Saturday, July 21, 2012

Teng furnishes proof 16-storey block of flats planned for site


NIBONG TEBAL: Penang Barisan Nasional has claimed that it has evidence to prove that the previous state administration had made provision for public housing on the 0.4ha land in Taman Manggis, George Town.
State Barisan chief Teng Chang Yeow showed the media a copy of a 2003 internal memo which was said to have been written by the then director of Housing and Local Government of the State Secretary’s office to the then State Secretary.
He said the memo stated that two blocks of affordable housing units had been originally planned to be built on a 1.97ha (4.93 acre) plot of land at the junction of Jalan Zainal Abidin-Lorong Selamat.
“However, based on a standardised plan that was similarly adopted by the Federal Government, only one 18-storey block of flats could be built then, while the remaining plot of land was to be kept for future development.
“And, according to the architect concerned, a 16-storey additional block could be built on the remaining piece of land,” he told reporters at former Bukit Tambun assemblyman Lai Chew Hock’s office in Lorong Bukit Tambun, Simpang Ampat, here yesterday.
Teng said the Housing Committee in the state executive council back then had further discussed the matter on April 29, 2003 and June 24, 2003, where it agreed that a block of flats under the People’s Housing Project (PPR) with rental should ideally be developed there.
On Thursday, Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng claimed that the previous state administration had not made any provision for public housing to be built on the 0.4ha plot of land in Taman Manggis.
Lim had refuted as “completely untrue” an earlier statement by Teng that the original plans under Barisan Nasional’s administration were for a community housing project on the prime land.
Teng said he also ran an online search with the Penang Municipal Council’s One-Stop Centre and found that the council had received a planning permission application for the construction of a 30-storey building on Lots 305, 306, 313 and 314 at the site.
“So, my original statement is true and I stand by it.
“But, my question back to the state government (now) is whether it is prepared to scrap the 30-storey building and build affordable houses there instead?”
He said the Chief Minister had been quoted in newspaper reports as saying that the particular piece of land had been identified for the construction of a private hospital with 150 car parking lots.
Teng said Lim should make it clear whether the proposed 30-storey building was for the private hospital that he had mentioned.
“There is a proposal submitted for planning permission and they (seem to) claim ignorance. That is why I (had) said don’t twist the facts. If the MPPP president has failed in her duties to inform the state and has probably caused the state to mislead people, she should then be demoted,” he said.
Teng queried that if the particular piece of land could accommodate the proposed 30-storey building, then how could it not be suitable for a 16-storey block of affordable homes? - The Star

State blacklist forced us to sell land, say Umno duo


GEORGE TOWN: Two state Umno leaders, accused of profiting from a land sale, have claimed that they were forced to sell off the land because their company could not get development approval from the DAP-led Penang government.
In denying allegations that their company sold the 4ha land in Balik Pulau within four months for a profit of RM5mil, Bukit Gelugor Umno division head Datuk Omar Faudzar said:
“We were forced to sell the land as our company (Aseania Group of Companies) was blacklisted.
“Every development project must go through the state planning committee chairman Lim Guan Eng. For instance, when we submitted a plan to build semi-detached houses in Bandar Perda in 2011, we were told to pay RM516,000 premium and to build affordable housing,” he claimed in a press conference at the Barisan Nasional new office in Jalan Datuk Keramat here yesterday.
Omar admitted that the land in Kampung Terang was purchased at RM22 per sq ft in October 2010 and sold to a property developer at RM33 per sq ft on Jan 10 this year.
“The land transaction did not take four months as alleged by state PKR vice-chairman Datuk Abdul Halim Hussein. Besides, we were forced to sell the land as our company was blacklisted,” said Omar.
He claimed that three other companies — UDA Holdings Bhd (UDA), JKP Sdn Bhd and Penang Regional Development Authority — were also blacklisted.
“For the past eight years, we have contributed by building 2,033 low-cost and low medium-cost units in Balik Pulau priced between RM25,000 and RM55,000,” he said.
Also present at the press conference was state Umno deputy chairman Datuk Musa Sheikh Fadzir.
Musa, who was named as the other Umno leader, challenged Abdul Halim to speak up against the development of an international school on a 2.4ha site and Asian Women Leadership University (AWLU) on 40ha in Balik Pulau.
Both Umno leaders are shareholders of Maison Height Sdn Bhd, a subsidiary of Aseania which Abdul Halim claimed had sold the land for RM13.5mil to a third party developer in May within four months, raking in RM5mil.
He alleged that the two bought the land from 31 Balik Pulau residents for RM8.5mil in Jan this year. - The Star

