Saturday, May 26, 2012

Look at the fine print in guaranteed rental returns


CALL them what you like leasebacks, buy-to-let, cash back, own-for-free developers have come up with creative plans to woo investors with guaranteed rental returns (GRRs) on yet-to-be-built properties.
Developers would agree to pay buyers rentals ranging from 8% to 12% per annum or a proportion of the purchase price for a certain length of time.
This kind of purchase, which has become increasingly common judging from the press advertisements, sounds enticing to investors who do not want the trouble of managing their own investments. You buy the property, and you get the rental returns thrown in.
While GRRs could be very attractive, investors need to know that the scheme is not as simple as it seems, much like ads that appeal to our desire to lose weight quickly, get rich fast or strike the lottery.
Realistic rentals
If a developer is offering GRRs, the buyer has no way of knowing whether that property is going to achieve the promise in the open market. The developer may not be able to get the guaranteed rent or the property may not be let out at all during the guaranteed period.
Pitfalls
Generally, GRRs are best for the laidback investor. Some people will value the “simplicity” of the deal. However there are issues that buyers have to be aware of and comfortable with before entering into such agreements.
A typical mortgage lasts 20 years. If you have a guaranteed rental for just three years, what will happen for the next 17 years? You are left to sink or swim on your own.
A typical table of returns will show potential buyers a surplus income. A potential investor has to take into account the cost of maintaining the property, the taxes that come with being a property owner, the cost of maintaining the mortgage and all other fees related to acquiring the property.
Under most GRR schemes, you will need to buy a furniture package with the apartment and commit yourself to the management charges and sinking fund of the building, on top of the regulatory quit rent and assessment tax.
These will often take a substantial bite out of any rental money left each month.
GRRs are specifically aimed at selling units to investors, so you may see a situation of 500 apartments all going to the rental market rather than owner-occupiers at the end of the scheme. You will need to consider how many people will be chasing tenants at the end of the guarantee period and most particularly how many prospective tenants there are.
In areas of high competition, landlords will have to reduce the rent to attract available tenants. Consequently, the market value of the properties will go down rather than up.
If you decide to sell, you will also be limited to buyers who will also be mainly investors. Sellers will also find themselves competing with developers who are offering higher rental returns with new developments.
Overpricing When supply is more than demand, developers always look for ways to avoid having to reduce prices. While GRRs may offer attractive secure returns, it will be a false economy in the long run if the buyer ends up overpaying for the property.
A guarantee is only as good as the company who underwrites it. Even if the GRRs seem reasonable and are offered with honourable intentions, investors need to be sure that the developer would be able to sustain the returns if the rental or sales market were to take a turn for the worse. If developers were to default on the payments due to buyers, these buyers will likely default on their respective loan repayments, thereby setting off a chain of events with dire consequences.
Terms and conditions in GRR agreements are not regulated by law. As such, the inexperienced investors may not understand that the fine prints are often written in the guarantors' favour. Example of such clauses:
“Provided always and it is hereby agreed between the contracting parties hereto that the Developer reserves its right to terminate the GRR agreement for any reason whatsoever by giving TWO (2) MONTHS written notice to the Purchaser wherein such a case the Developer's obligation to pay the guaranteed return to the Purchaser shall cease from the date of such termination. Such notice is deemed to have been received within three (3) days from the date of the letter”
Purchaser's nightmare
Quite sometime ago, we received an email from an observer who was at a developer's office. He narrated this incident where he witnessed an elderly Ah Pek who had just taken “vacant possession” of his investments, comprising four units of apartments with a GRR scheme. He was demanding that the developer “take back” the units and give him a full refund on the purchases.
The Ah Pek had discovered that the four units he purchased under the developer's GRR scheme had depreciated in value by 25%. To rub salt to the wound, the developer had terminated the GRR scheme as allowed in their agreement, leaving the Ah Pek frustrated with his “failed” investment. The elderly Ah Pek wept in full view of all present at the developer's office! Did the “generous” developer give the Ah Pek any refund? Your guess is as good as mine.
In another case reported in the local papers two years ago, a group of investors filed a legal suit to claim from the developer whom they alleged had breached their agreements. They were practically throwing good money after bad. Win or lose, lawyers collected their fees upfront.
Buyers beware
The rental market is volatile, depending on current competition and market conditions. People investing in these schemes are not just buying properties that they hope will increase in value in time, but also using “other people's” money (from rentals) to pay for the purchase. It is, however, a cyclical market, and one is subject to the laws of supply and demand as in any other sector of the economy.
GRRs offered to investors should be checked carefully against the local market and competition. A simple survey within the location will give an investor a fair idea of the state of the local market. If market prices are lower than the proposed rent, incentives and discounts being offered to woo the buyers, then this are issues to be considered. If guarantees of rentals are higher than the existing market rate, then a rent decline after the end of the guarantee is likely. It is a classic case of caveat emptor rental guarantees can sometimes guarantee investors nothing but heartache.
Anyone who has any real estate experience knows there is no such thing as a guaranteed rental. Real estate, as with any other type of investment, has its ups and downs. There are times when one cannot rent out. Any developer or any person (mind you) who says that he is able to predict the future is “bluffing.”
Our economic cycle goes through cyclical changes that response to economic and other happenings in, as well as, outside our country. Projected monetary returns that cannot be guaranteed (or self-guaranteed) are doubtful in nature.
Had it been so profitable, don't you think that the developer, their shareholders and related companies would have snapped them up before being available in the market? Why don't they keep it for themselves? Guaranteed returns should be accompanied by documentary proof of a trust account nothing more nothing less.
Chang Kim Loong is the honorary secretary-general of The National House Buyers Association, a non-profit, non-governmental, non-political organisation manned by volunteers. For more information, checkwww.hba.org.my or e-mail info@hba.org.my

