Tuesday, August 7, 2012

林冠英向新港居民派定心丸 双威城计划过关无望


槟城6日讯)槟州首席部长林冠英再次向新港居民派定心丸,承诺民联执政一天,新港双威城计划(Sunway City)无望过关,居民大可安枕无忧。他是在出席于周日举行的“槟城论坛”会上针对新港一名沈姓女居民提出忧虑时,如是表示。
沈女士担心一旦全国大选尘埃落定民联继续执政后,有关计划或死灰复燃,然林冠英说,若有关发展商在槟城只推行单一计划,那么政府或面对困境,然而若有关发展商在槟城尚有其他计划等着开跑,那么他相信发展商不会与政府对着干。而在新港计划下,首长说居民大可放心,计划在民联执政一天肯定不会上路。
另一方面,首长承认第二大桥在明年开通后将对槟城带来严重交通问题。
首长表示在解决交通问题上槟州政府完全无助(helpless),即使是峇六拜大道也是联邦政府权限,槟州政府要无法管制,即使是这些道路出现窟窿,州政府也不能进场修补。- 光华

Monday, August 6, 2012

Rising rental yields


HERITAGE buildings in George Town continue to draw investment interest, with renovated shophouses in the heritage core and buffer zones chalking up an increase of 50% to 100% in rental value since last year.
But is all this rush to cash in on tourist dollars resulting in unsafe buildings that do not meet fire safety regulations?
In Penang, a“heritage building” refers to pre-war structure, such as traditional Chinese shophouse, built before 1945, the year World War II ended.
For a long time, the rental yield of old shophouses was rather low, typically fetching a couple of hundred ringgit for residential use and several hundred ringgit for business use.
In George Town, shophouse property can either have residential or commercial status within the same street.
Better yield: Old shophouses like this row along Jalan A.S. Mansoor have greatly appreciated in value in more ways than one.Better yield: Old shophouses like this row along Jalan A.S. Mansoor have greatly appreciated in value in more ways than one.
But in recent years, with the increase in low-cost flights to the island and the influx of tourists — bother domestic and foreign — new investors have been attracted to establish mainly boutique or budget hotels in shophouses.
A check on online property portals reveal that typical shophouse property in the prime commercial areas of George Town are not longer within the RM1,500 to RM2,000 rental range but at least RM3,000 per month.
Tenancy agreement
Previously, we have reported on the steep rise in the value of heritage buildings in George Town due to the new-found demand for property with a bit of history and architectural appeal.
So many to preserve: Lim says there are 5,439 buildings and sites identified and deemed to be of heritage value.So many to preserve: Lim says there are 5,439 buildings and sites identified and deemed to be of heritage value.
And the latest news is that such increases have prompted stakeholders — especially clan and religious associations that own many such properties — to re-evaluate their rental agreements with tenants. One business affected by the rise in property value is the Alpha Utara Gallery established by veteran artist Khoo Sui Hoe, 73. Located in a renovated, pre-war shophouse at Lebuh China, the gallery has been operating there for the past eight years.
“My rent was RM2,000 when I first started here,” explained Khoo, who has been an ardent promoter of art in Penang.
“But with the nature of this business, it will be hard to keep up with any increase.”
However, according to Khoo, he wasn’t even informed of any rent increase.
He was only told that the association wanted to terminate the rent agreement and take possession of the premises. Apparently, others were waiting in the wings. Khoo will move out by the end of September.
Word in the neighbourhood is that such a splendid double-storey shophouse in Lebuh China, near the Kwan Im Teng Temple, can fetch at least RM4,000 a month.
According to an informed source, even RM4,000 is considered reasonable, as there are properties nearby, up for rent at between RM5,000 and RM6,000 monthly.
For instance, a newly-completed triple-storey, shophouse property — spanning three adjoining units — is commanding rent of RM12,000 a month. The tenancy agreement purportedly extends to 25 years and the cost of restoration is being borne by the tenant.
However, not all shophouse property located in George Town can fetch such prices — not yet anyway. The popular areas for new businesses seem to be centred on the heritage core zone and buffer zone where tourists throng.
Love Lane
While Jalan Chulia and Lorong Love (Love Lane) have long been favoured by backpackers in the past, more chic and pricier lodgings and eateries have sprouted within and beyond the inner city neighbourhood.
Even the early “heritage” enterprises such as the Little Shanghai Heritage Row at the junction of Jalan Nagor and Jalan Bawasah have been overshadowed by recent developments closer to the heritage zones.
Typically, many of the old buildings located in areas such as Lebuh Armenian, Jalan Muntri, Lebuh China and Lebuh Pantai (Beach Street), have been converted into trendy cafes, restaurants and art galleries as well as “boutique” or “budget” hotels with a couple of “Homestay” establishments joining the bandwagon.