Rep: Riverbank settlers need to move for anti-flood works


THE flooding woes in the Sungai Pinang area in Penang will not end until all the residents living on the river’s banks have been resettl-ed to make way for Phase Two of the flood mitigation project there.
Datuk Keramat assemblyman Jagdeep Singh Deo urged the remaining 30% of the 204 affected residents living in 101 structures along the banks of the Sungai Pinang, to vacate their homes.
“We are seeking the co-operation of these residents to come forward and have talks with the Drainage and Irrigation Department (JPS) on compensation.
“The project can only begin once all the residents have been resettled.
“This is the only way to resolve the flooding woes in the area once and for all,” he told a press conference at the site near Sungai Pinang recently.
He added that he hoped the project, which would take at least a year to complete, could start by the end of the year.
The project costing RM150mil is listed under the 10th Malaysia Plan.
It involves the widening and deepening of the river from Kampung Rawa to the Dhoby Ghaut bridge to help alleviate flooding in the surrounding areas.
Jagdeep Singh was earlier quoted as saying that he would shave his head if floods still happened in Sungai Pinang once the mitigation project was completed.
He said that so far, 70% of the residents living along the banks had agreed to the compensation deals.
Jagdeep Singh was commenting on flash floods which affected several low-lying areas recently.
He added that he had urged officers from the district office and JPS to clear the rubbish traps placed along the river more often.
“I was told that the JPS only comes once a month (to clear the traps). This is not enough.
“They have to come more often, at least once a week, as the water level will certainly rise whenever there are heavy rains.
“This will cause flash floods in the area,” he said. - The Star

被槟议长指当“中介”卖马来地 巫统2领袖反驳指民联不专业


槟城20日讯)针对槟州议长拿督阿都哈林揭露巫统领袖当“中介”卖马来地,豪赚500万令吉的指责,巫统槟州署理主席拿督慕沙及武吉牛汝莪区会主席拿督奥玛弗沙反驳,指自己的发展公司在槟州民联政府不公平的对待下,无法进行房屋计划才被迫转卖土地。
指民联建屋条件苛刻
也是槟州国阵竞选主任奥玛弗沙周五召开记者会澄清,他任职总经理的发展公司Asenia Group在2年前以每平方尺21令吉向31户马来甘榜的居民购买土地,欲发展该地段建造房屋计划却遭不公平对待,被州政府提出苛刻条件,要求付逾51万令吉的高额附加地价(premium tambahan),因此迫于无奈之下才转卖。他当时了解自己公司被州政府列为黑名单,才被要求苛刻的条件,而且只有他的公司被这样对待,因为除了他之外,慕沙也是该公司的主席,两人热衷政治活动,属槟州政府敌对阵营,因此成为“政治受害者”。他斥林冠英不专业,应该公平对待每个槟州人民,无论对方是哪个政党人士。
难承担银行利息卖地
他补充,该公司最后唯有以每平方尺33令吉出售有关土地,因该地段是贷款买下,公司无法承担庞大的银行利息。他反驳阿都哈林指提高价格转售,导致槟岛房价上涨的原因。他解释,他公司曾以每平方尺42令吉在白云山购买地段,建造130单位的廉价屋,价钱只介于2万5000及5万5000令吉,因此每平方尺33令吉依然可建造廉价屋,不会导致房价上涨。
他指这只是阿都哈林为了成为浮罗山背的候选人的政治把戏,马来人不会因此被骗,因为对方提出的都不是事实。慕沙斥阿都哈林不用透过欺骗浮罗山背巫裔获取支持,反之应在浮罗山背建更多廉价屋,因为当地房价动不动就上百万令吉。他指自己身为商人,有人要卖土地价钱合理当然可以接受,加上当时并没反对声,反之州政府欲在浮罗山背一块6英亩的土地建国际大学而驱赶人民,人民反对却不见阿都哈林出来为人民伸冤,他挑战阿都哈林若有本事应阻止政府,不然就只是槟州首长林冠英的“奴隶”而已。- 光华

