Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Only World Group won open tender to rejuvenate Penang’s Komtar

Restoring the shine to an icon
KOMTAR — arguably Penang’s best known landmark — will be revitalised to become one of the top tourism draws in the state.
Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the state wanted to bring back the past glory of the iconic tower.
“At one time, it was the main shopping centre. We want to bring back its shine,” he said after launching the construction of a banquet hall at Level Five in Komtar.
Lim said work was in progress for the rebranding of the 65-storey tower.
“After almost 30 years of neglect, most of the shoplots and office spaces for the private sector have been taken up,’’ he said.
The banquet hall is part of Komtar’s revitalisation initiative undertaken by the Only World Group, which was entrusted with the project by the state government and the Penang Development Corporation through open tender.
Apart from the banquet hall, this project will also include the construction of two external high speed observation bubble elevators.
Levels 59 and 60 as well as 64 and 65 will be refurbished into international-class sky dining restaurants including an outdoor dining area.
Only World chairman and chief executive officer Datuk Richard Koh said the restaurant would be installed with a transparent floor to provide an impression that the patrons were dining in the sky.
Only World has pledged over RM50mil for the project and Koh was confident that it could reap returns from this venture, owing to the state’s growing clout as a tourist destination.
He also spoke highly of Penang’s tourism sector if the state could develop new must-see attractions. - The Star

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Property market is expect to self-correct in the next year

PETALING JAYA: The "bold measures" to cool the market under the Budget 2014 will help the property market self-correct within the next six month to one year, said the spokesperson for the Association of Valuers, Property Managers, Estate Agents and Property Consultants in the Private Sector (PEPS)

The higher real property gains tax (RPGT), goods and services tax (GST) which will kick in April 2015, banks to stop funding projects with developer interest-bearing schemes (DIBS) and developers to be more upfront about their freebies will likely cause a surge in property transactions and launches as developers, institutions and individuals rush to "beat the system", followed by a dearth of launches as developers cope with added cost arising from the GST.

"The market is dynamic. If supply is less than demand, developers will come in to build more. So the mechanism of demand and supply will self-correct," said James Wong, publicity chairman for PEPS.

PEPS past president Elvin Fernandez also noted that the RPGT will help mitigate the higher property prices - including residential properties due to higher material and labour cost arising from the GST.

"We have 17 months before GST kicks in and in the meantime you have the RPGT so that will arrest the rush into property to beat the artificiality inherent in the implementation of the GST.

The effective abolishment of the DIBS and transparency about marketing packages will also lead to a more balanced and realistic market, said PEPS vice president Siders Sittampalam.

"With this moves against excessive speculation, we will have more realistic pricing, backed by fundamentals rather than excessive speculation," he said.

He added that the market was distorted by all the incentives by the developers, who had initially introduced these innovative schemes to boost flagging sales in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

"Prior to this we had speculators outstripping investors and with these measures to curb excessive speculation we will have a market that is a little more realistic, dominated by investors and owner-occupiers.

"With the abolishment of the DIBS... the secondary market will start leading the way in terms of pricing," he said.

Meanwhile,  PEPS president Lim Lian Hong noted that the revised RPGT is more effective in reducing excessive speculation because it covered the usual construction period of 36 months.

"Buyers should at least see the construction of their property to completon, because if there is a lot of selling and reseling, it would interrupt construction, cause a lot of upheavals, so the project will not go on smoothly. The exemption after five years is also good because it protects long-term investors," he said.

According to Lim, in the past two yeard hotspots such as Kuala Lumpur, Penang and Johor have seen prices rise by 20% to 30% per year.

The new RPGT rate imposes a 30% tax on the first three years of holding,  followed by 20% on the fourth year and 15% on the fifth year. Sales from the sixth year onwards are exempt.