Even places further afield from the heritage zones such as Jalan Hutton and Jalan Clove Hall have relatively new businesses in heritage buildings.
Within the past year, more tourism-related enterprises have mushroomed, including along Jalan Pintal Tali (Rope Walk), Lebuh Campbell, Lebuh Cintra, Jalan Masjid Kapitan Keling and Lebuh Noordin.And soon to join the ranks will be new business establishments at Lebuh Melayu, Lorong Ikan, Lorong Lumut, Lorong Stewart, Lebuh China and Jalan A.S. Mansoor (Jalan Sekarat).
What has been mentioned, refers mainly to old shophouses converted to lodgings with limited accommodations ranging from five rooms to a dozen or two, depending on how many adjoining shophouses are involved.
St Giles
Incidentally, dwarfing all these little “boutique” developments will be IGB Corp Bhd’s St Giles Hotel being built on five lots facing Traders Hotel along Jalan Magazine, a road parallel to Lebuh Noordin. The 31-storey building will have 576 rooms. It will be managed by Cititel Hotel Management. But St Giles will be marketed at a higher class than Cititel.
Commercial use
Anyway, buying or investing in an old shophouse is one thing. The hassles begin when the owner or stakeholder tries to restore or renovate the property for a business venture. There are so many confusing and conflicting regulations involving regulatory bodies, including the local municipal council, Fire & Rescue Department (Bomba) and even George Town World Heritage Incorporated.
Applying for a permit to restore your property — especially if it is located within the heritage zones (core and buffer) — could take at least eight months to a year. This is despite all the talk about the local authorities’ one-stop approval centre.
If you want to apply for a change of status from residential use to commercial use, the process is long and tedious. Actually, first and foremost, you have to submit all your architectural plans to Bomba for approval. And Bomba’s requirements may not necessarily conform to heritage conservation guidelines.
A property owner on Lebuh Melayu complained that it took him two long years to get the approval to convert his shophouse to a hotel. Apparently, his building and material costs went up three times while waiting. Other property owners who try to do things the right way have complained of illogical requirements.
One property owner was made to build a enormous water storage tank in his shophouse property that took up half his kitchen space. He was also asked to provide parking space in front of his shophouse property along busy Lebuh Campbell, an impossible requirement.
When challenged to show the actual bylaw requiring this, the official concerned could not respond.
Those who have yet to be issued a renovation permit have also complained of harassment when they try to dispose of rubbish from their newly vacated property.
One owner at Jalan Pintal Tali was recently told that clearing rubbish also require a permit!
Bomba
Nevertheless, a visit to Bomba Penang headquarters in Prai revealed that certain property owners of heritage buildings in George Town have not renovated or restored their property to conform to fire safety regulations. This is simply because they did not apply for Bomba’s approval.
According to Bomba Penang director Azmi Tamat, 55, owners wanting to convert their property to commercial use have to abide by the regulations stipulated in the Uniform Building Bylaws 1984 that apply everywhere in the country.
“We understand the situation of property owners, but not all heritage properties can be approved for use as hotels or restaurants,” said Azmi, a veteran of the fire department for the past 35 years.
“We don’t want a situation in which a tourist or anyone is killed in a fire in one of those boutique or budget hotels. We have to adopt preventive measures before such a situation occurs. And the regulations are clearly spelt out under the bylaws,” pointed out the fire chief.
Two exits
He said that any property for hotel use must have two exits — front and back. The maximum distance to the exit is nine metres. And the staircase must face the front entrance. This is contrary to the traditional layout of a shophouse where the staircase faces the back.
Wall and flooring material must be fire retardant or resistant, which means that the floor boards on the upper level have to be underlaid with such a material. Doors have to be fire-rated and must be able to withstand heat and flames for at least one hour.
Azmi explained that during an emergency, local workers may be familiar with the building structure and escape, but a visitor especially a foreigner, may not find a way out. Also, a fire victim could also be easily overcome with smoke.
Architects
Owners of old shophouses should adopt both active and passive measures to prevent fires from occurring or spreading, advised Azmi.
