Sunday, June 10, 2012

Sales pitch from Canada


LAST week, a group of fairly young people organised a lunch at a club to promote and market some townhouses in Alberta, Canada. There are a few things about the investment propostion that comes across as rather interesting. Whether it will be profitable or not is another matter. The objective of this article is, therefore, to highlight the different types of property-investment offerings that are entering the market as a result of Asia being rather buoyant, despite the woes in US and Europe.
First, it was the first time that properties as far away as Canada are being promoted this way. Usually, agents will just opt for an advertisement. Vision International Properties did that, besides other things.
One may ask, why Canada? Seems so far away when there are properties in Britain, Australia and Singapore to choose from. Malaysians generally invest in British and Australian property because they have children studying in these countries, or because they themselves studied there. There is, therefore, the emotional and sentimental ties. As for Singapore, it is just an hour away by plane and they frequent the city state and so they decide to buy something in Singapore.
The other thing interesting about this Canadian proposition is that, the director of Vision International is a Malaysian who studied in Canada, worked in an international consultancy firm there for about a year before deciding to go full time into property investment with a partner. Virata Gamany, the Malaysian director has now decided to return to Malaysia to start a branch here, besides other branches in Singapore and China.
An artist impression of Chestermere Manor, a project comprising 96 units of townhouses being marketed by Vision International Properties.
Thirdly, Virata, 28, is offering an investment proposition which, thus far, is fairly new to Malaysian residential buyers, to a degree.
Unlike local Malaysian agents representing foreign developers and house builders to promote an overseas property development here, which they sell to Malaysians and other investors in other parts of Asia, Virata and his partners are neither agents nor developers.
They instead bulk purchase into a project in Canada, which they then sell to Malaysians and other investors. It is very much like the Middle-Eastern investors who bought en bloc units in the KLCC area and then sold the units to other buyers at a lower rate than the developer. They are able to do this because they buy multiple units.
In the case of Vision International, it is uncertain whether the properties come at na discounted rate from the developer's price. But they will manage the property on behalf of investors.
In other words, one buy into their project, in this case, Chestermere Manor, which comprises 96 units of townhouses in Calgary, Alberta, not to stay, but to be rented out at a gross yield of between 7% and 8% a year.
He said they will help investors enter into the market easier by assisting with bank loans and legal paperwork and manage the properties and look for tenants. Investors will have to consider the cost of this list of services as it will be factored into the price of the house, or in some other ways.
A two-bedroom unit is priced at C$218,000 with a downpayment of C$76,300. Virata has put the rent at C$1,300 and a string of other fees like property tax, management fee, mortgage expense and condominium fee.
A client can exit anytime because it is a direct ownership, he says.
Virata says Canada is rather low-profiled compared with other destinations but this does not mean a shortage of opportunities. The project he is offering sits on 10 acres, of which about half will be occupied by townhouses. These will be the more affordable alternative to the more pricey three-storey landed units. Vision, he says, is buying nine blocks, of which eight blocks, comprising 96 units, will be sold to investors. They will keep the ninth for investment.
Chestermere Manor is their 19th property investment.
“Our investments are focussed on apartment and condominium units with rentals that are within the range of the average Canadian family. Such properties tend to yield better returns and are less risky,” he says.
There will be regular project updates. Currently, each of the blocks is being built at different stages with the last block expected to be completed in 2014.
Virata says this is investment proposition is neither a Reit (real estate investment trust) nor a land-banking, which had some Malaysian investors losing their life savings earlier this year.
He also suggests investors see the properties for themselves and Vision International will pay for the flight ticket.
“We find it odd that less than 5% of investors ask to see the properties and if not for us providing the return flight tickets, they do not do so.”
While Virata and his team offer a host of conveniences, a property consultant agrees that dealing with one party in this case a property investment company may seem more appealing than buying from an agent who represents a developer, and having to engage letting agents to rent out the unit.
“There is the issue of not knowing who to turn to in the event the desired situation does not materialise for whatever reason, for example, a project not taking off. In the case of having to deal with an agent who represents a developer, and a letting agents, there is a clear separation of duties and responsibilities,” he says.
While Virata's investment proposition may appeal to some, as with other property-related investments abroad, it is worthwhile to note that the low interest rates around the world today has been a major driving force for such investments.
Last week, wire service Bloomberg highlighted the dangers of Canadian housing debt levels.
Canada Mortgage & Housing Corp (CMHC), which called on home buyers to guard against taking on too much debt, cautioned buyers to exercise prudence.
“Interest rates are at historic lows and they are certain to rise in the future. In this context, it is important that they not get overextended,” a CMHC's representative says.
Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney has said that record consumer debt loads are the biggest domestic economic risk, and housing starts reached the highest since 2007 last month.
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty's March 29 budget put CMHC's securitisation and insurance operations under oversight by the country's banking regulator, with Flaherty citing the economic risks posed by the housing boom.
“Strong labour market conditions will continue to drive the construction of new homes, but some diminution of the current robust pace of housing starts is expected later this year and next year,” CMHC's report says.
Housing is also being supported by a five-year mortgage rate that has been at or close to record lows this year. The Bank of Canada said last month it may need to raise its 1% benchmark overnight rate because of faster-than-expected growth and inflation.
The agency said it had mortgage insurance in force worth C$570bil (US$554bil) at the end of March, up 10% from a year earlier. Canadian law requires borrowers with less than a 20% down payment to have their mortgages insured and CMHC has a C$600bil limit on its insurance portfolio.
CMHC said in January it had begun rationing bulk insurance for lenders to keep from exceeding the limit.
All these represent red flags that potential Malaysian investors need to be aware of. It is difficult to monitor an investment that is so far away, and laws and legal system may be different and the way things are done may vary considerably. - The Star