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Cloudy outlook for Malaysia, says ADB


KUALA LUMPUR (July 18): Weakness in the global outlook clouds Malaysia’s prospects given the country’s close integration with the world economy, according to the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
In its revised Asian Development Outlook (ADO) 2012 released last week, the ADB said growth in Malaysia is moderating to about 4% in 2012, then quickening to 5% in 2013 as the external environment improves and domestic demand will again play its role to anchor growth in the region.
“Private consumption will have to depend on the government’s plan in 2012 to raise wages for the public sector and also for their one-time offer of cash payment to the low- and middle-income groups which constitute 53% of all households in Malaysia,” ADB said.
It added that the labour market is likely to soften this year, particularly in the trade-exposed industries. Job vacancies in January 2012 declined steeply from a year ago. Consumer sentiment weakened late last year.
Private investment in export-oriented industries such as electrical and electronics products will be subdued by the weak global outlook this year, although investment will likely be relatively buoyant in industries that depend on domestic demand. The ADB said the government is pressing ahead with its Economic Transformation Programme launched in 2010 and will proceed all the way to 2020.
“This US$58 billion (RM183 billion) programme was introduced for development of higher value-added industries and infrastructure in partnership with private investors.
“Included in this programme are construction projects such as the US$11.5 billion mass rapid transit rail system in Kuala Lumpur, the redevelopment of the Sungai Besi military airbase and a large site near the centre of the capital for residential and commercial purposes,” it said.
The ADB said the production sector will play a role in driving growth in 2012. “The government has eased some restrictions on foreign investments in 17 services subsectors such as accounting, education, legal and medical services, following a similar move for 27 subsectors back in 2009.
“Inflation rate will most likely recede to 2.4% because of the moderation of domestic demand coupled with the lower prices of imported commodities,” the ADB said.
The ringgit appreciated by 3.4% against the US dollar in the first quarter of 2012 and this helped to dampen inflation which is predicted to pick up to 2.8% in 2013. The ADB said Malaysia’s exports of merchandise will most likely drop this year due to torpid global trade and softer price of export commodities such as palm oil. Imports will increase at a modest rate with forecasts of substantial surpluses, it said.
“Subsidies for fuel, staple foods, electricity, health and education rose from 1.3% of total government spending in 1990 to 14.3% in 2011, which is about 4% of the GDP.
“Subsidies reduce inflation but raise fiscal deficit, reduce budget funding for social and economic development, and distort resource allocation,” the ADB said. It said developing Asia will expand by 6.6% this year and 7.1% next year, lower than the 6.9% and 7.3% forecasts in ADB’s ADO published in April.
This article appeared in The Edge Financial Daily on July 18, 2012.

