Sunday, November 17, 2013

Business as usual in property market

The anti-speculation measures outlined in Budget 2012 have curbed the activity of ‘flippers’, but their real impact in opening up the housing market has yet to be seen.
TWO years ago, Calvin bought a property in Johor from a developer supposedly priced at RM924,800.
“Supposedly” because the developer had thrown in a massive credit note of RM141,184 as incentive and rebates to “reward” Calvin for his early-bird purchase.
So, the nett price for the property should have been reduced to RM783,616. But because the sales and purchase agreement had the price at RM924,800, taking a 90% percent loan would have given him a neat profit – because the loan would be more than the nett price he was paying for the property.
“If you buy from developers while the property is under construction, it doesn’t require a valuation report so developers can artificially jack up prices like that,” says Calvin’s wife, Priscilla, who works in a bank.
She says it is not uncommon for developers to work hand-in-hand with banks on this because both stand to gain.
Ever been to one of those new project launches only to find infuriatingly that one of the blocks and the choice units have already been snapped up even before the launch?
Malaysia Institute of Estate Agents (MIEA) president Siva Shanker points to the cosy “property investors clubs” as the culprit.
“In these investor clubs, members ‘gang up’ and sometimes buy up the whole block.
“But these people are not end-users. They are speculators. They are like middlemen who take these units from developers without paying anything, then sell them off for a higher price or flip them after two years when the project is completed,” he says somewhat disapprovingly.
He says that often before a launch, developers offer the first bite to these property investor clubs.
“And they can never get enough. They’ll take the whole block and sell the 100 to 200 units to their own members.
“And when the developer launches the project a few days later, he can say Block ‘A’ is already fully sold and bump up the price for Block ‘B’,” he says.
What happens here, he points out, is that the genuine house-buyer ends up paying a higher price, or in some cases being deprived of a chance of buying a unit because it is already sold out even before the launch.
Siva, however, stresses that people should not blame developers.
“The developer is a capitalist. His job is to make money. If he can sell at a higher price, why shouldn’t he?
“Blame the speculators because they are the ones who are driving the market really high,” he adds.
The recent Budget 2014 announced a slew of measures aimed at curbing speculation in the property market, which has been spinning out of control and putting houses, particularly for the lower and middle income groups, beyond their reach.
The measures include a 30% tax (RPGT) on profits, if the property is sold within three years of purchase, 20% in the fourth year, 15% in the fifth year and no tax if it is after the fifth year.
Developers too will no longer be allowed to offer the developers’ bearing interest scheme (DIBS), a scheme which speculators loved and took advantage of, because they did not have to pay interest during the construction period and would only need to start servicing their loan once the house had been completed and handed over, by which time the price of the property would have gone up and they would be able to “flip” it for a profit.
From January, when the new measures come into effect, developers would also need to spell out details in their pricing, including listing down the price of the benefits and incentives offered to buyers such as the exemption of legal fees, stamp duty, sales agreement, cash rebates and ‘free’ gifts such as renovation and all the built-ins.
Another measure is that foreigners would now be allowed to only buy properties that cost RM1mil and above.
Siva says while the primary market (i.e. buying new units from developers) make up only 20% to 25% of total transactions in the market, this is really where the massive speculation is happening and this has been spiralling out of control and creating distortions in the market place.
“The developer is saying there is demand and ‘let us build, build and build’ but they are building only high-end properties
“If one guy goes and buys 20 units from a developer, is that real demand? Is he going to live in these 20 places? Who is going to live in these 20 places?”
“Developers don’t want to build the RM200,000 or RM300,000 units anymore (although these are in high demand) because the profit is less.
“If I was a developer, I would do the same thing. They are in it to make money. And just because they are doing such a fabulous job, selling very well and the market is zooming, you can’t now blame them.”
But Siva has less sympathy for speculators especially those in it for the short term.
He says thanks (or rather no thanks) to the (soon-to-be-prohibited) DIBS, speculators have been buying properties “they don’t need and can’t afford.”
“If you bought a RM1mil property and took a 90% loan of RM900,000 and the developer gave you a 10% rebate which comes up to RM100,000 and picked up the stamp duty, legal fees and absorbed the interest rate during the construction period, you bought that property without taking a sen out of your wallet!”
“That’s scary and dangerous because the only reason you could buy it is because you didn’t have to pay for it in the first place.
“But if they made you pay 20% down payment and pick up the cost of the legal fee, pay the interest for the first two years, you wouldn’t have been able to buy the place and would have therefore stayed away from that purchase.”