Continuous improvement needed for developers to remain competitive


FIABCI MALAYSIA is urging local property developers to “raise the bar” in order to remain competitive at the annual FIABCI Prix d’Excellence Awards, which comprises the best of the best from around the world.
“The Malaysian real estate projects are some of the world’s best in the true sense. (However), the competition will get tougher each year as more and more countries enter the competition with their own national winners,” FIABCI Malaysia president Yeow Thit Sang said recently at an appreciation dinner for Malaysian developers that were honoured at this year’s FIABCI Prix d’Excellence Awards.
Yeow however commended the Malaysian companies that were recognised at this year’s Prix d’Excellence Awards.
“There is total transparency and independence in the judging process. None of the 47 judges knew who was marking which project. There was no comparison of opinion between any of them. All the marks were given independently,” he says.
FIABCI Malaysia is the organiser of the annual Malaysia Property Awards (MPA), which is considered the “Oscars” of the property industry.
Over the years, there has been an increasing emphasis on the environment and participants at the MPA have to take this into consideration.
“The impact a particular project has on the environment currently accounts for between 20% and 25% of the judging criteria,” says Yeow.
He also says the standard of judging for the MPA has increased over the years.
“It comprises a four-tier process,” says Yeow, adding that the judges comprise past presidents of FIABCI Malaysia.
“We also have a public auditor who collates all the marks,” he says.
Winners of the MPA in their relevant categories will go on to represent Malaysia the following year at the FIABCI International Prix d’Excellence, an annual competition that honours the world’s best property projects.
This year’s FIABCI Prix d’Excellence Awards, which was held in May at St. Petersburg, Russia, crowned four Malaysian developments in total, namely UEM Land Holding Bhd (for the Master Plan category), Mulpha International Bhd (Residential Low Rise) category, SP Setia Bhd(Specialised Project/Purpose-Built category and Sunway City (Ipoh) Sdn Bhd (Resort category).
Established in 1992, this year’s MPA will be held in November.
Separately, Yeow says he is optimistic about the outlook of the local property market for this year, adding however that things can turn for the worse should the global economic situation deteriorates.
“The economies of the world have a great influence on the local market. If Europe and the United States are affected – because they are buying from us, it will affect us. Eventually, our products cannot sell and there will be unemployment.
“Once unemployment comes in, the real estate market will be affected. If you’ve bought a house and you’re servicing the loan and lose your job, what are you going to do?” — The Star