Besides installing smoke, heat and fire detectors as well as a smoke extraction system, hose reels, emergency lights, exit signs and fire extinguishers, the staff of commercial premises must attend a course on emergency response conducted by Bomba. A company representative such as the receptionist, chef or security staff need only attend the three-day class once. The participant is then expected to train his or her own colleagues.
Said Azmi: “We know that operators of hotels in heritage buildings don’t make that much and we sympathise with them, but where lives are at stake, we can’t take chances. Their qualified architects know the requirements and procedures, therefore, they should submit their plans to us to ensure everyone’s safety.”
But like everything else, there is a loophole in the law that allow owners of residential property to operate their “hotel” business. And it is perfectly legal but we shan’t go into that.
And just how many “heritage” buildings and sites are there in George Town?
World heritage
According to George Town World Heritage Incorporated (GTWHI) acting general manager Lim Chooi Ping, 45, there are 5,439 buildings and sites identified and deemed to be of heritage value. These are classified under four categories of importance.
Under Category I, there are 93 properties including buildings, gateways, cemeteries and historical sites. Sixty-nine of the properties are located in the heritage core zone.
Category II has 4,048 properties comprising mainly shophouses. They are evenly distributed within the core and buffer zones.
Under the category of “infill development” there are 585 sites identified as vacant land or temporary structures where “compatible” re-development is permitted. They are mainly located along the waterfront between Lebuh Beach and Pengkalan Weld (Weld Quay).
And under the “replacement” category, there are 713 buildings deemed to be without any significant value where sensitive re-development is permitted.
Thumbs-up
As a private company set up by the Penang State Government, GTWHI has no actual powers to enforce any perceived flouting of rules and regulations. However, the company’s representative sits on the approval board of the local council which vets permit application for restoration or renovation projects, especially those located within the heritage zones. They can give the thumbs-up or thumbs-down should they have any objection.
A town planner by profession, Lim has been seconded from the Municipal Council of Penang Island to head the GTWHI at the end of 2010.
“A copy of all renovation permit applications is extended to us for our comments at the technical review panel. We look for compliance to building guidelines or the strategy or action plan prepared.”
On the apparent contradictions in Bomba’s fire prevention measures and GTWHI’s focus on ensuring compliance to heritage conservation, Lim said if there were conflicting requirements then, “maybe such commercial use is not advised”.
Intrinsic value
For her, the main challenge facing GTWHI was to educate the public especially property owners on the importance of maintaining the building’s inherent character and intrinsic value, especially when renovating.
“We hope they can work with us to enhance the building’s value. We can advise them on where to get the necessary material from suppliers or get technical advice from experts.”
According to Lim, the definition of “heritage value” covers five aspects:
• historical value
• architectural value
• townscape value
• social value
• scientific value (construction technology)
“For shophouses, the only requirement is for the owner to preserve the façade. Internally, the owner can alter or make changes like adding more floor space but subject to compliance to guidelines,” explained Lim.
Special Area Plan
With the restrictions in the proposed Special Area Plan pertaining to the type of commercial activities allowed within certain zones, she pointed out that when it came to food and beverage outlets, there was no blanket ban on western restaurants.
“We want to promote local cuisine but we can still have French or Italian restaurants but not international fast food restaurants like KFC or McDonald’s.”
Lobbying
And the last word on heritage buildings and restoration comes from Penang-born entrepreneur Christopher Ong, well-known for transforming shophouses and other antiquated buildings into boutique “rental units”.
“It is important for buyers in the heritage zone to restore their properties and not just speculate and add nothing to the Unesco World Heritage Site,” pointed out Ong.
“I am lobbying the council to impose regulations to compel (proper) restoration if the property change hands. There has to be responsibility that comes with profitability.”
•Log on to www.starproperty.my for related articles and to check the rental rates and asking prices of Penang property especially in George Town.