For him, the 30% RPGT for the first three years and removing DIBS are smart moves that will reduce speculators to some extent.
People would balk at having to give away 30% of their profit as RPGT, he says, and without the DIBS, buyers would now need to pay the interest on their loan even during the construction period so this would deter speculators who have been having it good for these past few years with no-money-down housing schemes.
In any case, with so many high-end properties in the market these days, Siva questions who the property speculators are hoping to rent their units out to, if they are not able to sell it.
“If the monthly rent is RM7,000, RM8,000, RM9,000, RM10,000 most Malaysians can’t afford this.
“Only the expats can afford this. But the number of expats here has reduced drastically because the economic crisis in Europe had many companies sending their expats back to their home countries. Although things have improved a bit in Europe now, the number of expats coming back here is still not like before.
Siva also wonders about the thousands of units coming up in the Iskandar development region in Johor.
“Are they expecting 30,000 expats to live and rent there? I don’t think so. I feel a lot of these units will be empty.”
He describes as “madness” the rate property prices have been growing in recent years, with prices jumping by RM300,000 in just a matter of two years.
“The growth is too high, too fast and at that pace, the fundamentals can’t hold. And if many people can’t service their loan or sell their property, and if their numbers are in the thousands, then the market can come crashing down.”
So Siva is somewhat pleased that “brakes” are being applied to the property sector to slow it down and stop it from racing out of control.
For him, as long as property is being viewed as a financial instrument, the home owner will lose out to the investor and speculator who has far more resources and insider information to buy before a launch.
“That is why genuine house-buyers are screaming because they are not able to buy a property for themselves which I think is unfair.
“There must be social justice. Everything can’t be about making money and capitalism. What about the person left behind? He is going to suffer more and more.”
It is too early to say if the stringent measures announced in Budget 2014 three weeks ago will affect the property market.
But Siva says it has already affected market sentiment.
“There is virtually no activity in the market because everybody has a knee jerk reaction but this is only to be expected in Malaysia.
“Every time there’s an announcement, there is a huge knee jerk reaction and people panic and act like their mother died.
“Nobody buys and sells anything, then after three or four months, people forget, then slowly a semblance of order returns and life gets back to normal.”
Which is what he expects to happen with the property market this time. He does not think the curbs introduced are going to bring down prices.
“I don’t have a crystal ball but I don’t think prices will go up either. I think prices will consolidate for the next three quarters, then we should recover in 2015 and start moving along to another high in 2016.”
So what is his advice to wannabe home buyers?
Barring a serious mishap or global economic downturn, he doesn’t see property prices coming down, he says.
“Nothing is going to be cheaper than it is today – not sugar, not petrol, not underwear! It is the same with property.
“Land prices, cement prices and labour costs are going to be more expensive. So if you want to buy a property, now is as good a time as any.”
He says if the buyers can’t afford units at the present price, they should consider buying a property a little further away or a smaller unit, then upgrade later in life.
Secondary market
One of the things worth considering, he says, is to buy from the secondary market (which means not buying a brand new property but buying existing properties from those who want to sell).
Buying from the secondary market, he believes, can sometimes save a person 30% to 40% of what it would cost if that person had bought a new property within the same area.
Citing as example, one of the latest condominium projects in Bangsar which is selling at RM1,500 per sq ft. But there are older development projects there that one can still buy in the secondary market for RM600 to RM1,000 per sq ft.
“All the speculation is in the primary market, so you can get a good property in the secondary market for cheaper. You just have to put in more effort and look out for them,” he says.
And what is his advice to flippers who are now ‘stuck’ because of the new measures?
“To those who bought based on greed and ‘kiasu’-ism based on the advice of so-called property gurus whose credentials are suspect, I am sad for you but you walked into this.
“So if now you can’t afford and really need to sell, don’t be greedy and put such a high price on the property that makes no one want to buy it.
“Bring the price down if you can and try to sell it as fast as you can so that you don’t get into the trap of not paying your banking loan and falling into a non-performing loan situation.
“Your greed is what got you there in the first place. Don’t let that greed propel you further into darkness.”
But if the speculator chooses to look for a tenant instead to subsidise the mortgage payment, Siva says, he should be realistic.
“Stop listening to the advice of your so-called property guru who advised you three years ago that you can get more than your mortgage on rent because sometimes you can’t.
“So if your monthly mortgage payment is RM3,500 and you want a rental of RM3,500 and are stubbornly waiting, you should stop now. It is better to accept a lower rental because the alternative is zero.” - The Star

