaza and the adjoining G Hotel from July 12 to July 15.
Organised by The Star for the 10th year, the fair will be open to the public from 10am to 10pm daily. Admission is free.
To date, 50 exhibitors, including financial institutions and investment companies, have confirmed their participation.
Among the major players are IJM Land, SP Setia Group, Mah Sing Properties, Sunway Berhad, Ivory Properties Group, DNP Land, BSG Property, Ideal Group, Bukit Kiara Properties, Andaman Property, Henry Butcher, KPWG International, Magna Putih, Province Valley and Tambun Indah Land.
This year’s new faces include Elite Forward, Sunrise Manner, Solid Tribute (Asia Green Group), GSD Land, Quantum Metro Development, Zetapark Development, East West One Consortium, PJD Eastern Land, Airmas Management, Property Talk, Avenue Properties and Popular Realty.
For contest buffs, three tablets and other attractive prizes will be won daily. IJM Land is the official sponsor for the contest while Hong Leong Bank is the sponsor for the talks and forums. - The Star

Calls for quotas on affordable homes


KUALA LUMPUR (July 3): State governments should impose quotas for affordable housing on property developers, said Minister of Housing and Local Government Datuk Seri Chor Chee Heung in his keynote speech at the Third Annual Affordable Housing Projects conference on Monday.

Quoting statistics from a recent Household Income Survey by the Economic Planning Unit (EPU), Chor said 76% of Malaysians earn below RM5,000 per month. “Based on a credit line at 30% of net income for housing loan and at the current base lending rate of 6.6%, the maximum price of houses that this group can afford, below RM5,000 per month, is below RM300,000.
“As such, affordable housing in Malaysia can be defined as houses priced below RM300,000,” he said. Chor said in the past, quotas imposed by the state government on private developers were only on low-cost housing.
“Instead of purely low-cost housing quotas, state governments can apportion a certain percentage for developers and impose a quota on affordable housing, perhaps, not more than RM300,000 per house.
a
Chor says affordable housing in Malaysia can be defined as house priced below RM300,000.
“This will make property developers happy because they won’t have to subsidise so much in their imposition of quotas for low-cost housing,” he said. Property developers view the call for a quota imposition on affordable housing by state government positively as it will meet the demand of the swelling middle income group in the country.
“Property developers would rather build affordable houses compared to low-cost houses. We can make a profit by building affordable houses, but not low-cost houses. “Plus, low-cost housing doesn’t match current market demand,” said a property developer familiar with the Malaysian property scene.
Property developers pointed out that there is an oversupply of low-cost housing presently. “Even in places outside the Klang Valley, nobody is taking up these low-cost units. Some developers had to go to the state government to apply for a waiver on the low-cost status,” said a property developer.
However, property developers said it would be difficult for an affordable housing quota to be imposed in the Klang Valley as land for development consists of pocket-sized developments. “Prices of land in the city are expensive. Furthermore, there are only small parcels of land. How will the state government be able to impose quotas when the development is only two blocks of high rise condominiums?
”This quota will be suitable for developments outside the city,” said one property developer. Chor said since 2010 the federal government has stepped up initiatives in addressing the affordable housing dilemma faced by the middle income group through programmes such as 1Malaysia People’s Housing Scheme (PR1MA).
PR1MA, a public-private partnership between property developers and the federal government, aims to build 42,000 units of affordable homes within the Klang Valley, Rawang and Seremban. For the first scheme launched in July 2011, house prices ranged from RM150,000 to RM300,000. Meanwhile, for the second scheme, houses will be priced between RM200,000 and RM400,000.
Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department, Datuk Devamany S Krishnasamy, told the press that PR1MA is a way to harmonise supply and demand. “We are harmonising demand. When we do that, the prices will settle to a level that is fair to people. If property developers make a 50% margin previously, now they will only make a 30% margin,” he added.
Acknowledging that access to housing is a basic need, Chor said the affordable housing quest would require collaborative partnership between all stakeholders to shoulder the responsibility of provide affordable housing.
“Shortage of affordable housing needs to be addressed immediately. Failing which, the burgeoning middle income group will become a ‘sandwiched group’ without proper homes leading to various social economic problems,” he added.
This article appeared on The Edge Financial Daily July 3, 2012.