One step closer to new look


THE proposed upgrading of the Chowrasta Market in George Town has taken a step towards reality.
The Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) has approved a budget of RM12.07mil for the project, said its financial management sub-committee alternate chairman Tan Hun Wooi.
He said the project’s architect would have to submit the paperwork for the project in a month or two.
Tan was, however, unable to say when the project would start as the paperwork had to be reviewed after submission.
“The project is expected to be completed in three years after work starts,” he said at an MPPP full council meeting at the City Hall yesterday.
It was reported earlier that the market would sport a refreshing new look under the project which, among others, would include a five-storey car park with 153 parking bays.
Other proposals include travelators, a small bank with automated teller machines, a post office and an urban farm on the rooftop where hydroponic plants could be grown.
The original Chowrasta Market was built in 1890 by the George Town Municipal Council and was last upgraded in 1961.
On another matter, MPPP councillor Muhammad Sabri Md Osman said the road heading from Jalan Sekolah La Salle towards Jalan Lumba Kuda via Jalan Kuda would be turned into a one-way street from Monday to Friday (6.30am to 8am and 12.30pm to 2pm) to alleviate traffic congestion.
“Part of Jalan Ibbetson (from the junction of Jalan Grove) to the entrance of SM Teknik Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra will also be turned into a one-way street during the same periods,” he said.
He said a three-month trial of the one-way street system on the two roads would be implemented from next month. - The Star

Affordable housing move


DEVELOPERS who opt to build 87 housing units per acre (0.4ha) on Penang island will now have to allocate 15% of their projects for units priced between RM200,000 and RM300,000.
This is an increase of 5% as the previous requirement for such units for that plot ratio was 10%, said Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) councillor Felix Ooi Keat Hin.
He said developers who take up the plot ratio were able to build more units and, as such, they needed to also build more affordable ones too.
“It is an initiative by the state to build more affordable housing,” Ooi said at a full council meeting at the City Hall in the Esplanade, Penang, yesterday.
He said developers who opted for that plot ratio also had to allocate 5% of their project for units priced RM200,000 and below, and 5% for units priced between RM300,000 and RM500,000.
ull agenda: Councillors discussing matters at the full council meeting at the City Hall.
MPPP Public Health Standing Committee alternate chairman Ong Ah Teong said Alunan Matrik Sdn Bhd had been awarded the tender to manage the use of electronic bunting on street lamps.
He said the award was made through an open tender conducted in June last year.
He said the company would be allowed to put up 100 panels on selected street lamps for which they had to pay the council RM720 per panel a year in addition to a RM10,000 deposit for all 100 panels.
“The company have to comply with regulations set by the council such as a ban on alcohol advertisements,” Ong said, adding that the e-buntings would be up in July.
When contacted, Alunan Matrik marketing vice-president Patricia Pee said the e-bunting was an initiative by the company to go green as there would be no ink and paper wastage. - The Star

Friday, May 25, 2012

Mah Sing may gain up to 25% margins from Southville


KUALA LUMPUR: Property developer Mah Sing Group Bhd is expected to benefit from its latest land purchase in Bangi, Selangor, due to the large pre-tax profit margins the company can gain from the development.
Analysts said the development of Southville City on the Bangi land could achieve pre-tax profit margins of up to 25%.
The project would be developed on a 408-acre freehold land and four-acre leasehold land.
Maybank Investment Bank Bhd analyst Wong Wei Sum said in a report that the development, slated for a launch in the first-half of 2013, could translate into a net profit of RM50mil per annum or six sen per share. This is on the assumption of a 25% pre-tax profit margin and an eight-year development period.
She has retained a “hold” rating on the stock on the premise that higher interest costs had lowered the company's 2012-2013 net profit forecasts by 0.2% to 1.2% and had also raised net profit forecast for 2014 by 4.7%.
“Post-acquisition, Mah Sing's net gearing would jump to 0.6 times from 0.3 times as at end-Dec 2011. There's no change to our RM2.95 revised net asset value estimate,” Wong added.
Hong Leong IB said it was “positive” on the land acquisition.
“We are positive on this acquisition as land cost makes up 16% of overall gross development value, meaning margins should be healthy.
“This is a very quick turnaround project, with Phase 1 to be launched in the second half of this year. We expect earnings contribution to commence in the first half of 2013. Phase 1 will comprise double-storey link homes indicatively priced from RM530,000.”
Hong Leong IB has retained its “buy” call on Mah Sing with a target price of RM2.44, which is a 30% discount to revised net asset value.
Meanwhile, analysts at Kenanga Research have maintained their “market perform” rating on the stock and lowered their target price to RM2 from RM2.18 previously.
They said that it was a sector-driven call due to the unexciting sector dynamics, coupled with Mah Sing's higher-than-average net gearing level among developers under their coverage. - The Star