Market forces will decide property prices

HAVE developers become too greedy?” Ask this question to Real Estate and Housing Development Association (Rehda) president Datuk Seri Michael Yam and there is a momentary pause on the other side of the line.
Then just as quickly, Yam springs to the defence of developers, insisting that this is just perception and not at all true.
“It is because property affects every facet of people’s lives that it becomes so sensitive and almost a political issue.”
He points out that developers have over the years delivered more than four million housing units including a huge number of subsidised units.
“Ninety-five per cent do a proper job, so it’s not fair to call us greedy,” he says.
Yam says property prices are based on supply and demand, and that prices will be kept at an equilibrium when the supply in the market meets the demand.
“When there is an oversupply, people will stop buying and the less efficient developers will be forced out of business.”
He stresses that developers have had a lot of conditions and requirements imposed on them in the past, like building low-cost housing, offering bumiputra subsidy for housing, building community centres and other approvals, which all adds to the cost.
“If people claim developers make a lot of profit, don’t forget a number of developers are SMEs. Those who develop Kelantan, Terengganu and Johor – ask them if it is very profitable,” he says.
Even for the public-listed property companies, he points out that their profit margins are usually less than 20%.
“If they make more than 20% to 25%, then it’s usually from the sale of parcel of land and they realise the profit from that year,” he says.
Yam says the property sector is no more different than those in manufacturing or trading but points out that the top public-listed companies that made billions are in fact not property companies but those in banking, plantation, trading and services.
He admits that the stringent measures announced in Budget 2014 to curb property speculation took the industry by shock because the quantum of the real property gains tax (RPGT) was even higher than the rates imposed before April 1, 2007, which were already deemed to be high at that time.
“We expected a revision of RPGT upwards but not by this quantum.”
On the RM1mil minimum for foreigners to buy property in Malaysia, Yam says Malaysia has never been a spot for property speculation by foreigners in the past because the appreciation had been too slow compared to its neighbouring countries.
“But property prices in Hong Kong and Singapore have gone to dizzying heights to the detriment of their citizens, and so these countries are doing some serious curbing. So what Malaysia has done (with regard to purchases by foreigners) is a pre-emptive move because knowing that all the other doors are closed, you don’t want the horse to bolt.”
Still, he notes that foreign property ownership in Malaysia is only 5.5% of the whole housing stock which is really not a significant percentage.
“If Malaysia was such a fertile ground, foreigners would have bought it up.
“You must remember that investors do not just buy because land or property is cheap. it’s about the whole packaging. It’s about crime, security, lifestyle, quality of living etc. The most expensive places are Hong Kong, Singapore and London and people are still rushing to buy there. So let’s not look at things in isolation,” he adds.
With the stringent measures in place in January, he says, developers will now need to be creative and find “various marketing mechanisms” to survive.
He concedes too that consumers should also be enlighted and educated with regards to purchasing property.
“But people are not idiots. They know what they are buying.” - The Star

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Increase transparency in prices