Saturday, June 30, 2012

Selling a haunted house


SELLING a house, even in a stable property market, can be quite a challenge. But what if the home you're trying to dispose of happens to be haunted?
It's not a common occurrence, but once in a while, you (or someone you know) may end up running into a property transaction where the house was the scene of a horrific crime and is now home to some ghostly inhabitants.
According to an article by US-based Realtor Magazine, haunted properties fall within the category of “stigmatised properties,” or real estate that is not defective in any physical manner, but due to psychological or emotional factors, may have a reduced value.
Among the situations covered under the title of “stigmatised” is a property that was the site of a murder, suicide, alleged haunting, or “other parapsychological phenomenon,” it says.
And according to Reuters, stigmatised homes typically sell for 10% to 20% less than comparable homes.
On the local front, all of this is compounded by the fact that most Malaysians are generally quite superstitious, meaning that anything associated with the dead is considered taboo and should be avoided like a plague!
One local property realtor concurs that a haunted house is much more difficult to sell.
“It's a known fact that it will affect the marketability of the property and may even take a long time to sell it.
“If it's known in the market that someone was killed there, the price could be affected,” he says.
In a worst case scenario, if your home is haunted, it may never get sold, says VPC Alliance (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd director James Wong.
“There are many abandoned houses in Malaysia that are supposedly haunted and have been vacant for a long time because they are difficult to sell,” he tells StarBizWeek.
If you happened to own a house that has a macabre past and plan to put it on the market. What can you do to increase the marketability of this supposedly haunted dwelling?
Rumours and hearsay
A house could falsely be considered haunted due to rumours or inaccurate stories.
“Sometimes it's all just a matter of hearsay. No one may have actually experienced anything eerie, but people just keep talking about it,” says Malaysian Institute of Estate Agents president Nixon Paul.
“They may say things like don't go to that place because it's haunted,' and then the story just stops there. Nothing supernatural is really experienced and the house (is stigmatised) due to a malicious rumour.”
Henry Butcher Marketing Sdn Bhd chief operating officer Tang Chee Meng points out that people can get easily carried away by stories they read or movies they watch.
“Sometimes movies can have a psychological effect on people. But after they live in the house for a while and nothing bad is experienced, everything is fine.”
Sometimes, the imagination can play cruel tricks on the mind. If you're convinced that you have spiritual squatters living with you, get an expert to examine the place.
“It's always best to get to the bottom of things just to be sure,” says Vincent Liew, a seasoned roof repairman who also does household repairs.
“The sounds you hear could be caused by the wind and the vibrations you feel from loose fittings or a heavy vehicle passing by. If you're seeing shadows, check to see if they are caused by something external, like an overhanging tree branch or moving curtains, for example. Try recreating the sound yourself.”
If the house you own is looking a little dilapidated, giving it a ghostly appearance, all it may need is some sprucing up or a fresh coat of paint.
KL Interior Design executive designer Robert Lee says “a house looks like it is haunted” because of the lack of maintenance.
“If your house is overgrown with weeds, cut or trim the bushes. If the wall or fence is damaged, fix it. Some properties are so badly neglected, it can actually look abandoned or even haunted. This won't boost your resale value,” he says.
If, after everything you've done and you're still convinced that the property you have is haunted, then it's best to get an expert to deal with it.
“Getting help from a priest or a medium can help deal with this,” says Lee.
Disclosure
If, after everything you've done and your spooky inhabitants refuse to go away, then the next thing you need to consider is whether to disclose to the prospective buyers that the house you're selling is indeed haunted.
In certain countries, such as the United States, it is a legal obligation for the seller to disclose information about the property's history, for example the house may have been the scene of a gruesome crime such as murder.
Fortunately for sellers, no such law exists in Malaysia.
“In this case, the doctrine of caveat emptor (which is Latin for “Let the buyer beware”) applies,” says one industry expert.
“Here, the onus is on the buyer to do research about the property's history. There is no onus on the seller or agent to disclose anything,” he says.
Kuala Lumpur-based lawyer Dinesh Kanavaji concurs that there is no rule for a seller to disclose that his or her property is haunted.
“There is no legal obligation. But then, which seller would want to disclose that anyway? Of course, morally, you should disclose.
“Either way, a buyer should do the necessary research first if he's heard things about the house,” he says.
Not a bad thing
To some buyers, a haunted house may be more of an attraction than a deterrent.
“Not everyone is superstitious or cares if a house is haunted. As long as they have a roof above their heads, that's all that counts,” says one industry observer.
“In a hot property market where prices are sky-high, a haunted house, which would fetch a lower price, is more likely to attract prospective buyers in droves assuming of course they're not concerned about sharing their abode with some ghostly housemates,” he adds.
In an article last year, online business portal Business Insider reported that investors sometimes look to buy a haunted house in the hope of gutting the premises, building a new abode and reselling it for a larger profit.
“Other times, adventurous business owners purchase haunted houses in order to transform the properties into bed-and-breakfast, restaurants, or local businesses that will attract curious visitors.”
While many believe that it's detrimental to own a haunted property, whether residential or commercial, some believe that the impact would be lesser if it's the latter.
“If it's residential property, it will have a bigger impact because people are living there. That's not the case for retail premises because you're not living there, so it's not too much of a concern,” says Richard Chan, past president of the Malaysian Association for Shopping and Highrise Complex Management and national committee member of the Building Management Association of Malaysia.
“Of course it does not help if the (commercial) property is haunted, but it's not detrimental,” he says.
Chan adds that sometimes it's best to not know what you're buying into.
“What you don't know won't hurt you,” he says.
Another industry observer, meanwhile, believes one has to worry more about the living than the dead.
“It's better to live next to a cemetery than an unruly neighbour,” he says. - The Star