首长:失败可能性虽高 仍盼落成槟海底隧道


(北海5日讯)槟首长林冠英指出,尽管有人劝说槟州建海底隧道的失败可能性高,但他认为至少尝试实行,希望这个东南亚第一个海底隧道能落成,相信后代也会感谢选民的勇敢改变。
他周六在北海麦曼珍灵应殿庆祝关圣帝君圣诞千秋晚宴上说,槟州政府倡导宗教信仰自由,乃首个州政府物色非伊斯兰宗教地,给其他宗教发扬各自宗教;而州政府希望物色到的非伊斯兰宗教地集中,包括2依格保留给华裔宗教、1.5依格给兴都教及一依格供天主教。
翁诗杰特别助理翁协文指出,若能把关圣帝君的“义”融入政党,相信大马政治方向会更好。
他说,本身自小受关圣帝君教义熏陶,其爷爷自中国把关圣帝君的香火带至武拉必,父亲和兄长也曾当关圣帝君庙的理事。- 光华

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Penang Forum 5 pass resolution against hillslope projects


GEORGE TOWN: Delegates who attended the Penang Forum 5 dialogue have passed a resolution urging the state government not to approve any hillslope projects here and to improve the mechanism to monitor existing ones.
This resolution was part of an eight-point charter passed after a public dialogue with Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng and state government officials here.
Other resolutions adopted included a call for local authorities to review the new high density policy which allows for a maximum density of 87 units per 0.4 ha.
The group also asked for more public consultation on major housing projects and for the local authorities to constructively hear objections from residents affected by development.
The dialogue organised by a coalition of Penang-based public-interest civil society groups who call themselves the Penang Forum, had attracted a crowd of around 500 yesterday.
The theme this time around, was “A Public Dialogue with the CM: A Vision for an International Liveable City.”
Other suggestions included charging motorists if they choose to enter the inner city areas during peak hours, making the first 100m of reclaimed land mandatory for public areas and creating an integrated water resource management.
Many in the audience had anticipated fireworks at the event due to a host of environmental issues plaguing the state.
Lim looked relieved on stage as the questions posed to him were relatively tame.
Penang Consumer Protection Association president K. Koris highlighted his thoughts on possible congestion following the completion of the Second Penang Bridge in September next year.
“There is no proper traffic dispersal for the bridge's outlet on the island and a bottleneck is going to happen.
“From what I understand, a road widening project will only begin in 2014.”
Lim said he had to “put his hands up and surrender” when it came to transport as it, as well as the second Penang Bridge, were under Federal Government jurisdiction.
Tanjung Bungah Residents Association (TBRA) committee member Annelies Allain spoke about a plot of reclaimed land on a beach-front that residents have come to label as a “sore thumb”.
“Why does it take four years to put a lot number on a pile of rocks and allocate it for public use?” she asked, referring to reports of a planned Tanjung Bungah Coastal Park for the area.
An eight-year-old boy, Calvin Tan stole the show at the end, by proposing for an iconic landmark that he said could better brand the state.
“Penang needs a new landmark to attract tourists.
“Komtar is too old to take a photograph with,” Calvin said, drawing laughter and applause from the audience.
To this, Lim said that plans were in the works for Heritage Square, a 2ha new heritage enclave around the old Sia Boey market. - The Star