Time is of the essence in the property development sector too


HAVE you been to the Immigration Department recently to renew your passport? I was surprised to hear from a family member that 45 minutes was all that she needed to renew her passport. The process of renewing a passport has indeed positively changed with the time.
I recalled in the past that it took months before one could get a passport renewed. The processing time then reduced to weeks, followed by days and eventually to 45 minutes.
The evolution of improvement in the passport renewal process is beyond doubt, impressive. It is clear proof that things of bigger scale can become more efficient with continuous improvement and commitment to improve.
The improved passport renewal process brings forth many benefits such as less waiting time, and reduction in parking and transportation costs as a second trip to the immigration department to pick up the passport is no longer required. The government, businesses, common people and ultimately, the country are beneficiaries of these successes.
This form of efficiency is greatly required in other industries including the property development industry. Sadly today, the process of getting the necessary approvals for a property development project is extremely lengthy.
In my previous article, I highlighted the negative consequences of introducing “cooling off” measures to curb or control house prices and to stifle temporarily the buying appetite of home buyers.
All these measures not only slow down the rate of production of new houses by developers but create a massive housing backlog in the near future due to the anticipated demand and supply imbalance.
It is therefore essential to increase the supply of new housing units with greater pace to meet the increasing demand and maintain property prices.
Property developers today unfortunately have to wait a year or two to obtain the necessary approvals from several authorities before a project can be launched. Then there is a further two to three years required for the construction and completion of the building. Thus, a condominium project may require a total of at least four to five years before it is ready for occupation.
According to the latest World Bank Doing Business Report, Malaysia was ranked 18th when it comes to the ease of doing business. Last year we were ranked 23rd. However, in terms of Dealing with Construction Permits, our ranking dropped to 113th from 111th last year.
The report also highlighted that Malaysian developers need to go through 22 procedures and spend 260 days in total to obtain the necessary licenses, permits and complete the required notifications and inspections.
Comparatively, Singaporean developers need to undergo 11 procedures and the whole process takes 26 days, imagine if this can be achieved in Malaysia. As for Thailand, developers are required to comply with eight procedures and approximately 157 days to go through the whole process. In the case of Indonesia, the whole process involves 13 procedures and an expected processing time of 158 days.
Our closest neighbours definitely have the edge in terms of speed to start property construction i.e. 6 to 11 months advantage.
For Malaysia to remain competitive against its neighbours and in the same breath, meet the growing demand of its population for new housing units at an affordable price, immediate steps need to be taken to improve the approval process for new housing developments in the same fashion as the immigration department.
It is good to note that the Government is looking into the matter when the Chief Secretary to the Government, Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassanrecently held a Public Consultation with relevant parties, both public and private, to improve efficiency in the construction industry.
As for Kuala Lumpur, the City Hall is also putting in noteworthy effort to shorten the processing time by taking the lead to allow developers to submit their plans online.
When the approval time is shortened and the speed of construction enhanced, the supply of new housing units will increase in momentum and able to respond to the growing demand.
The fear of continuous inflation will be curtailed and at the same time, there will be room for reasonable price appreciation in the future.
For these aspirations to be realised, time efficiency is the essence. It is vital that the relevant agencies, authorities and the private sector set their sights in the same destination and row in the same direction. After all, if you can get a passport renewed in 45 minutes, what else can you expect to speed up? - The Star
FIABCI Asia Pacific Chairman, Datuk Alan Tong, has over 50 years of experience in property development. He was FIABCI World President in 2005/06 and was named Property Man of The Year 2010. He is also the group chairman of Bukit Kiara Properties.