Where land is scarce, the sky’s the limit


IMPACTED by high-land cost in Penang, Ivory Properties Group Bhd will focus on building high-rise properties on the island.
Group chairman and chief executive officer Datuk Low Eng Hock says the price of landed properties may be beyond the affordability of most due to exorbitant land prices.
”We hardly come by a big parcel of land to plan for landed projects on the island. Most are pockets of land suitable for high rise development.
”We don't think planning for landed properties will work; the property prices will be very expensive,” Low adds.
Low showing an artist impression of the Penang World City project.
The cost of a plot of net land in a prime area like Pulau Tikus is between RM500 and RM600 per sq ft. In Tanjung Bungah and Batu Ferringhi, land is priced between RM300 to RM400 per sq ft, while in the South-West district it is between RM100 and RM200 per sq ft.
The land price today is about 20% more than a year ago.
Ivory plans to launch only high-rise schemes in the second half of this year. These include:
the first phase of the RM10bil Penang World City (PWC) project in Bayan Mutiara
the RM300mil third and fourth phases of the residential towers for Penang Times Square
The Bay, a RM130mil sea-fronting condominium block in Batu Ferringhi
and the RM400mil City Mall and City Residence project in Tanjung Tokong
These are some of the key projects that will spur the growth of the group over the next five years.
Last year, Ivory acquired the 102.56 acres for the PWC project for RM1.072bil and 2.4 acres for The City Mall and City Residence in Tanjung Tokong for RM40mil.
The 1.1 acres for the The Bay project in Batu Ferringhi was acquired for RM25mil in 2010.
Despite the high land cost, Ivory plans to keep a percentage of the properties affordable.
The first phase of the PWC project on a 10-acre site, with an RM800mil gross development value, comprises approximately 1,500 condominium units, of which about 15% will be affordably priced between RM300,000 and RM500,000 for units with built-up areas of 600 sq ft and 800 sq ft.
“Subsequent phases for PWC will also see 15% of the properties priced in the affordable range of between RM300,000 and RM500,000. These units were in the entire master plan as a value-added component from the very early stage, even during the tender exercise for the project,” Low adds.
Low says the group also wants to position The Bay project as a medium to high-end scheme, as investors' preference for luxurious super-condominiums has dried up.
As for the City Mall and City Residence project, the plan is to develop 80% residential units and 20% of three-storey commercial lots.
“We are looking at selling the City Mall and City Residence units each for between RM700,000 and RM750,000. The City Mall will have a gross built-up area of 600,000 sq ft. For the residential towers for Penang Times Square, there will be 700 condominium units of various sizes, ranging from 400 sq ft to 1,200 sq ft,” he says.
To differentiate Ivory from its competitors, Low says the group will use architectural and cultural themes of a particular country in the Penang World City project. .
“As we are planning for a world class city within PWC. Economies of scale is of the essence. We need a huge number of Penangites to call Penang World City their home. That is why PWC has affordable components,,” he says.
There would be Chinese, Korean, Middle Eastern and European villages in PWC, so that the properties can be marketed in that particular country through an appointed real estate agent, he says.
“We want to create a world culture in order to attract tourism and foreign investors and to differentiate PWC from the other mega-development projects on the island. These parcels will be solely for en-bloc sales to expatriates,” he says.
Last July, Ivory won the right from Penang Development Corporation to purchase and develop the PWC project in Bayan Mutiara after edging out four other parties, including SP Setia Bhd,.
Ivory offered RM240 per sq ft or RM1.072bil for the entire site, the highest, , securing with it the right to develop on the existing 67.56-acre site and another 35 acres that will be reclaimed over the next three years.
Tropicana Ivory Sdn Bhd, a joint-venture company in which Dijaya Corporation Bhd holds a 55% stake, and Ivory Properties Group Bhd the remaining 45%, is the developer of the PWC project.
On the City Mall and City Residence, he says the residential components will sit above the retail outlets. It will have an open tropical style interior design featuring giant palm trees, water features with lots of natural lighting, to blend with the architectural design of the residential component,” he adds. - The Star