Meanwhile, foreign investors and companies will be charged a 30% tax for the first five years and 5% on sales in subsequent years. - The Edge Property

E&O said to be in final stages of approval for reclamation works for STP2 in Penang

PETALING JAYA: Eastern & Oriental Bhd (E&O) is increasingly getting on the radar of analysts’ positive view on its shares in light of its reclamation-based development in Penang.
E&O is reportedly in the final stages of securing regulatory approval for the commencement of reclamation works for its Sri Tanjung Pinang Phase 2 (STP2) project in Penang.
Some analysts envisage reclamation to start in the second half of 2014.
Analysts expect a significant positive impact from STP2 in terms of the projected gross development value (GDV). They reckon that it will be about three times the GDV of the first phase of the Sri Tanjung Pinang project (STP1), which stood at about RM4bil.
Under STP1, E&O has already reclaimed some 97ha for development.
On Aug 24, E&O held a public forum for its proposed master plan of STP2 at Straits Quay, Penang.
While STP2 has already received approval in-principle, this is the last hurdle before the final approval by the state government. STP2 is 78.8% owned by E&O and the balance 21.2% by the Penang government.
“The cut-off period for the submission of public feedback on the detailed environmental impact assessment (DEIA) study is set for Oct 31. Subsequently, questions raised by the public… together with the responses, will be collated and compiled into the DEIA report. The target submission to the Department of Environment (DOE) is in the middle of November,” AmResearch said.
In early October, AmResearch initiated coverage on E&O with a fair value of RM3 per share – based on a 35% discount to its net asset value (NAV) of RM4.61 after incorporating the significant accretion to its asset value from STP2. Stripping out STP2, AmResearch said the NAV of E&O would be RM1.36 per share.
AmResearch reckons that STP2 would be granted regulatory approvals from the Penang government by the first half of 2014.
HwangDBS Research property analyst Yee Mei Hui pointed out that E&O has a strong pipeline of RM2.35bil worth of projects to be launched for its financial year ending March 31, 2014.
They include the Mews@Yap Kwan Seng condos (with a GDV of RM400mil), the maiden launch of terraces at Medini in the Iskandar Development region, Andaman at STP1 (GDV of RM500mil) and the Princes House in Central London (GDV: RM300mil).
Yee has a target price of RM3.10 for E&O based on a 30% discount to its revised NAV of RM4.41.
Given the strong sales pipeline, AmResearch sees E&O’s earnings expanding by a compounded growth of 18% over the next three years, from RM141mil in financial year 2014 to RM200mil in financial year 2016.
For the first quarter to June 30, 2013, E&O’s net profit was down 11.38% to RM27.22mil while revenue was down 46.88% to RM94.99mil. The lower profit was mainly due to cost incurred for the completion of various development projects, namely in STP1, St Mary Residences and Villas by-the-sea bungalows.
Meanwhile, E&O has entered into a memorandum of agreement with Sime Darby Bhd to start negotiations on the proposed acquisition of 55ha of freehold land in Bukit Jelutong. The land, part of a 341ha plot, is also part of the larger 809ha Elmina West estate.
RHB Research views this development positively as this marks the beginning of efforts by both E&O and Sime to reap the synergistic benefits since the latter bought a 30% stake in the former in 2011.
While there are no indications of pricing and GDV, RHB Research said that checks on raw land in Bukit Jelutong showed that it could be worth RM15 to RM20 per sq ft (psf).
“Upon conversion and completion of infrastructure, its value could potentially be worth about RM30 psf. Hence, this purchase will potentially cost E&O RM180mil. Based on the land price, we estimate that the potential GDV could amount to RM1bil to RM1.3bil,” it said. - The Star

Monday, October 28, 2013

槟政府为『无壳族』捎佳音 北海3地建逾2千可负担屋

(北海27日讯)槟州政府选择在北海3个闹市地段,兴建逾2000间可负担房屋售价介于4万2000令吉至23万令吉,计划预计明年4月开始逐渐落实,威省“无壳一族”购屋有望!
这些地段包括甘榜爪哇的6依格土地,将兴建逾600间的中价公寓,售价介于23万令吉;峇眼达南则将兴建超过400间的廉价屋,售价介于4万2000令吉;位于安邦惹惹后方空置的逾10依格土地,则用来兴建中廉价屋,初定价格是7万2500令吉。
州行政议员林峰成表示,以上3个在峇眼国会选区的房屋计划,是为了让“无壳一族”受惠所兴建,廉价屋约有650方尺、中廉价屋则有700方尺,而中价公寓则有800方尺。
坐落市中心交通方便
“这些地点都是坐落在市中心的州政府地段,交通方便且附近的公共措施完善,如果以私人发展商用目前市价衡量,价格介于每方尺400令吉或以上!”
他说,计划将分阶段进行,甘榜爪哇的计划初步敲定明年7月展开招标,其余2项计划则将另行择日进行。目前,该计划正在拟定图测阶段,一旦完成将启动下一步程序,工程将由槟州发展机构全面负责。- 光华