Singapore housing market needs more certainty — Conrad Raj


JULY 19 — Singapore National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan’s comments in Parliament on the state of the property market illustrate the conundrum of viewing a glass of water as being half full or half empty.
Noting that residential property prices have moderated in recent months, he said the various measures to cool the market “have helped buyers, including those at the middle and low end of the market”. 
Growth in mass market private housing prices outside of the central region slowed to 0.4 per cent in the second quarter of the year compared with 1.1 per cent in the previous quarter, while overall private home prices moved up just 0.3 per cent in the first six months of the year compared with 6 per cent a year ago.
And there is a warning more measures might be introduced if the situation requires.
“These are positive signs that the market is moving towards a stable and more sustainable path. We continue to monitor the market closely, and remain ready to revise and enhance the policy, if and when the situation demands it,” Khaw said.
What exactly is the ministry monitoring, and what are its targets or goals? 
It is also good to see that short-term property speculation has fallen sharply, as indicated by the relatively low volume of sub-sales. But the fact remains that home prices have not come down — they are still at historical highs.
Perhaps the ministry should be clearer about its goals and targets. What exactly is “a stable and more sustainable path”, in its view?
FOREIGN BUYERS
Yes, the proportion of foreign purchases of residential property has come down — from 20 per cent last year to 7 per cent for the first six months of the year.
This is perhaps because of the introduction in December last year of the Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD). 
Foreigners (albeit those from America, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Iceland are exempt because of certain trade agreements) here have to pay an ABSD of 10 per cent when they buy a home here.
But what is the proportion of purchases by foreigners that Singapore would be comfortable with? I am sure we do not want to eliminate foreign sales altogether. 
Also, what about the proportion of sales to permanent residents, who have been said to be one of the main causes of the steep jump in prices in sub-sales of housing board flats? 
SPELL OUT THRESHOLDS
As I have argued before in a previous column, there must be a fairer and more transparent way of introducing measures to cool the property market. 
It is not fair for the government to sell land one day and introduce cooling measures the next, as it has done previously. Buyers and sellers should not have to suffer huge losses by being caught unaware.
Property development takes time. It is often a five- to six-year proposition between buying the land, developing it and finally selling it. In the meantime, loans and other finances have to be managed. 
Forecasts are made under prevailing conditions and with current factors in mind. Developers may feel shortchanged if the government one day puts up a piece of land for sale and soon after introduces measures that are negative to developers. 
Residential property buyers and investors would feel likewise, if they purchased a property on current assumptions and conditions, and find the government introducing measures to dampen the market the next day. 
Buying a property is a considerable investment; for most people it makes up a big chunk of their assets and life savings. 
Property, in a society where a very large proportion own their own homes, impacts almost everybody. There is therefore a need for greater clarity in our housing policies. The government should spell out the benchmarks or price thresholds that would entail a response in action from the ministry.
Also, if the government believes in market forces, the “reserve price” in government land sales should be abolished. You cannot say that market forces should prevail and at the same time artificially prop up land prices with the reserve price. The national coffers might suffer a bit, but it might perhaps help make housing more affordable.
There must be more certainty in the property market. There should be less — or no — speculation on when and what measures the government would introduce to curb or cool the market. — Today
* Conrad Raj is Today’s editor-at-large. - The Malaysian Today
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