Housing fund poser


Is the 3% deposit imposed enough to revive abandoned projects?
Recently, it was reported that an amendment to the housing Development Act 2012 will require developers to set aside 3% of the gross development cost to be placed in a fund that will be managed by the Housing and Local Government Ministry. The proceeds from the fund will be used to revive abandoned projects.
The Housing Developers Authority (HDA) will only issue licensed permit once the 3% is paid (to be enforced end of this year). It is a good move but the quantum may be insufficient to rectify the problem.
The reason being, it all depends at what stage of construction the projects were abandoned. If they wereat 20% completion, then 3% allocation may be insufficient, unless we assume the balance 80% can be sourced from the fund.
It remains unclear how the fund works. A check with the Housing Ministry indicates that the 3% allocation can be refunded to the developer concerned if the project is completed. From what I understand, the 3% allocation is then not considered as a contribution to the fund since the deposit is refundable.
Fund or not?
I fail to understand how 3% can be sufficient unless the completion-to-date reaches 97% development cost (assume also 97% physical completion) and the amount to complete requires the balance 3%. The fund looks and sounds like a fund but in reality, it is not truly a “fund”.
Assuming all the developers completed their projects and there is no abandonment, what does it mean? It means all the deposits will be refunded and there will be no money in the fund, so I don't see how the fund will help other abandoned projects.
I used to have a friend in Rehda institute who told me that it had in the past actually kick-started an “insurance” concept where all members could contribute some money into the pool. This money was to be used to help members in the event a project was abandoned.
Somehow, it did not take off.
There are many causes of abandonment but invariably the developers who cause problems are the ones that are inadequately capitalised to carry out development projects. In other words, they are not financially strong, they rely too heavily on bank financing and buyers to fund their projects.
The development risk is skewed towards the consumers, meaning they take bigger risk in the event of a failure.
Saving projects
Everybody thinks property development is very profitable and they want to jump onto the bandwagon to make a fast buck. Many do not have the necessary experience and don't bother to do market studies. The result is that they have a wrong product in a location where there is no demand.
Others get into trouble because they are too ambitious and have financially over-stretched themselves. Some of these projects were designed-driven rather than market driven.
When a project is abandoned, it leads to legal and technical problems. Reviving abandoned projects is no easy task.
In a private free market, white knights (except the Government) will only come in if they can make money upon reviving a project.
I have seen cases where liquidators act as developers. But they do not use their own money. They use the fund accumulated from the additional top up from buyers, money in the developer's account, buyers' past payments and sale of remaining units. In these cases, buyers waive their late delivery claims.
When the Government comes in to help, the objective is different. The motive is not profit but a sense of social responsibility. However, they only focus on low/medium cost projects.
I have also seen bridging financiers acting as temporary “developers” who use their own internal fund to complete the projects. They take calculated risk while the white knights will only proceed if the projected result shows viability.
Their injection of fund varies, depending on the stages of completion to date. Some are abandoned at 50% completion, some at 90%. There are times when internal funding is inadequate and external funding is required. There is, therefore, no pre-determined amount required to complete an abandoned project.
Coming back to the 3% allocation, smaller developers complain of high opportunity cost involved when their money is locked up in the HDA account. Bigger developers are well capitalised and have no problem with the 3% ruling.
Buyers at risk
All developers make provisions of between 3% and 5% for contingency or cost variance. The bigger developers will use the provision to meet the requirement. Smaller developers argue that it is a burden and barrier to entry into the industry.
My question is: “A property development often runs into hundreds of millions of ringgit. If they cannot pay the 3% development cost, what does that tell you?”
They want to have their cake and eat it too. The problem is, most developers want to fund their projects almost entirely by purchasers' cashflow. I can understand if they are unable to come up with 100% equity but how about 30% to 40% own capital and the rest from financiers or buyers' progressive payments?
Lastly, what is the level of enforcement by the authorities? What is the point of having all the rules and regulations if they are not enforced?
We have cases where developers do not even apply for a developer's license. Hence, they do not have to pay the RM200,000 deposit for the developer's licence and open a HDA account. Buyers' interest are therefore not protected.
What guarantee is there that they will play by the rules and pay the 3%?
People will circumvent the system if malpractices are allowed to go unpunished.
I hope the authority will take a tougher stance to safeguard buyers as well as the industry from the few rogue developers who give the industry a bad reputation. - The Star
Chris Yong is the principal of Rochester Properties.