Sunday, October 27, 2013

Higher tax rates may not stop house prices from going up

PETALING JAYA: The increase in Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT) will dampen speculation but it is unlikely to stop house prices from escalating and may even lead to a rise, say developers and consultants.
Real Estate and Housing Deve­lopers Association (Rehda) president Datuk Seri Michael K.C. Yam said the drastic increase to 15%-30% from 10%-15% previously would discourage any would-be speculator.
“Having said that, I have no strong evidence that speculation was one of the main reasons that pushed up property prices. There were some hot spots but it was definitely not on a nationwide basis,” he told The Star.
Property prices in the sub-sale market, added Yam, could increase if homeowners decided to defer selling to avoid the new tax rates.
The sub-sale market, he said, comprised 70% of residential transactions and a decrease in market supply would be inevitable if homeowners delayed selling.
“This means buyers will move to the new properties market and further increase the demand-supply imbalance there. So, a possible side effect is that it could even move prices higher,” he said.
The flat rate of 30% RPGT for six years on foreign-owned properties, said Yam, would also hurt developers during their promotions abroad.
CH Williams Talhar & Wong Sdn Bhd managing director Foo Gee Jen said the doubling of RPGT to 30% would lessen or stop speculation but that in the long-term, this would only make the market more manageable instead of stopping prices from going up.
However, he said limiting foreigners to buying properties worth RM1mil and above should only be applied to major cities like Kuala Lumpur, Johor and Penang.
Khong & Jaafar Sdn Bhd managing director Elvin Fernandez said increasing the RPGT at this stage would also arrest undue price hikes, which was usual before the implementation of Goods and Services Tax scheduled for April 2015.
Deloitte Malaysia RPGT leader Tham Lih Jiun said property price escalation was due to other factors besides speculation, including rises in construction cost and building materials as well as land scarcity.
However, Johor Rehda branch chairman Koh Moo Hing said the increase in the ceiling price for foreigners was expected to have a “negative impact” on the state’s property market, calling it “not good news” for Iskandar Malaysia. - The Star

Wide support for revised RPGT

PETALING JAYA: The increase in the Real Property Gains Tax (RPGT) to discourage speculative buying has come in for wide support, and not just among people looking to own homes.
Fomca secretary-general Datuk Paul Selvaraj said he backed the Budget 2014 proposal of almost doubling the RPGT to 30% as it was essential to curb speculation.
“We feel the Government did listen to consumers, and owning a house has now become a higher possibility,” he said.
“However, the hike in RPGT must be accompanied by an increase in affordable housing projects.”
The RPGT is imposed on the profit made on properties sold off within a set period of time, with a rate of 30% within three years followed by 20% and 15% in the fourth and fifth year respectively. No tax is imposed if a property is sold after six years.
Centre for Public Policy Studies chairman Tan Sri Ramon Navaratnam said the RPGT was a good way to dampen speculation and even prevent a possible property bubble.
On the impact it might have on ordinary people who are not speculators but wish to sell their property within five years, Ramon said: “It is not even a reasonable proposition. For most people, buying property is one of the biggest life decisions.
“So, if one is planning to rid oneself of a property in under six years, one must either be a really bad investor or already has speculative motives.”
MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek hoped that increasing the RPGT would dampen property speculation, but said the Government had to build more affordable houses in the long run.
“Houses with grossly inflated prices are beyond the reach of many Malaysians,” he added.
In JOHOR BARU, first-time homebuyers hope that increasing the RPGT would improve their chances of owning a property.
Operations manager Sean Cheng, 26, welcomed the move but said the Government should think of more ways to control property prices because “the tax will be quite pointless if the developers increase the price of houses”.
Businessman S. Jason Raj, 35, suggested raising the RPGT to at least 50% for foreign buyers.
Executive assistant Natasha Farhana Rohaizat, 24, agreed with the increase in the RPGT, saying: “I feel that it is the speculators who buy and sell property that is making the prices of houses constantly go up.” - The Star