European developers avoid ‘unlucky’ homes to tap Far East demand

LONDON, July 19 — This September, work starts on a development of 22 homes around a Chinese-style courtyard, pavilion and pond. Enclosed by high white walls, it will have Chinese symbols adorning an entrance gate topped with a roof reminiscent of a Far Eastern temple.
It is being built not in China but Fuenlabrada, an industrial suburb 17 miles (27km) south of Madrid, the capital of debt-ravaged Spain where thousands of construction projects have stopped in their tracks.
“The Chinese have a saying; crisis is synonymous with opportunity,” said Jose Parra, chief executive of the Spanish developer Grupo MAIN, referring to his decision to tap the local immigrant Chinese population after the financial crisis sapped demand among his fellow Spaniards.
“We’re building for the Chinese because they are a very wealthy community in Spain and the rest of the world.”
Parra is one of a growing number of European property developers using Chinese tastes and traditional beliefs such as feng shui, a system designed to maximise positive energy flow, to entice rocketing numbers of cash-rich Far East buyers.
All of the Fuenlabrada homes, which were designed and laid out according to the laws of feng shui, have been reserved with a €5,000 (RM20,000) deposit and Parra plans to build another 70 once the scheme completes in 2014.
The trend has even more momentum in London, where a third of the best new-build homes were sold to Far East buyers last year, up from just 4 per cent in 2009, property consultancy Savills said.
While British buyers have struggled to get mortgages from banks crippled by the global financial crisis, strong economic growth in Asia has created immense wealth, fuelled by manufacturing, construction and commodities. The number of US dollar millionaires in Asia outnumbered North America for the first time in 2011.
Should restrictions barring Chinese citizens buying more than US$50,000 (RM150,000) worth of foreign money be lifted, a wave of buyers from mainland China could boost prices for the best London homes by 15 per cent, Savills said.
“We’ve all had to become aware of what the Chinese look for and what will stop them from buying,” said Sebastian Warner, partner in residential development at property consultancy Knight Frank.
Feng shui is a 4,000-year-old Chinese land management system that attempts to increase health and wealth by boosting the flow of positive energy in a given environment and adherents reject properties upon the advice of feng shui practitioners.
“Most Chinese grow up with certain cultural beliefs,” said Philip Yong, a 60-year-old Malaysian Chinese who is flat hunting in London. “It’s like you instinctively know what kind of food you should eat.”
Yong, who owns homes in Toronto, Singapore and Kuala Lumpur with good feng shui, is looking for a property near the River Thames due to his belief that water channels positive energy.
“There’s a certain sort of energy level that one looks for and you can sense when it’s in the neighbourhood,” he said, adding that narrow streets, busy road junctions and houses with little natural light all entail poor flows of positive energy.
London developer Native Land was unable to sell a string of flats in a Chelsea block to Far Eastern buyers last year due to their layout.
“We were scratching our heads trying to work out why they wouldn’t sell. We were eventually told the bathroom door was too close to the front door, which meant the good fortune flowed out of the property,” said chief executive Alasdair Nicholls, who said he would avoid similar layouts in future.
A belief that certain numbers bring good or bad luck is also relevant. Some buildings in China change floor numbers to omit the number four because it sounds like the word for “death” in Chinese, while the number eight is considered lucky as it sounds like the word for “prosperity”.
Native Land’s 227 luxury apartments in a Richard Rogers-designed scheme on the opposite side of the River Thames from St Paul’s Cathedral in London do not contain the number four for that reason, Nicholls said.
Harry Handelsman, chief executive of UK developer Manhattan Loft Corporation, has used a feng shui master on seven of his company’s properties, including the £200 million (RM1 billion) restoration of a hotel next to London’s St Pancras International train station.
The company added crystal furnishings, which are believed to help channel positive energy, and altered interior layouts to counter the negative effect that departing trains have on the site’s energy under the principles of feng shui.
Meanwhile, Berkeley Group imported tons of marble and Chinese granite for the interiors of a 50-storey apartment tower south of the River Thames, one of many developers that push their Far Eastern credentials in their marketing material.
While feng shui adherents believe ponds and fountains help positive energy flow, they dislike sharp angles as they break the path of energy. A pillar in the main lobby of the Heron tower skyscraper in London was changed from square to round for this reason before it opened in 2011.
Feng shui masters can charge up to two per cent of the building’s development cost depending on their reputation, with bigger schemes typically costing tens or hundreds of millions of pounds.
Feng shui master Michael Oon, a former forensic scientist with London’s Metropolitan Police, cited Apple’s London Regent Street store, as an example of a building with good feng shui.
“For London, the energy flows from Regents Park, Hyde Park and Green Park,” Oon said. “Energy flows down Regent Street, straight through Piccadilly and to the River Thames. The Apple store is on a bend on the road so the energy goes straight through the door,” Oon said.
Meanwhile, he said, oil giant BP’s myriad problems began after it moved its UK headquarters from Finsbury Square to St James Square in London’s West End in 2002, a location that positive energy bypasses. A BP spokesman dismissed the suggestion as “outrageous and stupid”.
A decision by six Chinese banks to set up London offices close to the Bank of England in the City financial district was likely related to feng shui, property agents said. The Bank is seen as an authority figure and therefore a source of good energy.
Beliefs in feng shui manifest most strongly in the designs of buildings in Hong Kong and Singapore. For instance, a residential block facing Hong Kong’s Repulse Bay waterfront has a hole in the middle purportedly to allow dragons that live on a mountain behind to drink water from the bay.
Younger more western-minded buyers can pay less attention.
Those buying as an investment were keener to get a good bargain than good feng shui, said Michelle Zhang, head of property consultancy DTZ’s China desk, who changed her telephone number to include more number eights after taking the job.
“It’s something nice to have, but not a must-have. As a priority on their shopping list, it comes after price and location,” she said.
Either way, many developers still err on the side of caution.
“I cannot say I’m an absolute believer but if millions of people believe in a particular thing and it doesn’t affect the aesthetic of what we’re doing, I don’t see why not,” Handelsman said. — Reuters