High take-up rate at Dorsett Place Waterfront soft launch


THE Mayland Group says that its latest project, the Dorsett Place Waterfront, saw a high take-up rate of 60% during its soft launch.
The project, comprising 1,989 suites, is strategically tucked between two major landmarks in the mature township of Subang Jaya, the Sime Darby Medical Centre and the five-star Grand Dorsett Hotel Subang.
The location is within a few minutes travelling time to public amenities such as shopping malls, colleges and a KTM station and forthcoming MRT.
“About 1,200 suites were sold during the soft launch. Most of the buyers are residents in Subang Jaya, which clearly shows that the local community is supportive and receptive to the project. In fact, we have been receiving praise and very positive feedback that the project is very acceptable and has come at the right time in the right place,” says Mayland executive director Pel Loh.
The project, maintained by Dorsett International and complete with a range of recreational facilities, is set to create a new benchmark for quality accommodation in Subang Jaya. “The suites are not only affordable but also fully designer-furnished which underscores our catchphrase “Bring only your luggage.”
The introduction of Dorsett Place Waterfront suites is not the first such offering in the market as there have been numerous other similar products offered by hotel chains not only in Malaysia, but also in Australia and the United Kingdom.
“This project is a positive development in support of progress in Subang Jaya. In fact, as a value-added feature for the convenience of the eventual residents, we will be providing complimentary daily shuttles not only to the LRT/MRT and the shopping malls but also to the nearby colleges as we recognise that Subang is an educational hub with a huge student population. The shuttles are also an effective way to reduce the carbon footprint in the area. In any case the town’s facilities are mostly within walking distance.”
Besides serving residents of the Dorsett Place Waterfront, the additional access road will also be a boon to people travelling to the Sime Darby Medical Centre, Grand Dorsett Hotel and Holiday Villa by dispersing traffic as an alternative to Jalan Kewajipan.
“We believe we have more than enough parks bays to serve the needs of all residents,” said Loh, adding that not all residents will be requiring carparks in view of the complimentary shuttles and the convenience of the nearby LRT and MRT. Additionally, the ratio of one suite to carpark number is very low as the suites will house only singles or couples.
“We are committed to seeing to the completion of Dorsett Place and delivering to our buyers our promise of a unique quality lifestyle product.”
The Mayland group, backed by a strong proven track record in the past two decades, has delivered close to 10,000 units to its customers. For more information, contact Mayland’s marketing department at 03- 2692 9663. - The Star

NGO: Freeze hillslope development until all guidelines are revised


GEORGE TOWN: Another non-governmental organisation has urged the state government to immediately freeze all approved hillslope projects until the present guidelines for such development are revised.
Malaysian Nature Society (MNS) Penang branch adviser D. Kanda Kumar said the projects would include those that had been approved but had yet to start work and those that had started work but yet to be completed.
“The state government should look into reducing the height of buildings currently allowed for hillslope development. The density of the projects allowed for hilly areas should be looked into as well,” he said.
Kanda Kumar was commenting on the mushrooming of development projects on hilly areas that had recently sparked off criticisms of the state government's development policy by environmentalists and politicians.
On Monday, the Consumers Association of Penang and Sahabat Alam Malaysia had urged the Federal Government, state government and local authorities to halt all hillslope projects and gazette forests and mangrove areas as permanent forest reserves.
S. M. Idris, who is president of both NGOs, said Penang was becoming “unliveable” due to “mindless development”.
Idris said “whichever government” which gave approval for 31 development projects on hill land above 76m should explain the basis for the approvals.
This followed the statement by Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng on Thursday that the new administration did not approve a single project above 76m since taking office in March 2008.
In a related matter, Bukit Bendera MP Liew Ching Tong of DAP urged the Federal Government to raise the real property gains tax in an effort to curb housing speculation and rising house prices. - The Star