Inspired by famous Oz market


BY December, people of Paya Terubong in Penang will have a wet market with a modern and dynamic architectural design and facilities complete with a food court.
The Sri Aman Food Court and Wet Market costing RM5mil is a project by developer Chong Company Sdn Bhd under its Corporate Social Responsibility programme.
The project is built on a 0.76ha land in Persiaran Paya Terubong 3.
At the site: A view of the Sri Aman Food Court and Wet Market contruction in progress in Persiaran Paya Terubong 3, Penang
Chong Company executive director Chan Fock Seng said the project was currently under the third phase of construction.
“The building can accommodate 50,000 people and it will be the first wet market and food court complex in Paya Terubong.
“The design is inspired by the Queen Victoria Market in Melbourne, Australia, with high ceilings for good ventilation, car parking bays, loading area, motorcycle parks, toilets and washing area,” he said.
An artist's impression of the new market's interior
“It will house 143 stalls in the wet market section and 37 stalls in the food court section,” he told reporters after visiting the project site with state Local Government and Traffic Management Committee chairman Chow Kon Yeow recently.
Chow commended the company’s Green Initiatives Plan to incorporate a Recycling Centre, Natural Ventilation, Sun Shading, Skylight (Natural Lighting) & Low Energy Fittings into the project.
He said: “It is the state’s hope to upgrade the facilities and outlook of wet markets and to do away with the perception of them being smelly and unclean places.
“The state government through both the Penang Municipal Council and the Seberang Prai Muni- cipal Council have spent over RM10mil to upgrade the wet markets on the island and on the mainland.” - The Star

初步概念翻新巴刹店面 乔治市商业改进区现形


(槟城24日讯)乔治市商业改进区计划(BIDS)逐渐“现形”,初步概念中,旧社尾巴刹一带将改头换面,除了翻新巴刹及店面,也提议建立图书馆、文化中心、房屋等。Think City项目经理许仁强在槟州首长林冠英的陪同下,于周四在光大首长办公室向媒体呈献初步概念。商业改进区计划委员会由槟州发展机构担任主席,而Think City与国库控股则为先锋队。
许仁强表示,经过1年半时间与多个单位讨论后才拟出大蓝图,概念建立在5个设计理念上,即衔接、绿意、民众安全、包含性及多元化,可分为5个阶段进行,涉及范围从柑仔园时代广场到加马购物中心、头条路、槟榔路以及林萃龙路。“无论如何,这只是大概念,还未细节化,也不是最后定案,因为与州政府、市政局、私人领域等多方面合作,配合交通大蓝图,还有寻求民众意见等。”
他接着说,该概念中,第1阶段涉及柑仔园路的连接,第2阶段是林萃龙路及头条路、第3阶段将提升光大及新光大,而最后一个阶段是翻新旧社尾巴刹一带区域。他透露,其中新光大顶楼的建议是要设立空中花园、室内足球场、滑板公园等。
他提及,HENG LEE & CO有限公司、玮力产业集团、第一大道广场、新光大、槟州发展机构、加马百货(GAMA)、龙城酒店(Cititel Express)、PLENITUDE公司、乐台居等已纷纷提供建议。林冠英表示,州政府注重绿意及公共空间的提升。民众若有任何意见都可寄至Bidi@thinkcity.com.my。出席者包括槟州发展机构总经理拿督罗斯里、光大区州议员黄伟益等。- 光华