Saturday, August 4, 2012

借镜香港为指南 山坡发展全面把关


(槟城3日讯)向山进逼,索地发展,将是槟州未来发展趋势,在人民闻山坡发展色变之时,槟州政府已拟定被指是全国最严厉的槟州山坡地发展指南,被指将更全面性“把关”,使山坡地发展不这么“吓人”,以香港为借镜,在向山进逼时,也能在山坡地取得强稳发展。在2012年槟州山坡地发展指南下,州政府为山坡地发展立下重重关卡,强制发展商遵守。
在拟定中的山坡地发展指南一反先前山坡地发展指南的疏散及模糊指示,作出一些硬规定比如不同等级山坡地有不同的工程师把关,甚至必须聘来独立的稽查工程师(checker),防止任何的工程纰漏情况。
有关指南即由一组州政府委任的小组负责,主席为魏世福博士,小组署理主席拿督林国康特许工程师也是北马工程师协会前会长,他向本报记者指出,新指南并非更为严格(strict),反之却是更详尽阐明,以便山坡发展计划都能按照指南行事。
不动山坡不代表安全
而他认为,山坡发展的高度多少与山坡地的安全性是两码子事,“一般上我们会对山坡发展的见解是,山不可以动,动了就出事。”“事实上,在山坡地上会出现三种可能情况,一是山坡计划依据设计规划开发,二是不依据设计规定发展,三是完全不动山坡地,而最安全的做法是第一项即是照章行事,反之不理设计违反良好施工规定将是最危险行为,不动山地的安全性却是介于两者间。” -

MPPP can reject renewals, says former town planner


GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) can reject the renewals of planning permission for special projects, according to a former town planning department director.
Khoo Boo Soon, a registered urban planner who opted for early retirement in March 2010, said the Penang Island Structure Plan 2020 did not specify that such projects should be given automatic renewals.
He said the term “special project” as indicated in the structure plan was not meant to be used as a prerequisite to grant permission for development above 76m or any other hillslope development.
He said the term was not meant to be an “escape clause” for the state.
“Although certain projects fall under the special project category, the structure plan does not say anything about automatic renewals or automatic approvals,” Khoo told a press conference yesterday.
He said, as the guidelines were very clear, he did not understand why MPPP and state representatives were saying that their hands were tied.
“They are leading the public to believe that they have no powers to disregard what has previously been approved. The fact is, they have every right to reject those renewals.
“They should come out and tell the people the truth,” Khoo said, adding that he was speaking out as he felt the council and the state owed the public an explanation on the hillslope issue.
MPPP president Datuk Patahiyah Ismail said last month that 19 hillslope approvals that exceeded the 76m-height limit could not be rejected based on height as they were classified “special projects”.
Hillslope projects in Penang have come under intense scrutiny in recent months, with various groups staging protests against several of them.
Khoo said the structure plan was initially vague on the definition of special projects but the MPPP and state planners drew up guidelines to define the term in 2009.
The guidelines defined them as major infrastructure or government projects like roads, dams and telecommunication stations. - The Star