Federal govt gives out RM100mil for R&D projects for 10 years


GEORGE TOWN: The Federal Government is providing RM100mil for 10 years for research and development activities undertaken by the newly launched Collaborative Research in Engineering, Science and Technology Centre (CREST) and the industries to accelerate the growth of the electrical and electronics (E&E) industry.
CREST, a component of the Economic Transformation Programme, was set up by the Government to serve as a platform for industry players, academics and the Government to collaborate and promote research, design and development activities in the E&E sector in Malaysia.
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Tan Sri Nor Mohamed Yakcop said that the E&E industry has been a key driver and leading contributor to Malaysia's industrial development in the last three decades.
“It contributes significantly to the gross domestic product (GDP) growth, export earnings, investment and employment.
“E&E is the single largest contributor of the manufacturing sector, and more than 40% of total exports as well as employs more than 5% of the total workforce,” he said in his speech during the launching of CREST at sains@USM in Bukit Jambul Saturday.
The concept of the centre, which was mooted in 2008, was established by Khazanah Nasional Bhd as the Centre of Engineering Excellence.
It was subsequently established as a company limited by guarantee on June 30, 2011 through the efforts of the Northern Corridor Implementation Authority (NCIA).
The 11 companies and organisations that are CREST founder members are Agilent TechnologiesAltera Corporation (M) Sdn BhdAdvanced Micro Devices (AMD), Avago Technologies, Intel, Motorola, National Instruments, Osram Opto Semiconductors (M) Sdn BhdSilterra Malaysia Sdn Bhd, NCIA and Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM).
The nine companies account for RM25bil in total revenue and RM1.4bil in research and development expenditure, employing 500,000 workers.
CREST has approved RM3.2mil worth of grant for 10 research and development projects.
Malaysian Investment Development Authority chief executive officer Datuk Noharuddin Nordin said that the E&E industry is a regular contributor to new investment and reinvestment in the country.
“I'm happy to note that of the 10 research and development projects that have been approved to receive grants from CREST, half of them come from local companies,” he said.
At the event, the FasTrack programme graduation ceremony was also held where 98 apprentices received their scrolls.
FasTrack is a 12-month apprenticeship programme targeting high-achieving Malaysian engineering graduates. - The Star

Howls against hill projects


As the Chief Minister, Lim Guan Eng must expect to come under scrutiny over how development in Penang, especially on the island, is shaped.
PENANGITES love the hills on the island passionately. Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng may be feeling the heat now but his predecessors from Barisan Nasional have also come under fire over hill development in the state.
The late Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu had to fend off accusations of plans to develop Penang Hill and even the late Datuk Ooi Ean Kwong, the State Assembly Speaker, was not spared. Following allegations of bribes being given for a project that would have blocked the view of the Kek Lok Si temple, he had to allow a motion to proceed in the State Assembly.
The allegation was unproven but the fact is that an ugly apartment block now stands on the foothills of the world-famous pagoda.
No sane local authority would have allowed such a structure to be put up but it did, and the state government came under shelling.
There was also a battle during the 1980s between non-governmental organisations and the state government over the loss of a heritage building belonging to the Christian mission to a prominent developer.
All these issues were prominently carried by the media and one only has to look up the archives to understand the passion of Penangites, who feel they should have a say in how the state is developed.
Penangites prefer a healthy balance between development and their leisurely pace of life. They do not want Penang to be like Kuala Lumpur but neither do they want George Town to be like Kota Baru or Shah Alam, where there is little night life.
As the Chief Minister, Lim Guan Eng must expect to come under scrutiny over how development in the state, especially on the island, is shaped.
There's no need for him to be defensive and claim that he is facing a “media lynching”, assuming there is always an agenda behind every criticism.
He only located himself to Penang after the 2008 general election and it is understandable if he is unaware of the many issues that have been fought in the past between the Penang-based non-governmental organisations and the previous state government leaders.
Some of the current senior state assemblymen and Members of Parliament were not even born in Penang and neither have they stayed long enough there to have a sense of belonging and history of the state.
There are two issues here apart from what they see as insensitive development, many Penangites are feeling the pinch from the increasing cost of property in the state, especially on the island.
Lim has said that this is also a problem in the Klang Valley and Johor Baru but he must understand that there are differences.
In the Klang Valley, for example, the return of investment from the purchase of properties is better because there is a large pool of out-of-state workers and expatriates who make up the rental market. Penang, however, does not have that you are likely to buy an apartment to live in rather than to let out.
Yes, Penang does attract its share of Malaysia My Second Home residents and also wealthy investors but the increasing number of high-end development projects does not match the real demand. But such projects do result in corresponding hikes in entry-level or mid-level properties that the majority of Penangites need.
Many Penangites living in the Klang Valley have found that prices of apartments, especially the middle and upper range, have shot up so much that their dreams of retiring in the state have become near unachievable.
Their only option is the mainland and this writer has many ex-schoolmates who have been forced to move out of the island so they can balance their household budget better. Some have children studying in Kulim where Friday is a holiday while they continue to work in Penang, and juggling this difference over family life has itself become a challenge.
Penangites understand perfectly that land is limited in Penang and reclaiming land is highly expensive. With the cost of raw materials like cement and steel on the rise, developers will try to squeeze as much into a good location to maximise profits.
In terms of location, places like Batu Ferringhi, Tanjung Bungah and Gurney Drive are highly attractive and putting up high-rise apartments seems to be a cost-efficient way for developers. And when these projects are not on reclaimed land but are hugging the surrounding hills, whether at a slope below or higher than 250ft, the impact on the hills will still be there.
You only need to compare the Google Earth pictures of the hills in Penang to see how much damage has been done.
The previous Barisan Nasional state government cannot escape criticism but the present government can revise or stop more of such projects. There is no need to be defensive and argumentative over these issues.
Penangites have always been independent-minded and have a reputation of knocking off every single Chief Minister. They are also among the most outspoken activists around, so do listen well and hard. - The Star