Saturday, October 26, 2013

Budget 2014: Property measures timely


Budget 2014: Property measures timely

All of them agree that the overall budget for the property sector is good and are of the view that the the new RPGT which imposes a 30% tax on gains within the first three years of disposal upon the signing of the sale and purchase agreement coupled with the removal of DIBS will help curb speculation. (See table)
The new RPGT, effective Jan 1, 2014, targets individuals and companies. It is a more stringent regime and has more bite than the previous regime.
Says BIMB property sector analyst Law Mei Chi: “Many have expected the RPGT. The impact will be on the secondary market and may slow down transactions. What is good from the budget vis-a-vis the property sector is the removal of DIBS.
“However, the increase in the RPGT might discourage some speculators but the strong holding power (of buyers) due to the low interest rate environment will provide a buffer for speculators to hold a property longer before disposing of it.
“The removal of DIBS may affect many high-end developers.”
Another analyst who declined to be named said he was “pleased” with the propertymeasures in the sense that they were “lower than expected”. “At least there was no reduction in the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio to 60% or a rise in stamp duties,” he explained.
As for the removal of DIBS, he said he was not at all worried about that impacting developers negatively, as “they (developers) can still circumvent (the removal) with rebates.”
Meanwhile, the Association of ValuersProperty Managers, Estate Agents &Property Consultants in the Private Sector Malaysia (PEPS) publicity chairmanJames Wong said the new regime was a more effective anti-speculation tool. The previous regime involved a 15% tax in the first two years of disposal.
Property is a long-term investment and this new regime actually promotes long-term investment among investors and, at the same time, also helps to prevent excessive speculation,” Wong said.
“Government revenue will also increase. In 2011, the revenue received from RPGT was RM1.24bil and this involved a tax of 10% for the first two years.
“In 2012, RPGT revenue is estimated to be between RM1.5mil and RM2bil. This increase will help to bring more revenue to the government,” Wong said.
Wong said the 5% tax on companies and non-citizens was also significant as it involved disposal from the sixth and subsequent years.
“This will stamp bulk buying by foreigners with speculative intentions. However, it will also affect Iskandar Malaysia, if there is excessive speculation there but on a longer time, it will bring confidence into that market. In the interim, there may be a slight slowdown in sales but in six months to a year, it will self-correct.”

Budget 2014: Initiatives a big boost for affordable housing

DEVELOPERS and property consultants said the Government’s affordable housing initiatives proposed under Budget 2014 would ensure better planning, coordination and execution to meet the urgent demand for such housing units among the lower and middle-income group.
Managing director of property consultancy VPC Alliance Malaysia Sdn Bhd James Wong said the Government’s initiative to establish the National Housing Council (NHC) to develop strategies and action plans to build affordable housing priced from RM150,000 to RM450,000 would help to streamline and plan the one-million-unit target of affordable housing over a five-year period.
“Under the plan, we would need to build 200,000 units of affordable houses a year. But national statistics have shown that only 50,000 units have been built over the past few years, a shortfall of some 40%,” Wong told StarBizWeek.
“It is a very opportune time for all the parties involved – 1Malaysia People’s Housing Programme (PR1MA), state governments, local authorities and private developers – to plan, coordinate and implement strategies towards the affordable housing cause for each state,” added Wong, who is also the publicity chairman and past president of The Association of Valuers, Property Managers, Estate Agents &Property Consultants in the Private Sector Malaysia or PEPS.
Wong said industry estimates showed some 1.7 million households, equivalent to 6.8 million people and some 25% of the country’s population, were still without housing.
The NHC is to develop strategies and action plans in a holistic manner, coordinate legal aspects and the property price mechanism, and ensure the provision of homes in a more efficient and expeditious manner. The council members will comprise federal agencies, state governments, the National Housing Department, PR1MA, Syarikat Perumahan Negara Bhd and the private sector.
Mah Sing Group Bhd group managing director and chief executive Tan Sri Leong Hoy Kum lauded the Private Affordable Ownership Housing Scheme (MyHome) proposal as a positive move for developers to play their part in meeting the affordable housing needs.
“There would be a subsidy of RM30,000 for private developers for each unit built, and the maximum prices have been increased to RM45,000 for low-cost and RM170,000 for medium-cost units. We look forward to exploring this opportunity to see if we have any locations that are suitable for this scheme,” Leong added.
See Hoy Chan Holdings Group director Datuk Teo Chiang Kok said developers had been building low-cost and low-medium-cost houses for the past 30 years that had been largely based on a cross-subsidy model borne by free-market house buyers.
“The subsidy from the Government would lighten the burden of house buyers, especially those in the low-income group and encourage developers to partake in the affordable housing cause,” said Teo.
Real Estate and Housing Developers’ Association Penang chairman Datuk Jerry Chan, meanwhile, said the Government’s proactive role to take the lead in the affordable housing policy was a very positive move. - The Star