Thursday, May 24, 2012

SP Setia has big plans in Penang


GEORGE TOWN: After recently acquiring 21.3 acres in Tanjung Bungah for RM185.6mil, SP Setia Bhd is now looking at an adjacent 14-acre site.
SP Setia Property (North) divisional general manager Datuk S. Rajoosaid the group was now in an advanced stage of negotiation to buy the property.
“We expect to ink the deal soon. The two properties are an integral part of the group's business plan to launch about RM2.5bil worth of properties on the island this year and in 2013,” Rajoo said.
“Land on the island is becoming scarce. Since SP Setia wants to continue playing a dominant role in the property market on the island, it is seizing every opportunity to expand its landbank, capitalising on attractive deals,” he said.
SP Setia's business plans for Penang include the launch of residential and commercial properties worth over RM638mil in the second half of 2012.
In 2013, besides the RM1.1bil project in Tanjung Bungah, SP Setia will also launch a RM175mil condominium project in Sungai Nibong, and the Wave and Breeze condominium projects for Setia Pearl Island, with a gross development value (GDV) of RM350mil and RM300mil respectively.
“In the second half 2012, the key projects include the RM250mil Setia Triangle, the RM335mil Setia Greens 2, and a RM53mil condominium project in Teluk Kumbar,” he said.
The Setia Triangle project on 6.8 acres in Setia Pearl Island comprises two-, three-, and four-storey shop offices with built-up areas of 3,000 sq ft, 4,500 sq ft, and 6,000 sq ft respectively. Each unit will be priced between RM1.95mil and RM3.6mil.
“There will also be a residential component comprising a 225-unit condominium, priced between RM575,000 and RM1.2mil,” Rajoo said.
The Wave consists of 535 condominium units priced from RM300,000 to RM750,000, while the Breeze comprises 450 units with a price tag of RM500,000 onwards.
“The scheme in the Teluk Kumbar development comprises 98 condominium units with built-up areas of 1,000 sq ft and 1,4000 sq ft, priced between RM500,000 and RM700,000.
“To date, we have launched over RM1.1bil worth of residential properties in Setia Pearl Island. Once the Setia Triangle, Wave, and Breeze are launched, the GDV for Setia Pearl Island will rise to RM2bil,” he said.
Rajoo said SP Setia had also recently acquired two pieces of land in Balik Pulau for RM38mil, where the group planned to develop both landed and high-rise properties.
He added that the group's projects in Penang should generate about 15% of the its revenue for the fiscal year ending Oct 31. - The Star

Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Rehda eyes RM10b 'green allocation'


THE Real Estate and Housing Developers' Association Malaysia (Rehda) is lobbying for a RM10 billion annual allocation from the government to help upgrade existing buildings to be energy efficient.

The association wants this to be in the 2013 Budget.

Rehda president Datuk Seri Michael Yam said the fund would cover up to 30 per cent of the costs to make the buildings green.

With this in mind, the association is also asking the government to recognise other international green certifications like Singapore's Green Mark, Australia's Green Star, UK's BREEAM and the United States' LEED.
This was to enable those buildings already certified with those certifications to qualify for incentives provided by the government, Yam said.

Among other incentives that Rehda is seeking are stamp duty waiver for transfer of green certified properties from developers to buyers for the next five years, and double tax deduction on training expenses incurred by property development firms.

Yam said this yesterday at the launch of "Green Tour KL 2", a showcase of prestigious green rated developments in the Klang Valley.

Green Tour KL 2 is organised by Rehda Youth. It was officiated by Datuk Loo Took Gee, the secretary-general for the Energy, Green Technology and Water Ministry.

Yam said the building sector, at present, contributed about 40 per cent of the global greenhouse gas emissions but added that it could be reduced as green buildings had lower carbon emissions.

Currently, less than 0.5 per cent of all commercial and residential buildings in Kuala Lumpur were green certified, Yam said.

During Green Tour KL 2, projects showcased were the new Rehda headquarters in Kelana Jaya; KEN Rimba, Legian Residences, a project by KEN Holdings Bhd in Shah Alam; 11 Mont Kiara by Sunrise Bhd, a unit of UEM Land Holdings Bhd; Sime Darby Idea House in Shah Alam; and S11 House here. - Business Times

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

大吉隆坡放眼全球20大城市 科技专家:需克服四大挑战

在打造智能城市(Smart City)方面经验丰富的跨国企业IBM指出,大吉隆坡/大巴生谷(Greater KL/Klang Valley)想要在2020年之际,在经济增长方面排名全球前20大,并成为全球20大最适合居住的城市,就必须克服眼前四大挑战,包括如何成为外资投资首选地点、打造绿色环境、提升公共交通使用率,以及营造适合居住的城市环境。

IBM东盟区荣誉工程师兼科技总监冯修文(译音,Foong Sew Bun)今天出席由亚洲策略与领导机构(ASLI)主办的《第二届大吉隆坡全国峰会》时表示,大吉隆坡/大巴生谷放眼在2020年之际,实现“20-20”目标,即在经济增长方面排名全球前20大,并成为全球20大最适合居住的城市。

他认为,如果大吉隆坡想要达到以上目标,就必须克服眼前四大挑战包括如何成为外资投资首选地点、打造绿色环境、提升公共交通使用率,以及营造适合居住的城市环境。

马来西亚并非外资公司的首选投资地点,目前只有1600家外资公司来马投资和营运。相比之下,新加坡有6000家外资公司、中国北京有4000家外资公司,而中国上海则有1万7000家外资公司。- Merdeka Review