郑雨周与槟民联唱反调 要求禁新港山坡发展


(槟城9日讯)槟州“绿色议员”与槟州民联政府唱反调,要求严禁新港山坡发展计划。丹绒武雅区州议员郑雨周针对引起争议,招来居民反对的新港山坡地发展计划表达立场。尽管他尚未到新港山坡地发展计划现场了解,不过从谷歌地图中(Google Earth)的坡度发现,有关发展计划坐落在海拔250尺以上斜坡地带,同时涉及斜坡度超过25度的第3及第4级山坡地。
他说,尽管有关计划的发展大蓝图(Masterplan)是在前朝政府下批准,然而有关发展计划的建筑图最终还是需市政局批准,地方政府有权力加以否决。他是于周末在罗弄卡惹的迷你公园举行植树仪式后,受询时如是指出。
不过,郑雨周在此计划的立场,与州政府日前通过阿都玛力及市政局主席芭缇雅的立场相左,在此前阿都玛力及芭缇雅指出,在新港山坡的发展计划符合地方政府程序。此外,在2009年出炉截至2020年的槟州结构大蓝图规定,凡超过海拔250呎(76公尺),或25度斜度山坡地段,不被允许进行任何发展计划;不过,允许之前获得批准作为发展用途的山坡地段发展计划拥有豁免权,不须符合严格条件。针对《星报》日前在封面上的“垂死的山林”(dying hill)报道,他认为该报道有夸大其词,然而他也不否认槟州面对发展公司施加压力,寻求山坡地发展,如在其选区内有多个涉及山坡地及海岸的高楼发展计划,正寻求地方政府通过。
关注对自然生态冲击 反对高密度计划
在丹绒武雅选区,有3项山坡地发展计划寻求密度提升,包括将容积率提高至5对1(5:1),其中一项建议是将房屋计划地改为酒店计划用地,发展密度也提高至容积率提高至5对1 ,酒店高度更高达45层楼,当中的山坡地也涉及在第3及第4级斜坡地计划。郑雨周指出,在接获市政局寻求其意见后已提出反对立场,他认为,市政局的一站式图测审核中心已沦为一个检查中心(checking centre),只针对图测符合与否作出审核,反之他认为审核计划不能单凭其技术符合与否,同时要关注对自然生态的冲击。-