Investors cooled by Singapore moves

MALAYSIAN Ann Tan relocated to Singapore last July. She was granted permanent residence status in June this year and aspires to have her own place instead of renting.
She hopes to earn enough to afford a S$1mil apartment as she is not eligible for the Housing Development Board (HDB) subsidy for flats that is offered to citizens.
Tan is one of many who are determined to secure a Singapore property in spite of the cooling measures introduced by the government. Whether she succeeds or not, only time will tell, as the various measures instituted by the Singapore government thus far have been across the board, targeted at developers, Singaporeans, foreigners and holders of permanent residences.
In a report on Singapore Property Market: Proprietary Housing Part II dated Oct 17, research house Credit Suisse revisited the survey it did a year earlier, this time with a special focus on affordability. It also took into consideration the impact of the latest four rounds of tightening measures, some of which were considered as the most stringent. The survey was conducted on a sample size of 300.
The Singapore government has since 2009 introduced nine rounds of tightening measures to cool the property market.
The last several rounds (there were three this year) require buyers to pay a larger downpayment with a shorter repayment tenure, forking out additonal buyer’s stamp duty and other stringent macro-prudential measures to limit over-leverage, among others.
As a result of these slew of measures, Credit Suisse says the Singapore government may have achieved its objective to cool the island’s property market, finally.
Says Credit Suisse research analyst Yvonne Voon said in the report: “Investment appetite has been impacted after four further rounds of tightening since our previous July 2012 survey with 46% respondents indicating that they will not be buying residential property anytime soon.”
The report also said that “buyer appetite is still skewed (towards) properties less than S$1mil, with 85% saying they are not willing to spend more than S$1mil on their purchase. But they are willing to compromise on the property size for proximity to the mass rapid transit.”
With the global economic situation in a state of flux and possible interest rate increase going forward, Credit Suisse expects overall prices to remain “flattish” on the island state.
Incidentally, over the past four decades, Singapore’s private property prices had fallen only three times. In each of these cases, the fall was triggered by external shocks, among them the 1985 oil crisis, the Asian financial crisis, the dot.com crisis and the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and the Global FinancialCrisis in 2008. Aside from these, prices have not corrected beyond 5%.
“We do not expect ‘panic selling’ (unless we encounter an external shock) as the recent purchases have been acquired under a much more stringent process,” says Voon.
Over the last three years, Singapore households – as with every household around the world – have benefited from low interest interests post-Global Financial Crisis.
The Singapore economy has also benefited from low unemployment rate (2%) and rising household income. This has boosted their affordability.
Now that the interest rate outlook has changed in view of the eventual tapering by the US Federal Reserve, Credit Suisse says it would be realistic to assume that affordability could start falling.
The research house also asked respondents if they knew how much they would have to fork out if interest rates were to increase by 2%. About 40% said “No” while an equal proportion said their monthly mortgage commitment are expected their go up by as much as 20%.
Aside from affordability and the impact of rising interest rates, the report also drew attention to the dependence on leverage in the pursuit to have their dream home, or dream investment.
The report quoted Monetary Authority of Singapore managing director Ravi Menonas saying that “many households could have over-extended themselves, fuelled by (years of) low interest rates and stretched loan tenures.
“The vast majority of mortgage loans in Singapore are on floating rate packages, which means households will face higher monthly repayments when interest rates normalise,” Ravi said.
He also said that mortgages accounted for as much as 46% of Singapore’s gross development product, up from 35% three years ago and that if mortgage rates were to rise by three percentage points, the proportion of borrowers at risk could reach 10% to 15% from an estimated 5% to 10% who are already over-leveraged on their property purchases.
On a broader basis, Ravi said that housing loans and loans for building and construction made up 28% of total non-bank loans. Of the housing loans, 70% are for owner-occupied properties.
“Our sentiment indicators highlight that 42% of the survey respondents know of people who are having trouble meeting repayments or living on an extremely tight budget, and 46% would become over-stretched if monthly instalments were to rise by up to 30%, Credit Suisse says.
The median household income in Singapore is RM6,772 per month including employer CPF contribution, and S$6,000 per month without it.
Does this combination of rising interest rates and falling affordability spell the end of the investment demand?
It certainly seems that way with 46% surveyed saying that they will not be buying anytime soon. Their concerns are not not limited to just rising rates but over supply of residential units, and the possibility of a fall in price going forward. A total of 88% said they will only buy when prices fall. The bulk of them also expect discounts from developers, from 5% to as high as 20%.
Surprisingly, despite the value of today’s currencies, more than a third of those surveyed continue to believe that cash is king in today’s volatile markets.
Has investment demand shifted overseas? Interestingly, for a country perceived to have fairly sophisticated investors, only 44% said “Yes”. Their first choice is Australia, followed by Johor’s Iskandar Malaysia, with as high as 77% of the 300 respondents possibly moving to Iskandar. - The Star