首长:正视全球商业流程外包要求 槟将设科技研发中心


(槟城18日讯)槟州首长林冠英透露,槟州发展机构最近已经征询计划书,以发展峇六拜沿海大道一块2.4英亩的地段作为研究与发展中心,中心名为 “槟州研究、创新与科学中心” (PRISM),协助槟州在科研及科技创新上,能与已发展国家并驾齐驱。他强调,制造业与服务业的汇合,将是槟州政府要将槟城转换成高收入、高科技及高附加价值经济的重要关键行动。
他认为,资讯科技商业流程外包中心将会加速制造业与服务业的汇合,并将槟城的服务业提高到另一个层次。“槟城作为马来西亚的硅谷,各电子业大厂将乐观其成及协助资讯科技商业流程外包在槟城的发展。”他指出,槟城原有的工业群组所组成的产业链,可以让企业有能力投身顶端的研究与发展领域。林冠英是于周三在假依恩奥酒店举行共用服务(Shared Services)与外包(Outsourcing)研讨会上,致词时如此指出。
在致词中,林冠英也说,槟城作为新兴的资讯科技商业流程外包据点,州政府非常正面看待槟城符合当今全球商业流程外包的要求,这包括:
 (1) 技术设定——槟城是马来西亚最早工业化及城市化的地方,也表示槟城是人才聚集人文荟萃的地点,能符合投资者这方面需求。(2) 成本——2011年ECA国际调查全球240座城市的生活开销,槟城排在209名,在亚洲则排在第40名。因此,相比柔佛亚洲排37名全球199名、吉隆坡亚洲33名全球186名,槟城的生活开销成本相对廉宜。(3) 拥有世界级的设施,包括优良的传播与沟通设备,也包括了数码智慧。槟城是马来西亚唯一州属在公众地方提供免费无线上网的地方。目前槟州无线上网计划已经在全槟的公众地方设有1550个免费无线上网热点。(4)  州政府采用能干、公信与透明的施政方针进行良政与廉政。以廉洁智慧作为核心价值,州政府已经透过公开招标、完全公开政府合约及公开申报政府领袖的资产,让州政府的盈余破纪录的增加,同时破纪录的减少了州政府债务。(5) 州政府已经成立职业协助与培训中心,以再培训及留住人才。职业协助及培训中心已经透过网站的设立搜寻国际人才,同时与人力资源业者进行对话及在国内外高等学府进行招揽活动。- 光华

世界不动产联盟槟分会 不认同发展商负面报导


槟城18日讯)马来西亚世界不动产联盟槟城分会对近来某些报章对槟州发展商的负面报导方式深表关注。该会认为,这些报导以所谓的“山坡发展猖獗”为题大作文章,以环保之观点为名,极尽描绘之能事,引导读者对槟州屋业发展商产生负面印象,实质上也诱导了公众进入一场“政治性责难游戏”。
这些负面描绘发展商的报导是难令人认同的,因为这些发展商是拥有合法权力去发展他们购取的土地的。阻止这些发展商去发展所购土地只意味着在妨碍马来西亚经济的成长。这类负面观点不但吓走了潜在的投资者;也让现有的投资者及发展商身陷险境。“这些居心叵测的新闻报道文章,只涉猎表象而非实际,只大量提出问题而鲜少给予答案;实际上,报章正确的报道方式应是提供可信的报道内容之外,也应公开揭示新闻背景,事情状况是为何及如何产生的,把前因后果全盘分析。你不能只报导后果,而不报道前因;你不能只去脉,而没有来龙。因果关系得报导清楚,没有4至5年的过程,就不会有今天的发展景象。”
马来西亚世界不动产联盟槟州分会深信,我国可通过可持续发展而达致进步,房屋需求及促进经济两大目标可相辅相成一齐达至。一些已发达的国际大城市如香港、新加坡及摩纳哥,虽然同样是土地匮乏,但是通过可持续发展,一样可以在经济上达至繁荣兴旺。上述这些大都会共同面临了土地短缺的难题。有鉴于此,山坡发展项目在这些大都会均获允准,条件是有关山坡发展项目是在受到地质技术工程部门管控的基础上进行。“槟州的山坡发展安全指南在2012年获得检讨,从而提供了更清楚明晰的阐释,以大力提倡山坡安全与环境友善的发展项目。这项山坡发展安全指南是发展商必须迫切严格遵守的法则,另一方面。地质技术专家也继续扮演积极角色,为山坡发展相关事务提供监控建议。目前,山坡发展项目的高度限制是海拔76公尺以上。”
须重检山坡高度限定
该会相信有关当局有必要重新检讨这项海拔76公尺的现行山坡发展计划之高度限规定。该会也相信槟岛土地短缺的问题,将对槟岛未来的世代构成更大的挑战,他们必须迎接挑战,以解决可负担房屋之需求以及持续吸引本地与外国投资者来槟以保持经济可持续成长。如果无法解决这项课题,这将会大大不利于我们这个发展中国家,而槟城这个海岛更会深受其害。由于某些媒体近日的报道混淆了公众的视听,马来西亚的屋业发展成长的未来前景因此荆棘满途,处理危险关头。总而言之,当前媒体是否只报导确实的精准资讯将是决定性的关键。媒体如果这么做,则马来西亚经济发展前景才会重现生机。- 光华