Companies factor in freebies into the cost of the property
DEVELOPERS often offer sales gimmicks and marketing ploys like free legal fees, rebates, air-conditioners and furniture. Budget 2014, however, seems to make it a requirement that developers be transparent about their property prices.
The adage “There’s no such thing as a free lunch” rings true in this instance. While developers are quick to advertise various blandishments such as “free legal fees/stamp duty, etc”, such freebies are always factored into the property price. These freebies should be translated into cash incentives to be deducted from the purchase price of the property, as otherwise, it becomes meaningless to offer these gimmicks, which are usually recovered in the form of substandard materials. Here, we again thank our Prime Minister for announcing that developers, when offering their products, should disclose the value of the freebies to the buyers. Such transparency is a move in the right direction so that buyers would know what they are letting themselves in for. The enforcers of the law should be able to count on the Urban Wellbeing,
Housing and Local Government ministry to do its job to ensure that there is strict compliance and observance.
Whilst such a requirement will not deter speculation, it will hopefully educate house buyers on what makes up their final property price and not to be misled by developers advertising such freebies.
Additional measures
The National House Buyers Association (HBA) reiterates its call on the Government to take additional measures to stem the steep rise in property prices. There are basically two ways to reduce speculation: increasing the entry cost and increasing the exit cost.
Whilst Budget 2014 has increased the exit cost in the form of the higher real property gains tax or RPGT, more measures are needed to increase the entry cost to further reduce speculation.
The current stamp duty payable for the transfer of properties is based on the value of the property. This does not deter speculators, as the stamp duty payable is the same, regardless of the number of properties already held or bought.
The Government’s current low stamp duty regime has been misused by property speculators to accumulate multiple properties, driving up these prices by creating false demand and denying genuine buyers the opportunity to buy such properties.
It is every Malaysian’s wish to buy at least one property in their lifetime for their own dwelling, and perhaps an additional piece of property as a long-term investment or to fund their children’s education. Hence,
HBA has proposed that the current scale stamp duty remains the same for the first two properties bought, but is increased to a flat rate based
on the property price for the third and subsequent properties to discourage speculative buying.
(See table for a comparison between the current stamp duty and the stamp duty proposed by HBA.)
With the same scaled stamp duty payable regardless of the previous number of properties held, speculators are not deterred from buying multiple properties.
Even for properties costing RM600,000, the stamp duty payable is only 2% of the value of the property.
The HBA-proposed stamp duty would not cause any disruption to genuine house buyers who can only afford two properties in their lifetime (one for their dwelling and one for long-term investment).
On the other hand, property speculators would be discouraged as the stamp duty greatly increases their entry cost.
RPGT will not lead to higher property prices
Certain parties with vested interest are claiming that the revised RPGT rate would lead to higher property prices, as speculators would definitely factor in the RPGT into their property prices, only for the subsequent buyer to end up paying the RPGT indirectly.
Such statements only confirm that speculators are indeed responsible for driving up property prices.
If indeed the speculators factor in the additional 20% to 30% RPGT into their property prices, then it would make the property prices unattractive to the next buyer.
Financial Institutions may be unwilling to finance such exorbitantly overpriced properties, as such institutions have their own market intelligence to determine the fair value of such properties.
RPGT will lead to an orderly property sector
The aspiration of every rakyat is to own a roof over their heads and shelter their young rather than making money from properties. Hence, having the RPGT in place would deter speculators, and eventually lead to a more orderly property sector driven by market demand and not speculative forces.
Therefore, HBA supports the Government’s RPGT proposal and urges the public to support such a move to curb the current excessive speculation in the property sector.
HBA strongly believes that the cost of a roof over one’s head should not be left to market forces. The repercussions whereby a large section of society is deprived of affordable housing is serious and far-reaching. The present property price increase does not commensurate with the present rise in wages. The affordability of house ownership is becoming an elusive dream to the present generation. Controlling the upward spiral of property costs is not in the interest of housing developers. In fact, they certainly favour it. Therefore, it would be totally unrealistic to expect any developer to be interested in bringing down property prices.
CHANG KIM LOONG is the honorary secretary-general of the National House Buyers Association (www.hba.org.my), a non-profit, non-governmental organisation (NGO) manned by volunteers. He is also an NGO councillor at theSubang Jaya Municipal Council. - The Star