Friday, August 3, 2012

PDC’s new plan to attract MNCs: Build and lease

GEORGE TOWN, Aug 3 — As the global economy grows more and more uncertain, the last thing the Penang Development Corporation (PDC) needed was a multinational corporation telling them it was considering moving its operations out of Penang. But that was the situation they found themselves in when Malaysian Automotive Lighting (Alma) told them its plans earlier this year. Alma is the Penang branch of Germanybased AL-Automotive Lighting, a sub-brand of Magneti Marelli, itself a subsidiary of the Fiat Group.
Alma is a key player in the local automotive lighting industry, producing all of Proton’s headlamps and 85 per cent of its cars’ rear lamps, as well as headlamps for Perodua’s Alza and Viva models. Half of the company’s business involves Japanese carmakers such as Suzuki, Honda, Mitsubishi and Mazda.
Alma’s customer base continues to grow, and so has the company. In fact, it has grown too big for Penang. Its present plant in Bayan Lepas which has 960 employees will not be able to cope with the growing global demand. “Our business plan is showing an increase in volume and customers,” said Mario Corsi, managing director of Alma, “and this plant is becoming too small.” And even if business weren’t great for the company, it would still have to move out; its building is actually owned by Bosch, and Bosch said it wanted it back. Alma isn’t the only company looking to grow. Bosch is growing as well.
Then the Fiat Group instructed the company not to buy new land or build its own plant. “Our business is not real estate,” said Corsi.
Alma had to find investors willing to buy land and build a new plant to rent to Alma for the long term. Their options included Thailand, where their Ford customers are based; China, where Automotive Lighting already has one plant and another on the way; and Kuala Lumpur, where it can be closer to Proton and Perodua. Furthermore, Penang labour, according to Corsi, is relatively more expensive compared to China or Thailand. While Alma searched for potential suitors, it was already busy designing the new plant. The move, like it or not, was happening.
The new plant under construction. — Picture courtesy of Penang Development Corporation
And that might have been the end of Alma’s involvement in Penang, if the PDC had not raised its hand and said, “We can do it for you.” And that was how the PDC’s build-and-lease programme was born.
--
The PDC had never done anything like this before. Normally, it sells land to companies. But Alma didn’t want to spend money on land and buildings anymore — it wanted to pour resources into production and R&D.
That’s where build-and-lease came in. It’s a simple idea: the PDC builds the plant according to the client’s specifications, then leases it to the client for a number of years. The client doesn’t have to pay millions for land and a plant (just the rent), and the PDC gets to ensure the client remains in Penang. Everybody wins.
All of this was dependent on the PDC’s own skills and technical knowledge, which the PDC Consultancy (PDCC, a subsidiary of PDC) chairperson Iskandar Basha assures it has plenty of. “The PDC and PDCC have a wealth of knowledge and resources in terms of land and financial ability to cater to the needs of the customer. We can actually build according to the specification of the customer,” he said. “And for this, they are prepared to pay a fair rate, which in turn gives us a very handsome return.”
A “handsome return” may sound a little strange for the PDC, which, as a state agency, rarely ventures into profit-making enterprises, a recent exception being its Bayan Mutiara luxury properties. But Iskandar sees a potentially strong revenue stream in the build-and- lease programme. The PDC can see a good annuity return over the long term, while still holding onto the land. “It gives the PDC a very good return on investment because the rate is packed in such a way that it adjusts to inflation.”
But Iskandar said that profit isn’t why they are doing this. “Profit is a return that we look for in the risk that we are taking. But we are not embarking into this because of profit. We want to facilitate industries to come into Penang in a manner attractive to them.”
A key contributor to the programme’s success, according to Iskandar, was how quickly a deal was done. Discussions with Alma began in February, and an agreement was locked in place the following month. It was the first demonstration of the PDCC’s ability to fast-track and deliver something quickly. As Iskandar said, “Time kills deals.”
Iskandar credits Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, also the chairperson of the PDC, for pushing the agency in this direction. “The PDC had the skills all along,” Iskandar said. “It was at (Lim’s) urging that we began exploring options like this and finding workable solutions. He encouraged us to see how we can work with and facilitate the industries, and at the same time gain something out of it.”
The PDC can indeed stand to profit from this new venture. After the agreement with Alma was announced, several companies expressed an interest in exploring build-and-lease options with the PDC. Motorola has just signed a build-and-lease agreement for its Mobility division worth close to RM100 million in Bayan Lepas. But the PDCC is being very selective about who they work with. It’s not about whether the company is local or multinational, Iskandar explained, noting at the same time that the PDCC’s evaluation criteria are very stringent. Among the factors considered are the market acceptance of the company’s product, the company’s market share, profitability, its long-term R&D investments and its current balance sheet.
Artist’s rendition of the new Alma plant in Batu Kawan. — Picture courtesy of Alma
And while getting the PDCC to build a plant for you based on your own designs is an appealing idea, there are limits to how unique or specialised it can be. While calculating the cost of a project, the PDCC would factor in retrofitting cost, which is the cost of retrofitting the plant so that another company can use it once the lease is up. “If the degree of uniqueness is anything close to about 70- 80 per cent, I think we would stay out.”
If the build-and-lease programme does become a successful revenue generator over the long term, an industrial real estate investment trust (Reit) is on the cards. “The Reit helps unlock value and has some advantages in terms of tax breaks. It also gives us a possibility to improve our liquidity, so that we can use the funds to do more build-and-lease and inject them back into the Reit.”
--
On March 16, Alma and the PDC signed an RM117 million agreement to build an RM70 million facility in Batu Kawan, on Penang’s mainland. Alma will lease the facility for 20 years, with a renewal option for an additional 10. The new plant, scheduled to be ready by the beginning of 2013, is 33 per cent larger than its present facility and will employ 1,200 people. More importantly, Alma gets to stay in Penang.
The real winners, both Iskandar and Corsi say, are the local talent. “Our skills didn’t get created overnight,” said Iskandar. “Here’s an opportunity for us to tap into the expertise and the experience that the PDC has built over the years. And the people who gain are the consulting firms, civil and mechanical engineers, the contractors and the architects.” “We don’t want to lose the expertise of our people here,” said Alma’s Corsi. “A lot of them have 20 years’ experience with us. Our major asset in this company is our people.” Everybody wins. — Penang Monthly
This article is taken from the August 2012 issue of Penang Monthly (www.penangmonthly.com), out now at all good bookshops and newsagents.