凝聚合法夜店增夜间人气 设点范围扩至古迹区


(槟城18日讯)槟岛市政局限制娱乐场所的设立范围第二期计划,将扩大至古迹区,通过凝聚合法夜店的商业活动聚集夜间人气,让夜晚的乔治市古迹区增活力。槟市局限制娱乐场所的设立范围,是为了避免它太靠近住宅区,噪音扰人清梦,也避免寻欢的民众因胡乱停放车辆,影响当地居民的出入。首期共规划出11个特定的地点,至于第二期的地点则圈定在古迹区内,并将寻求世遗机构的意见后再宣布。
槟岛市政局清洁、卫生、执照及公共教育小组交替主席王耶宗告诉《光华日报》,槟市局已于本月初将第二期规划出的古迹区娱乐场所地点提呈给世遗机构(World Heritage Inc.),目前正等待对方回复。一旦获得世遗机构的首肯,槟市局就会宣布第二阶段的地点,并批准在此区域开设娱乐场所的申请。他披露,该局建议适合设立娱乐场所的古迹区地点,包括土库街、海墘新路及莱特街等。他以土库街为例,白天的土库街都是银行与金融业聚集的场域,惟夜幕低垂,白天的繁忙开始变得冷清。若通过酒吧夜店的商业活动,相信将可把古迹区打造成时尚动感娱乐区,带动人气。“建议中的地点并非住宅区,都是商业单位聚集的街道,白天繁忙晚上寂静,若在此区域设立娱乐场所,其噪音不会影响他人,停放车辆也不会造成交通阻塞问题。
他也表示,槟市局日前通过限制娱乐场所开设的11个地点,将在近期内上传至市政局官方网站及在该局执照部的布告栏上发布。换言之,现欲申请开设娱乐场所的业者,都须遵循这项新条文。不过,现有的娱乐场所并不在限制内。“上述建议于上月杪槟市局例常会议上通过后,负责官员就开始着手准备实行的事宜,并已将相关资料送往该局资讯工艺部,料在近期内上传至官网及发布在执照部的布告栏处。”
王耶宗:娱乐场所集中化 方便有关单位监管
王耶宗表示,槟岛市政局在槟岛规划“娱乐场所区域”,不仅可限制娱乐场所的设立地点,集中化后更方便有关单位进行监管。他说,市局执法人员、警方及移民厅(若涉及外籍员工)将对非法经营的娱乐场所采取取缔行动。市局可开出250令吉传票对付违例营业的业者,并充公娱乐器材及物品并不得赎回。他重申,现有的娱乐场所不受限制,但7月1日之后的申请就不获批准。申请者必须遵守新条文规定,仅允许在槟市局规划的11个地点开设娱乐场所。不过,那些在7月1日之前提呈的申请,如已通过市局技术部审核,则将获批准。“现有的娱乐场所,我们(槟市局)不会强制他们搬迁或关闭,只是数量将不再被允许增加。若业者欲休业,不得把娱乐场所顶替给其他方作继续经营。” -