Budget 2014: RM1.9bil allocated for affordable housing

KUALA LUMPUR: The Government allocated RM1.9bil this year to build 123,000 affordable homes in strategic locations throughout the country by 1Malaysia People's Housing (PR1MA), Syarikat Perumahan Negara Berhad (SPNB) and the National Housing Department.
The Finance Ministry, in its Economic Report 2013/2014 released Friday, said RM500mil was allocated to PR1MA to build 50,000 homes in prime locations across the country and another RM300mil to build 30,000 homes in collaboration with private developers.
A total of 320,000 people will own their own homes under the affordable housing programme, when the homes costing between RM100,000 and RM400,000 per unit are expected to be completed in 2016.
PR1MA homes, which are generally 20% cheaper than the current market price, are sold through an open balloting system and are expected to be ready in three years.
For low-income earners, the government has allocated RM320mil to SPNB to build 22,855 homes, including 1,855 medium-cost apartment units and 10,000 units of public housing projects, to be completed in 2015.
Meanwhile, the Government also allocated RM543mil to the National Housing Department to construct 20,454 unit of People's Housing Programme (PPR) units using the Industrialised Building System.
In line with its efforts to create an IT-savvy generation and to equip the people with the latest information, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) has allocated RM150mil to establish 1Malaysia Internet centres (PI1M) in urban PPR areas.
It was reported that by August 2013, some 359 PI1M were established.
In addition to the high housing market prices, the young generation in the country has difficulty in making the downpayment to purchase a home.
Therefore, the government has introduced the My First Home Scheme, a home financing scheme enjoyed by young people earning less than RM5,000 for individual or joint income of up to RM10,000 and, in August 2013, some 108 applicants received approval from the banking system.
Apart from addressing the issue of housing, the government has also expanded the urban public transport network.
"Syarikat Prasarana Negara Berhad launched Rapid Kuantan in December 2012 following the success of Rapid KL and Rapid Penang," the report said.
KTM Komuter has also extended its 50% discount on fares to all Malaysians earning less than RM3,000 since November 2012, in addition to the discounts given to pensioners, the disabled and students with a total of 158,000 passengers have benefited from the discount since June 2013. - Bernama