Friday, November 15, 2013

发展齐来也路可负担房屋 Zubicon公司得标

槟岛西南区14日讯)槟州政府通过公开招标,委任Zubicon有限公司成为S.P.齐来也路可负担房屋发展计划的发展商。
槟州首长林冠英今日见证槟州发展机构和槟岛市政局与该公司签署联合发展合约,计划在S.P.齐来也路的11.04英亩地段上,兴建1900个廉价和中廉价房屋单位。
有关合约阐明,该项发展计划必须在4年內完成,并在2017年全面建竣。
该项计划的1900个单位中,包括:
883个单位(每单位最低面积800平方尺,最高售价20万令吉)
770个单位(每单位最低面积700平方尺,最高售价7万2500令吉)
165个单位(每单位最低面积900平方尺,最高售价30万令吉)
82个单位(每单位最低面积1000平方尺,最高售价40万令吉)。- 

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Pay some premium and it’s done, owners of leasehold properties told

GEORGE TOWN: The state government has no objection to renewing the leasehold land status of residential owners, including the 465 households in Bukit Gelugor.
Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng (pic) said houseowners only need to pay the difference in terms of premiums to extend the lease.
“There is no problem for houseowners who wish to extend their lease for another 99 years.
“They can just submit their application to the land office. For the record, we have actually renewed some of the leases,” he said.
Lim, however, said the conversion of leasehold to freehold status was a different story.
“Under the National Land Code and the Federal Constitution, we have to get permission from the National Land Council before we can award freehold status to leasehold land owners.
“The National Land Council, however, did not agree to the state government’s application to give freehold status to owners of residential properties.
“Nevertheless, we are still trying. The problem is that the National Land Council meets only once a year.
“We will still try our luck during the meeting to be held either this month or the beginning of next month,” he told a press conference at his office in Komtar yesterday.
Lim was responding to the 465 households in Bukit Gelugor who wanted the state government to help them renew their leasehold land status which will expire in 2052.
Penang Bukit Gelugor Residents Association vice-president M. Ganesh had said they were uncertain about the state policy on the matter. - The Star
Lim said they had explained the situation to the Bukit Gelugor houseowners many times, including once before the last general election.
He also said the state government adopted a people-centric policy, under which houseowners with expired leasehold land status in new villages, traditional villages and estates get to enjoy 90% discount in premiums for their lease renewal.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Penang Real Estate | Penang Property | Penang Properties: Reflections Condominium Wanted Urgently

We are looking for Reflections Condominium to buy, therefore serious sellers, kindly contact us asap.

For more information, kindly click the following link:-

Penang Real Estate | Penang Property | Penang Properties: Reflections Condominium Wanted Urgently

To contact us, Penang I Property, please click here.

Penang Real Estate | Penang Property | Penang Properties: Surin Condominium Wanted

We are looking for Surin Condominium to buy, therefore serious sellers, kindly contact us asap.

For more information, kindly click the following link:-

Penang Real Estate | Penang Property | Penang Properties: Surin Condominium Wanted

To contact us, Penang I Property, please click here.

张宝发:槟产业市场处巩固期 交易量降 价值保持

(槟城12日讯)马来西亚亨利行(Henry Butcher)槟城分行董事张宝发博士透露,自2011年开始,槟城产业交易量已逐渐下降,但这是一种健全的现象,因为任何市场到达顶点时,都会回跌。
他认为,槟城产业市场目前是处于巩固期,虽然产业交易量下降,但在产业价值上升下,成交的价值仍然保持。
他举例,以单位计算,于2012年,槟城产业交易量为1万5891单位,于2013年则只是1万1550单位,下降大约27.3%,而于令吉款额计算,2012年的交易量为60亿9425万令吉,2013年则56亿3528万令吉,下跌只有7.53%。
他是于该公司槟城办事处2014年财政预算案圆桌讨论会过后,受到记者询问时,如此指出。受邀参与该讨论会的尚包括马来西亚房地产商会槟城分会主席拿督陈福星,丰隆银行个人金融服务高级分行经理刘铠樑,比马威特许会计行股东黄国成及米雪儿等。
陈福星认为,槟州政府建议于明年实施征收额外3%产业交易价税款,不足以阻止外国人在房地产的投机,因为如果大量类似活动,仍然会造成冲击,屋价将继续上涨。
黄国成建议只对售屋者,而并非购买者征收有关的税款,以阻止外国人的投机活动,因为槟州政府不应阻止外国人前来购买产业。- 