Thursday, August 2, 2012

重发拒山坡高楼信件引混淆 芭堤雅致歉


(槟城1日讯)槟岛市政局主席芭堤雅透露,虽然在槟州结构蓝图中,允许“特别计划”在山坡地段进行,但在海拔超过76米或250尺,斜度25度的山坡上,却只能进行有限的发展,以及也必须实施更严厉的监管,以确保有关发展符合遵守州政府所拟定山坡发展指南,并且也必须提呈环境评估报告及获得州策划委员会的批准。
不符环境评估批准条例
她进一步解释,虽然新港一项22层楼高的小山坡发展计划是属于“特别计划”,可是却不符合“特别计划”的定义,即(1)没有获槟州风险地段管理委员会批准地质报告、(2)未持没有地势图报告、(3)没有遵守山坡地段发展指南、(4)发展建议申请不符合环境评估批准的条例。
她说,槟岛市政局于今年7月12日已致函新港山坡发展计划的发展商,通知该局于今年6月19日已否决有关的计划,并列明否决的5大理由,但由于有关信件过于“简单”,没有斜坡进一步的解释,所以已引起一些混淆,以及也造成一些人士的误解。她指出,在这种情况下,该局已取消于7月12日的信件,于今日(8月1日)寄发另一信件予有关的发展商。她强调,该局较早所寄发的信件,并没有任何的错误,只是没有作进一步的解释。
都将接获市局重发信件
她继透露,上述山坡发展计划的发展商及反对者都将接获该局重新寄发的信件。她对于该局较早寄发信件中所使用词句所引起的混淆,深感抱歉。“新港山坡发展计划虽然已被否决,发展商可在30天内向上诉局提出上诉,而如果上诉得直,有关发展计划已遵守一切所规定的条例,发展商在重新提出申请时,我们也将重新处理这项申请。”由于有关发展商已向上诉局提出上诉,所以她不愿对此计划作进一步的置评。她是于周三在一项新闻发布会上,澄清时如此指出。- 光华