Friday, June 8, 2012

Bank Negara says growth on track and sticks to 4% to 5% forecast


KUALA LUMPUR: Bank Negara is maintaining its growth forecast for the country this year at 4% to 5% but is closely monitoring the ongoing debt crisis in Europe, said governor Tan Sri Dr Zeti Akhtar Aziz.
“As of now, the prospect for moderation in growth in the global economy has already been priced in.
“But we recognise the risks that exist if Europe doesn't emerge with a solution to the evolving debt crisis that is unfolding,” Zeti said at a briefing on the Labuan Financial Services Authority's annual report 2011.
She added that should the solutions come, it would resolve many issues. Then, the growth projection would “remain intact”.
Zeti with the Labuan Financial Services Authority’s annual report 2011
However, should things get worse with deep recession taking place in Europe, all global economies would be affected, she said.
“But I would like to highlight that these are not new developments to the region. When the global economy suffered an economic contraction in 2008-2009, Malaysia was able to minimise the contraction to just over 1%,” Zeti said, adding that most countries in Asia then recovered rapidly.
Zeti said should a crisis happen again, Malaysia would be “able to emerge quickly” because the country did not have the kind of conditions prevailing in the crisis-affected countries.
Moreover, Malaysia had low unemployment, continued access to financing, low inflation rate and surplus on its balance of payment current account, she said.
“We have reserves buffer to insulate us from any impact of significant deleveraging and we have a more developed financial system that is able to intermediate the volatility that would emerge out of a major downturn,” she said.
Zeti believes that Asia would be able to rise to the challenge and emerge again to resume its growth potential.
She said the region had also become more cohesive and had come together in terms of surveillance and managing crisis, noting that it now had an integrated crisis management framework in place.
On the softer trade numbers announced recently, Zeti said: “Yes, our exports have declined but we have already priced that in. In fact, it only declined recently and we had expected the moderation to be happening earlier.
“The domestic economy is very strong. Consumption demand, private investment activity is very robust. Because of this, we are still confident it's going to be within the range (of economic growth projection).”
Asked if the current monetary policy would be maintained until year-end, she said it was reviewed at each monetary policy meeting. “The environment is very dynamic and monetary policy is a forward-looking policy.”
At its May 11 meeting, Bank Negara has kept its key interest rate at 3%. - The Star

Engineer: Absence of housing policy pushing prices up


GEORGE TOWN: The absence of a comprehensive state housing policy is the main cause for property prices escalating on Penang island, said Coalition for Good Governance Penang committee member Tan Seng Hai.
He said prices were soaring not because of inadequate supply as claimed by certain quarters.
Tan, who is an engineer, said there was no state policy to curb sub-sales, block sales and gimmicks like soft launches and staff purchases.
“The increase in the price of high-end properties will pull up property prices in the medium and lower end,” he said in a statement here yesterday.
He was commenting on a statement by Penang Real Estate and Housing Developers’ Association chairman Datuk Jerry Chan that property prices on the island would escalate if housing projects on hillslopes were banned as it would result in a shortage of supply.
Tan said there was an oversupply of residential units on Penang island based on figures provided by the Statistics Department and National Property Information Centre.
When contacted, Chan said the population in Penang had tripled in the last 30 years without including foreign workforce.
“Tan could be assuming that one household or one individual owns a single property. But that is usually not the case. Many of them are tenants,” he said. - The Star

Penang CM defends hill projects


GEORGE TOWN: Lim Guan Eng has defended the Penang Government's stand in treating hillslope development, saying that it has the “most stringent” guidelines for it.
The Penang Chief Minister said the present state government had not approved a single project above 250 feet (76m) high, adding that it was the only state in Malaysia which had set such a bar.
“Penang has the most stringent guidelines for hillslope safety development in the country, crafted by Oxford-trained geotechnical engineer Prof Dr Gue See Sew, a former international chairman of the coordinating committee of Apec Engineers and president of the Institute of Engineers Malaysia,” he said in a statement yesterday.
He said that half of the 38 hillslope projects approved the last two years for heights below 76m were for open space and green areas without any building structures.
Lim took a swipe at some other states, which he said allowed development on hills above the height of 76m.
“Thirty-one development projects were approved by the previous Barisan Nasional state government on hill land above 250 feet (76m) compared to none by the present Pakatan Rakyat state government,” he added.
He said according to the Penang Municipal Council, eight projects on hills above 76m were approved from 1985 to 2004, three in 2005, 10 in 2006, eight in 2007 and two between January and March 2008.
The chief minister also addressed the issue of the rise in property prices, saying that there was also a similar rise in Johor and Kuala Lumpur.
The Star had reported on Penang's various hillslope projects and the rise in property prices in the state.
A non-governmental organisation (NGO) here has called on the state government to practise sustainable development.
Citizens Awareness Chant group adviser Yan Lee said hillslope developments would effect environmentally sensitive water catchment areas like Sungai Ara.
“Such developments require proper studies and environmental impact assessment (EIA) reports. Some projects do not require an EIA because of the development size but nonetheless, one should be done if the projects threaten the environment,” he said.
Lee said the Federal Government, through the relevant ministry, had the discretion to request an EIA in such a situation, expressing hope that such discretion would be exercised in hillslope developments here.
“A crematorium project about 1km away from the Ayer Itam Dam recently received planning permission from the Penang Municipal Council. This is an example of where the EIA report is needed, though not required.” - The Star