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Restoring stability in the market

WITH a number of Asian countries bracing for a potentially devastating asset bubble burst, Malaysia is also rolling up its sleeves if the Budget 2014 measures were to offer a glimpse of the Government’s foresights.
The measures are meant to deter speculators and promote a more stable market that is driven by real demand. Although generally applauded by various stakeholders for its noble intentions, there are also some apprehension as to the measures’ potential impact on the property market.
Real Estate and Housing Developers’ Association president Datuk Seri Michael Yam says while the measures are meant to curb speculation, they may also dampen the market as a result of slower velocity of transaction, even though prices are not expected to fall but to remain flattish.
Yam says in the medium to longer term, the short-term knee-jerk reaction to delay decision to purchase may lead to an acute spike in demand, if supply does not keep in step. “However, those in the mass market should be less concern about this possible scenario as the Government’s strategy and incentive to supply affordable housing would ensure that those who cannot afford premium propertywould not be impacted,” he explains.
He says while the higher RPGT rate would discourage speculative activities, its potential effect will be rather limited, since only RM18bil (assuming 10% of this is speculation or only RM1.8bil or less than 3% of the RM68bil market) is in the total new residential sales market in 2012.
“It will impact the secondary market more. Recent owners and future buyers are expected to hold onto their property beyond the five-year period, thus reducing the availability of stock in the secondary market which accounts for 70% of the total value of residential transaction in 2012.
“Less supply with no change at best, or at worse increase in demand leading to further price increase. Likewise, if intending purchasers can’t buy old property, they will turn their attention to the primary market, thus increasing demand for new properties,” he points out.
Association of ValuersProperty Managers, Estate Agents and PropertyConsultants in the Private Sector, Malaysia (PEPS) president Lim Lian Hongbelieves the measures would be able to prevent people from over-committing themselves and driving prices up to astronomical heights.
“It will immediately curtail flippers of both commercial and residential property. As such, the measures will be able to put sanity back into the property market and prevent a property bubble where prices have risen beyond the reach of the masses and the income level of the population,” Lim says.
Lim, however, stresses that the effectiveness of the measures will “really depend on the liquidity situation”.
“Loan availability, employment and income factors are paramount in determiningproperty prices. It’s money that drives up property prices. It’s such an obvious statement but the availability of money is a factor of employment, banking policies as well as fiscal policies on lending. So, effective or not, it is in the control of money supply by the government and ultimately the central bank,” Lim concedes.
Managing director of property consultancy Khong & Jaafar Sdn Bhd Elvin Fernandez says with the budget measures all excessive speculation is expected to subdue fairly substantially.
The property market as a whole will move closer to its basic fundamental relationship with household incomes and long-term rental returns (for residential properties), and long-term rental returns and returns from business operations for commercial and industrial properties.
Fernandez does not expect prices of residential properties to rise in the near term as the slew of measures take effect.
CB Richard Ellis (Malaysia) group executive director Paul Khong concurs that the two measures will “surely curb speculation in the local market”.
Khong says the reinstatement of the full RPGT will obviously impact all types of properties as it was designed to curb speculation.
Investors and house buyers will now take this tax into consideration before making any purchase decisions.
“The measures will control the sharp rise of all segments of the markets. The dismantling of DIBS is an immediate measure to curb new investors from the cash-flow angle, while the RPGT affects investors’ decisions in terms of his investment tenure.
“The higher tax will cut off short-term players looking for attractive capital gains.”
Nipping the bud
However, with the escalating cost of development land and construction materials, there will still be pressure on house prices to move northwards, albeit on a slightly lesser degree, Khong concedes.
He says the categories of buyers called “the flippers” who are forced to sell down by year-end may flood the market with properties which they need to off load to escape the RPGT.
“The property market will stabilise further and many existing speculators will be looking to exit the market by year-end or be subject to 30% RPGT next January.”
He says while property prices will be affected slightly, there will not be a substantial drop as the difference between the current and the latest RPGT rates is just about 15% of the net gain.
“Investors will not loose any money due directly to this measure but will merely gain slightly less.”
The higher RPGT levied on foreigners will hit those who are in the market for short-term gains, and they may now look for a quick exit by year-end or be subject to the new rates come 2014.
Khong believes property prices will stay flattish for the next six months to a year, and that many investors will defer their decision to purchase until they come to accept the new changes.
The medium and high-end condos will be affected; with many speculators and short-term investors likely to reconsider their options. Some may just stay away.
Khong says the higher price bar for foreign buyers of RM1mil will impact the mid-level segments of the residential market and not the luxury end products.
“In the Klang Valley, most of the residential properties are already moving above the RM1mil mark. A two-storey terrace house in Sri Hartamas costs RM1.5mil now.”
He says new projectssuch as studio or one-bedroom apartments which are about to be launched priced below RM1mil will be impacted.
“However, it may not be substantial as the majority of the local residential projects usually have less than 30% foreign buyers. Projects affected would largely be in the Klang Valley, Penang and Iskandar, locations which are popular among foreign investors,” he says.
Meanwhile, National House Buyers Association (HBA) honorary secretary-generalChang Kim Loong opines that while the higher tax on profits will cut investors’ profits when they exit the market, the entry cost side has not been addressed.
He says the best way to control the entry cost to deter speculation is a review on the stamp duty payable for the transfer of property.
The present stamp duty payable does not deter speculators as the rate imposed is the same regardless of the number of properties already held or bought.
“The low stamp duty regime has been misused by speculators to accumulate multiple properties, driving up these prices by creating false demand and denying genuine buyers the opportunity to buy such properties.”
To nip speculative tendencies, he urges for a higher flat rate to be imposed on the third and subsequent properties, although the current scale can still be used on the first two properties.
Allaying market concerns, Chang says: “The HBA-proposed stamp duty would not cause any disruption to genuine house buyers who can only afford to buy two properties in their lifetime (one for own stay and one for long-term investment). On the other hand, property speculators would be discouraged as the stamp duty will greatly increase their entry cost,” Chang explains.
According to Rehda’s Yam, the higher-end premium segment of the housing market and large built-up apartments bought for investment may be most affected by the measures. Commercial strata offices which are bought by investors for recurring rental income may also see a lull.
Property in highly sought after addresses and landed housing are not expected to be affected although the rate of price increase is likely to be at a slower pace. - The Star