张瀚中:避免双重标准 山坡计划喊停是好事


(槟城1日讯)在槟州民政党召开记者会抨击槟州政府选择性批准新港双威城山坡发展计划的当儿,另一边槟岛市局主席芭提雅即公布首长已喊停该计划,槟州民政党宣传局主任张瀚中事后表示,以正面角度看待,喊停是好事!截至截稿时间,由于无法联络上民政党槟州地方政府事务局主任郑两明,张瀚中受询时表示,这项喊停之前并无人知晓,但首长喊停是好事,总不能出现双重标准,槟州结构大蓝图是最终标准,但要避免重犯错误。在较早前的记者会上,郑两明针对新港两项山坡发展计划,抨击槟州政府双重制度,选择性地批准“心头好”发展商。
他说,今年在新港两项违反槟州结构大蓝图规定,即超过海拔250尺(76公尺)或斜度超过25度的双威城及Palmex山坡计划中,却有不一样的“命运”,双威城计划已经获批,但Palmex计划被拒绝。“今年2月21日获批的双威城计划(Lot 14345),将新建14栋高级公寓,分别9至18层楼高,92个三层楼别墅单位,及两个4、5层楼高的俱乐部单位,占地80.9英亩,倾斜度23至35度。”他补充,此计划是基于槟州结构大蓝图中的“特别计划”(Projek Istimewa)被批准,然而“特别计划”是给予特殊的山坡发展计划如公共设施等,绝不是作为商业、住宅等发展。
他说,据槟岛市政局信函了解,只有1栋22层楼公寓的Palmex计划(Lot 14317),是抵触槟州结构大蓝图中DK3及DSU 10 L1政策,基于海拔250尺以上及斜度超过25度,兴建有关房屋及商业计划,以及灾难高风险区,于6月19日被拒。他因而不解,同样违反山坡发展禁令、涉及更大面积的双威城计划竟然获批准,但Palmex计划却被拒绝。他认为这是对民不公平的决定,州政府采用双重制度,若Palmex计划不被批准,双威城计划同样应该被拒绝,不容许歧视性质的制度。
他望州政府别再归咎于前朝政府,他透露,双威城计划发展商是于2009年以非常低的价格买下山坡地,根据2007年所定下的槟州结构大蓝图,当时猫政府就不该批准了。“州政府也不该置之当地居民不理,居民对此发展计划上诉的同时,面对损失及担心,再来,若双威城计划造成灾难发生,谁要承担?我们要求州政府立刻‘收回成命’,取回双威城计划准证。”郑两明是于周二早在民政党总部召开记者会时,如是指出。出席者包括宣传局主任张瀚中、青年团槟州副团长陈嘉亮及秘书曾丽施。- 光华

MPPP has wide powers, says Lakhbir


GEORGE TOWN: The Penang Municipal Council (MPPP) has wide powers to approve, reject, revoke or modify planning permission and building plan applications, said former senior local government employee Datuk Lakhbir Singh Chahl.
He said the Town and Country Planning Act and Street, Drainage and Building Act empowered the council to define uses of land and buildings while also compelling compliance by developers.
“The laws clearly state that the council shall take into consideration matters that in its opinion are ‘expedient or necessary for proper planning’.
“If the proposed development is located in an area where no local plan exists, the owners of the neighbouring lands have a right to object to the application and to state their grounds of objection.
“The local planning authority can even request that the applicant submit a development proposal report with details such as the concept, justification and analysis of social implications,” he said.
Lakhbir started his career as Penang’s Rural District Council secretary in 1968. His last post was as MPPP secretary. He was also director of the first Penang Island Structure Plan Committee.
On June 15, MPPP president Datuk Patahiyah Ismail said there had been no new approval for hillslope development projects on the island since Pakatan Rakyat came into power in 2008.
She said 19 “special projects” were approved after 2008 but the planning permission for these projects were granted in 1996 under the Penang Structure Plan 2007.
She said the developer could renew it annually up to five times.
Lakhbir, who is a lawyer, said an approved planning permission was valid for a year and the council was under “no obligation” to renew the application for an extension of the planning permission if within that time, the development had not commenced in the manner specified.
“The local planning authority is under no compulsion to automatically approve any application for extension or renewal of a plan approved,” he said.
Penang municipal councillor Dr Lim Mah Hui said there should never be any automatic renewal of planning permission that had lapsed.
“The council must review the entire project every time a renewal of the planning permission is applied for,” he said.
Former MPPP councillor Lim Kah Cheng said she would address public grievances in relation to hillslope and high-density development at a dialogue with Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng on Saturday.
The dialogue will be held at the Caring Society Complex from 2pm to 5pm. Admission is free. - The Star