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Shanghai tightens housing rules

BEIJING: Shanghai will raise the minimum down payment for second-home purchases to 70% from 60% in a bid to calm surging home prices, according to the city’s housing bureau, following similar moves by other big cities in China.
Home prices in large Chinese cities have set records, despite a four-year long government campaign to cool the property market, raising concerns over a potential price bubble and even social unrest as housing becomes increasingly unaffordable for many people.
Shanghai is the third city to implement a minimum down payment for second-home buyers of as high as 70%, and its move comes after Shenzhen and Beijing tightened measures in recent months.
“We will continue to improve the systems of the property market and affordable housing to effectively curb excessively fast property price rises,” the bureau said in a statement on its website. www.shfg.gov.cn. More cities are expected to follow suit.
“Guangzhou should be the next to move,” said Liu Yuan, a head of research at property consultancy Centaline.
In Shanghai, where houses are among the most expensive in China, home prices rose 17% in September from a year ago. Guangzhou’s prices jumped 20% and Beijing prices rose 16% in the month, both record growth rates.
China property shares extended losses yesterday after the announcement. Poly Real Estate ended down 1.1% in Shanghai, while Country Garden sank 3% andChina Resources Land was down 1.6% in Hong Kong.
Property shares have been roiled by uncertainty ahead of the Communist Party’s Third Plenum from today to Monday, which will see some of China’s top leaders gather behind closed doors to set the economic agenda for the next decade. Investors are waiting to see if any controls on the market will be announced after the meeting.
Also under the new Shanghai rules, migrant families in the city without residence permits must have paid their monthly social security fees or income tax for two years before they are qualified to buy a first home in the city. Previously they only needed to pay the fees for one year.
The housing bureau would increase the land supply for residential homes and study ways to lower the threshold for affordable housing applicants next year to allow more people to be covered by public housing, it added. – Reuters